Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A view of the chemical revolution through contemporary textbooks: Lavoisier, Fourcroy and Chaptal*

  • Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (a1)
Abstract

Scientific textbooks are often said to deliver a stereotyped kind of knowledge, which conceals rather than reveals the real making of science. They may, however, alternatively be regarded as of peculiar interest for historians of science. An over-mechanical application of the Kuhnian concepts of ‘scientific revolution’ and ‘normal science’ can lead to the neglect of the internal dynamics of ‘normal science’. Scientific textbooks may provide a better understanding of the process of normalization in science.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

H. Metzger , ‘Introduction à I'étude du rôle de Lavoisier dans l'histoire de la chimie’, Archeion, (1932), 14, pp. 2150

W.A. Smeaton , Ambix, (1959), 7, pp. 4950

C.E. Perrin , ‘The Lavoisier-Bucquet collaboration: A Conjecture’, Ambix, (1989), 36, pp. 513.

I.B. Cohen , Revolution in Science, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.

H. Guerlac , ‘Chemistry as a branch of physics: Laplace's collaboration with Lavoisier’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, (1976), 7, pp. 193276

A. Donovan , ‘Lavoisier and the origins of modern chemistry, Osiris, (1989), 4, pp. 214231.

H.E. Le Grand , ‘Theory and application: the early chemical work of J.A.C. Chaptal’, British Journal for the History of Science, (1984), 17, pp. 3146.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal for the History of Science
  • ISSN: 0007-0874
  • EISSN: 1474-001X
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-for-the-history-of-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 10 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 102 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.