Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Do Smartphones have the Potential to Support Cognition and Independence Following Stroke?

  • Dana Wong (a1) (a2), Qiao Jerry Wang (a1), Renerus Stolwyk (a1) (a2) and Jennie Ponsford (a1) (a2)
Abstract

Management of cognitive difficulties is a significant unmet need for individuals with stroke. Incorporating multiple functions, including memory aids and communication tools, smartphones have potential to improve everyday cognitive function and independence in daily activities post-stroke. We aimed to investigate patterns of smartphone use, facilitators and barriers to use, and relationships between smartphone use and daily functioning. Twenty-nine participants with stroke and 29 comparison participants with no history of neurological conditions completed measures of smartphone use, objective and subjective cognitive function, mood and community integration. The majority of participants used smartphones, though the proportion of users was lower in the stroke group (62%) than the comparison group (86%). Older participants were less likely to use smartphones. Using apps that support memory was a main benefit of smartphone use post-stroke. In the stroke group, frequent users of memory apps had significantly fewer motor symptoms (d = 1.20), and higher productivity (d = 0.84). Stroke survivors identified difficulty learning how to use smartphones, but only one participant had assistance with this from a clinician. These results suggest that smartphones have potential as assistive technology post-stroke, however, support in using them is essential, particularly for older individuals with motor dysfunction.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr Dana Wong, School of Psychological Sciences, 18 Innovation Walk, Monash University Clayton VIC 3800, Australia. E-mail: dana.wong@monash.edu.
References
Hide All
Andrew, N.E., Kilkenny, M., Naylor, R., Purvis, T., Lalor, E., Moloczij, N., . . . National Stroke, F. (2014). Understanding long-term unmet needs in Australian survivors of stroke. International Journal of Stroke, 9 (Suppl. A100), 106112. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12325.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016). Retrieved October 1, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au.
Australian Communications and Media Authority (2013). Communications report 2012–13. Retrieved Oct 1st, 2014, from http://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/Library/Corporate-library/Corporate-publications/communications-report-2012-13.
Barker-Collo, S., Krishnamurthi, R., Feigin, V., Jones, A., Theadom, A., Barber, P.A., . . . Bennett, D. (2016). Neuropsychological outcome and its predictors across the first year after ischaemic stroke. Brain Impairment, 17 (2), 111122.
Boosman, H., van Heugten, C.M., Winkens, I., Heijnen, V.A., & Visser-Meily, J.M.A. (2014). Awareness of memory functioning in patients with stroke who have a good functional outcome. Brain Injury, 28 (7), 959964.
Brandenburg, C., Worrall, L., Copland, D., Power, E., & Rodriguez, A.D. (2016). The development and accuracy testing of CommFitTM, an iPhone application for individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 30 (2–3), 320338.
Broadbent, D.E., Cooper, P.F., Fitzgerald, P., & Parkes, K.R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21 (1), 116.
Charters, E., Gillett, L., & Simpson, G.K. (2015). Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25 (1), 82121. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.942672.
Cumming, T.B., Bernhardt, J., & Linden, T. (2011). The montreal cognitive assessment short cognitive evaluation in a large stroke trial. Stroke, 42 (9), 26422644.
Dahm, J., Wong, D., & Ponsford, J. (2013). Validity of the depression anxiety stress scales in assessing depression and anxiety following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151 (1), 392396. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.011
Das Nair, R., Martin, K.-J., & Sinclair, E.J. (2015). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on perceptions of people with long-term neurological conditions about group-based memory rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25 (4), 479502. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.971820.
de Joode, E.A., van Boxtel, M.P., Verhey, F.R., & van Heugten, C.M. (2012). Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Injury, 26 (10), 12571266.
Dowds, M.M., Lee, P.H., Sheer, J.B., O'Neil-Pirozzi, T.M., Xenopoulos-Oddsson, A., Goldstein, R., . . .Glenn, M.B. (2011). Electronic reminding technology following traumatic brain injury: Effects on timely task completion. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26 (5), 339347. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181f2bf1d.
Ferguson, S., Friedland, D., & Woodberry, E. (2015). Smartphone technology: gentle reminders of everyday tasks for those with prospective memory difficulties post-brain injury. Brain Injury, 29 (5), 583591. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.1002109.
Freitas, S., Simões, M.R., Alves, L., Vicente, M., & Santana, I. (2012). Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): Validation study for vascular dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18 (06), 10311040.
Gillespie, A., Best, C., & O'Neill, B. (2012). Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: A systematic review. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18 (1), 119. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001548.
Gregor, P., Newell, A.F., & Zajicek, M. (2002). Designing for dynamic diversity: Interfaces for older people. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=638249.638277.
Hart, T., Buchhofer, R., & Vaccaro, M. (2004). Portable electronic devices as memory and organizational aids after traumatic brain injury: A consumer survey study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19 (5), 351365.
Jamieson, M., Cullen, B., McGee-Lennon, M., Brewster, S., & Evans, J. (2015). Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 118. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1103760. Published online 28 October, 2015.
Jamieson, M., Cullen, B., McGee-Lennon, M., Brewster, S., & Evans, J.J. (2014). The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24 (3–4), 419444. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.825632.
Jokinen, H., Melkas, S., Ylikoski, R., Pohjasvaara, T., Kaste, M., Erkinjuntti, T., & Hietanen, M. (2015). Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. European Journal of Neurology, 22 (9), 12881294. doi: 10.1111/ene.12743.
Lindqvist, E., & Borell, L. (2012). Computer-based assistive technology and changes in daily living after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 7 (5), 364371. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.638036.
Lovibond, S.H., & Lovibond, P.F. (2004). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation Monograph.
Nasreddine, Z.S., Phillips, N.A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., . . . Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53 (4), 695699.
National Stroke Foundation (2010). Clinical guidelines for management 2010. Melbourne, Australia.
Pollock, A., St George, B., Fenton, M., & Firkins, L. (2012). Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. Lancet Neurology, 11 (3), 209. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70029-7.
Strauss, E., Sherman, E.M.S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (3rd ed., pp. 5960). New York: Oxford University Press.
Svoboda, E., Richards, B., Leach, L., & Mertens, V. (2012). PDA and smartphone use by individuals with moderate-to-severe memory impairment: application of a theory-driven training programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22 (3), 408427. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.652498.
Taylor, G.H., & Broomfield, N.M. (2013). Cognitive assessment and rehabilitation pathway for stroke (CARPS). Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20 (3), 270282. doi: 10.1310/tsr2003-270.
Thilarajah, S., Clark, R.A., & Williams, G. (2016). Wearable sensors and Mobile Health (mHealth) technologies to assess and promote physical activity in stroke:A narrative review. Brain Impairment, 17 (1), 3442.
Willer, B., Rosenthal, M., Kreutzer, J.S., Gordon, W.A., & Rempel, R. (1993). Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8 (2), 7587. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199308020-00009.
Wilson, B.A., Gracey, F., Evans, J., & Bateman, A. (2009). Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Theory, models, therapy and outcome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, D., Dahm, J., & Ponsford, J. (2013). Factor structure of the depression anxiety stress scales in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 27 (12), 13771382. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.823662.
Wong, D., Sinclair, K., Seabrook, E., McKay, A., & Ponsford, J. (2016). Smartphones as assistive technology following traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study of what helps and what hinders. Disability and Rehabilitation. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1226434. Published online 17 October, 2016.
Zajicek, M., & Morrissey, W. (2001). Interface design for older adults. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF workshop on Universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing: providing for the elderly. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=564526.564543
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Brain Impairment
  • ISSN: 1443-9646
  • EISSN: 1839-5252
  • URL: /core/journals/brain-impairment
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 119 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 924 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd May 2017 - 19th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.