Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 30
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hung, Kuang-chi 2016. “Plants that Remind Me of Home”: Collecting, Plant Geography, and a Forgotten Expedition in the Darwinian Revolution. Journal of the History of Biology,

    Nichols, Catherine A. and Parezo, Nancy J. 2016. Social and Material Connections: Otis T. Mason’s European Grand Tour and Collections Exchanges. History and Anthropology, p. 1.

    Rectenwald, Michael 2016. Nineteenth-Century British Secularism.

    White, Paul 2016. Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science.

    Pocock, Michael J. O. Roy, Helen E. Preston, Chris D. and Roy, David B. 2015. The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 115, Issue. 3, p. 475.

    CURRY, HELEN ANNE 2014. From garden biotech to garage biotech: amateur experimental biology in historical perspective. The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 47, Issue. 03, p. 539.

    Elias, Scott A. 2014. A Brief History of the Changing Occupations and Demographics of Coleopterists from the 18th Through the 20th Century. Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 213.

    Groom, Q. J. O’Reilly, C. and Humphrey, T. 2014. Herbarium specimens reveal the exchange network of British and Irish botanists, 1856–1932. New Journal of Botany, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 95.

    Loskutova, Marina 2014. Early Research on Insect Pests in the Russian Empire: Bureaucracy, Academic Community and Local Knowledge in the 1830s-1840s. Centaurus, Vol. 56, Issue. 4, p. 229.

    OPITZ, DONALD L. 2014. ‘The sceptre of her pow'r’: nymphs, nobility, and nomenclature in early Victorian science. The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 47, Issue. 01, p. 67.

    Adelman, Juliana 2012. An insight into commercial natural history: Richard Glennon, William Hinchy and the nineteenth-century trade in giant Irish deer remains. Archives of Natural History, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 16.

    Theunissen, Bert 2012. Darwin and His Pigeons. The Analogy Between Artificial and Natural Selection Revisited. Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 179.

    BECKETT, JOHN and WATKINS, CHARLES 2011. Natural History and Local History in Late Victorian and Edwardian England: The Contribution of the Victoria County History. Rural History, Vol. 22, Issue. 01, p. 59.

    Vetter, Jeremy 2011. Lay Observers, Telegraph Lines, and Kansas Weather: The Field Network as a Mode of Knowledge Production. Science in Context, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 259.

    Vetter, Jeremy 2011. Introduction: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation. Science in Context, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 127.

    Roque, Ricardo 2010. Headhunting and Colonialism.

    Banham, Christopher 2009. Natural History in the Periodical Literature of Victorian Working Class Boys. Childhood in the Past, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 132.

    Papanelopoulou, Faidra and Kjaergaard, Peter C. 2009. Making the Paper: Science and Technology in Spanish, Greek and Danish Newspapers Around 1900. Centaurus, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 89.

    Chirico, Paul 2007. John Clare and the Imagination of the Reader.

    Secord, James A. 2007. HOW SCIENTIFIC CONVERSATION BECAME SHOP TALK. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Vol. 17, p. 129.

  • The British Journal for the History of Science, Volume 27, Issue 4
  • December 1994, pp. 383-408

Corresponding interests: artisans and gentlemen in nineteenth-century natural history

  • Anne Secord (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2009

Early nineteenth-century natural history books reveal that British naturalists depended heavily on correspondence as a means for gathering information and specimens. Edward Newman commented in his History of British Ferns: ‘Were I to make out a list of all the correspondents who have assisted me it would be wearisome from its length.’ Works such as William Withering's Botanical Arrangement show that artisans numbered among his correspondents. However, the literary products of scientific practice reveal little of the workings or such correspondences and how or why they were sustained. An exchange or letters is maintained if the interests of both recipient and writer are satisfied. Withering's book tells us only that his interests were served by his correspondents; it allows us to say nothing with certainty about the interests of those who wrote to him. Published texts effectively hide the means by which the author determined the veracity of distant correspondents and also the way these informants demonstrated their credibility.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Martin Rudwick , The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists, Chicago, 1985

Anne Secord , ‘Science in the pub: artisan botanists in early nineteenth-century Lancashire’, History of Science (1994), 32, 269315.

Steven Shapin and Barry Barnes , ‘Head and hand: rhetorical resources in British pedagogical writing, 1770–1850’, Oxford Review of Education (1976), 2, 231–54.

Adi Ophir and Steven Shapin , ‘The place of knowledge: a methodological survey’, Science in Context (1991), 4, 321, on 11.

Marjorie Morgan , Manners, Morals and Class in England, 1774–1858, London, 1994.

Mario Biagioli , ‘Galileo the emblem maker’, Isis (1990), 81, 230–58

Arjun Appadurai , ‘Introduction: commodities and the politics of value’, in The Social Life of Things (ed. A. Appadurai ), Cambridge, 1986, 363.

Adrian Desmond , ‘The making of institutional zoology in London 1822–1836: Part I’, History of Science (1985), 23, 153–85

Michael Shortland , ‘Darkness visible: underground culture in the golden age of geology’, History of Science (1994), 32, 161

Alison Winter , ‘Mesmerism and popular culture in early Victorian England’, History of Science (1994), 32, 317–43, on 335.

Janet Browne , ‘Botany for gentlemen: Erasmus Darwin and The Loves of the Plants’, Isis (1989), 80, 593621

James R. Griesemer and Elihu M. Gerson , ‘Collaboration in the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology’, Journal of the History of Biology (1993), 26, 185203, on 202.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *