Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-46gqc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-18T19:29:16.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birds in Europe 4: the fourth assessment of Species of European Conservation Concern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2023

Ian J. Burfield Open the ORCID record for Ian J. Burfield [Opens in a new window] ,
Claire A. Rutherford Open the ORCID record for Claire A. Rutherford [Opens in a new window] ,
Eresha Fernando ,
Hannah Grice ,
Alexa Piggott ,
Rob W. Martin ,
Mark Balman ,
Michael I. Evans  and
Anna Staneva
Ian J. Burfield*
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Claire A. Rutherford
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Eresha Fernando
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Hannah Grice
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Alexa Piggott
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Rob W. Martin
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Mark Balman
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Michael I. Evans
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
Anna Staneva
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
*
Corresponding author: Ian J. Burfield; Email: ian.burfield@birdlife.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This is the fourth comprehensive assessment of the population status of all wild bird species in Europe. It identifies Species of European Conservation Concern (SPECs) so that action can be taken to improve their status. Species are categorised according to their global extinction risk, the size and trend of their European population and range, and Europe’s global responsibility for them. Of the 546 species assessed, 207 (38%) are SPECs: 74 (14%) of global concern (SPEC 1); 32 (6%) of European concern and concentrated in Europe (SPEC 2); and 101 (18%) of European concern but not concentrated in Europe (SPEC 3). The proportion of SPECs has remained similar (38–43%) across all four assessments since 1994, but the number of SPEC 1 species of global concern has trebled. The 44 species assessed as Non-SPECs in the third assessment (2017) but as SPECs here include multiple waders, raptors and passerines that breed in arctic, boreal or alpine regions, highlighting the growing importance of northern Europe and mountain ecosystems for bird conservation. Conversely, the 62 species assessed as SPECs in 2017 but as Non-SPECs here include various large waterbirds and raptors that are recovering due to conservation action. Since 1994, the number of specially protected species (listed on Annex I of the EU Birds Directive) qualifying as SPECs has fallen by 33%, while the number of huntable (Annex II) species qualifying as SPECs has risen by 56%. The broad patterns identified previously remain evident: 100 species have been classified as SPECs in all four assessments, including numerous farmland and steppe birds, ducks, waders, raptors, seabirds and long-distance migrants. Many of their populations are heavily depleted or continue to decline and/or contract in range. Europe still holds 3.4–5.4 billion breeding birds, but more action to halt and reverse losses is needed.

Keywords

Bird monitoringBirds Directiveconservation prioritiesEuropean birdsrestoration targets

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 33 , 2023 , e66
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alba, R., Kasoar, T., Chamberlain, D., Buchanan, G., Thompson, D. and Pearce‐Higgins, J. W. (2022) Drivers of change in mountain and upland bird populations in Europe. Ibis 164 : 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlsma, R. J., Agrillo, E., Attorre, F., Boitani, L., Brunner, A., Evans, P., Foppen, R., et al. (2019) Defining and applying the concept of Favourable Reference Values for species and habitats under the EU Birds and Habitats Directives. Technical Report No. 2929. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Environmental Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://datazone.birdlife.org/info/euroredlist2015.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2017) European birds of conservation concern: populations, trends and national responsibilities. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. https://issuu.com/birdlife-international/docs/european_birds_of_conservation_concern_low.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2021) European Red List of birds. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://datazone.birdlife.org/info/euroredlist2021.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2022) IUCN Red List for Birds. Version 2022.1 published on 21 July 2022. http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search.Google Scholar
Bolam, F. C., Ahumada, J., Akçakaya, H. R., Brooks, T. M., Elliott, W., Hoban, S., Mair, L., et al. (2022) Over half of threatened species require targeted recovery actions to avert human‐induced extinction. Front. Ecol. Environ. 21 : 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brlík, V., Šilarová, E., Škorpilová, J., Alonso, H., Anton, M., Aunins, A., Benkö, Z., et al. (2021) Long-term and large-scale multispecies dataset tracking population changes of common European breeding birds. Sci. Data 8 : 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, F., Eaton, M. A., Burfield, I. J., Klvaňová, A., Šilarová, E., Staneva, A. and Gregory, R. D. (2021) Abundance decline in the avifauna of the European Union reveals cross‐continental similarities in biodiversity change. Ecol. Evol. 11 : 16647–16660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBD (2022) Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. 15th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal, Canada, 7–19 December 2022. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/e6d3/cd1d/daf663719a03902a9b116c34/cop-15-l-25-en.pdf.Google Scholar
CMS (2015) Action Plan for the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia. https://www.cms.int/raptors/sites/default/files/basic_page_documents/raptors-mou_annex3_action-plan_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Donald, P. F., Green, R. E. and Heath, M. F. (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc. Royal Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 268 : 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, P. F., Sanderson, F. J., Burfield, I. J., Bierman, S. M., Gregory, R. D. and Waliczky, Z. (2007) International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science 317 : 810–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, P. F., Sanderson, F. J., Burfield, I. J. and Van Bommel, F. P. (2006) Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116 : 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC (2011) Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0244&from=EN.Google Scholar
EC (2020) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing Nature Back Into Our Lives. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1590574123338&uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0380.Google Scholar
EC (2023) The Birds Directive: EU Measures to Protect Europe’s Wild Bird Species. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/nature-and-biodiversity/birds-directive_en.Google Scholar
EEA (2015) State of nature in the EU: results from reporting under the Nature Directives 2007–2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu.Google Scholar
EEA (2020) State of nature in the EU: results from reporting under the Nature Directives 2013–2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu-2020.Google Scholar
Grace, M. K., Akçakaya, H. R., Bennett, E. L., Brooks, T. M., Heath, A., Hedges, S., Hilton‐Taylor, C., et al. (2021) Testing a global standard for quantifying species recovery and assessing conservation impact. Conserv. Biol. 35 : 1833–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemeijer, W. J. and Blair, M. J. (1997) The EBCC atlas of European breeding birds: their distribution and abundance. London, UK: Poyser.Google Scholar
HBW and BirdLife International (2022) Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International Digital Checklist of the Birds of the World. Version 6b. http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/taxonomy.Google Scholar
Heredia, B., Rose, L. and Painter, M. (1996) Globally threatened birds in Europe: action plans. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
IUCN (2012a) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. Second edition. Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK: International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/10315.Google Scholar
IUCN (2012b) Guidelines for application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional and national levels: version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK: International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/10336.Google Scholar
IUCN (2018) Criterion A Tool: Population Reduction Calculator. https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/criterion-a.Google Scholar
Kalyakin, M., Voltzit, O., Voříšek, P., Herrando, S. and Keller, V. (2022) Changes in the ranges of breeding bird species in the European part of Russia during the last 20–30 years. Ornithol. Beobachter 119 : 400–416.Google Scholar
Keller, V., Herrando, S., Voříšek, P., Franch, M., Kipson, M., Milanesi, P., Martí, D., et al. (2020) European breeding bird atlas 2: distribution, abundance and change. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions and European Bird Census Council. https://ebba2.info/.Google Scholar
Le Saout, S., Hoffmann, M., Shi, Y., Hughes, A., Bernard, C., Brooks, T. M., Bertzky, B., et al. (2013) Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science 342 : 803–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclère, D., Obersteiner, M., Barrett, M., Butchart, S. H. M., Chaudhary, A., De Palma, A., DeClerck, F. A., et al. (2020) Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585 : 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledger, S. E., Rutherford, C. A., Benham, C., Burfield, I. J., Deinet, S., Eaton, M., Freeman, R., et al. (2022) Wildlife comeback in Europe: opportunities and challenges for species recovery. London, UK: Zoological Society of London, BirdLife International, and the European Bird Census Council.Google Scholar
Lehikoinen, A., Brotons, L., Calladine, J., Campedelli, T., Escandell, V., Flousek, J., Grueneberg, C., et al. (2019) Declining population trends of European mountain birds. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25 : 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengyel, S., Nagy, G., Tóth, M., Mészáros, G., Nagy, C. P., Mizsei, E., Szabolcs, M., et al. (2023) Grassland restoration benefits declining farmland birds: a landscape-scale before-after-control-impact experiment. Biol. Conserv. 277 : 109846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyrer, J., Brown, D., Gerritsen, G., Hötker, H. and Ottvall, R., compilers. (2018) International Multispecies Action Plan for the Conservation of Breeding Waders in Wet Grassland Habitats in Europe (2018–2028). Report of Action A13 under the framework of Project LIFE EuroSAP (LIFE14 PRE/UK/002). NABU, RSPB, VBN, and SOF.Google Scholar
Lindström, Å., Green, M., Husby, M., Kålås, J. A., Lehikoinen, A. and Stjernman, M. (2019) Population trends of waders on their boreal and arctic breeding grounds in northern Europe. Wader Study 126 : 200–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlacky, D. C., Green, A. W., George, T. L., Iovanna, R., Bartuszevige, A. M., Correll, M. D., Panjabi, A. O., et al. (2022) Landscape‐scale conservation mitigates the biodiversity loss of grassland birds. Ecol. Appl. 32 : e2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavón-Jordán, D., Abdou, W., Azafzaf, H., Balaž, M., Bino, T., Borg, J. J., Božič, L., et al. (2020) Positive impacts of important bird and biodiversity areas on wintering waterbirds under changing temperatures throughout Europe and North Africa. Biol. Conserv. 246 : 108549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, F. J., Donald, P. F., Pain, D. J., Burfield, I. J. and Van Bommel, F. P. (2006) Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds. Biol. Conserv. 131 : 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, F. J., Pople, R. G., Ieronymidou, C., Burfield, I. J., Gregory, R. D., Willis, S. G., Howard, C., et al. (2016) Assessing the performance of EU nature legislation in protecting target bird species in an era of climate change. Conserv. Lett. 9 : 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäffer, N. and Gallo-Orsi, U., eds. (2001) European Union action plans for eight priority bird species. BirdLife International/European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Stroud, D., Francis, I. and Stroud, R. (2012) Spotted Crakes breeding in Britain and Ireland: a history and evaluation of current status. Br. Birds 105 : 197–220.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. M., ed. (2023) Nature conservation in Europe: approaches and lessons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, G. M. and Evans, M. I., eds. (1997) Habitats for birds in Europe: a conservation strategy for the wider environment. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 6. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. M. and Heath, M. F. (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 3. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Voříšek, P., Gregory, R. D., Keller, V., Herrando, S., Lindström, Å., Nagy, S., Burfield, I. J., et al. (2018) Wetzel et al. fail to identify the real gaps in European bird monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 225 : 245–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waliczky, Z., Fishpool, L. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Thomas, D., Heath, M. F., Hazin, C., Donald, P. F., et al. (2019) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): their impact on conservation policy, advocacy and action. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 29 : 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetlands International (2022) Waterbird Populations Portal. http://wpp.wetlands.org/.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Burfield et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Burfield et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Burfield et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Burfield et al. supplementary material(File)
File 58.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Burfield et al. supplementary material

Table S3

Download Burfield et al. supplementary material(File)
File 51.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Burfield et al. supplementary material

Table S4

Download Burfield et al. supplementary material(File)
File 53.2 KB