Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 96
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Chusyd, Daniella E. Wang, Donghai Huffman, Derek M. and Nagy, Tim R. 2016. Relationships between Rodent White Adipose Fat Pads and Human White Adipose Fat Depots. Frontiers in Nutrition, Vol. 3,


    Gámez-López, Antonio Luis Bonilla-Palomas, Juan Luis López-Ibáñez, María Cristina Moreno-Conde, Mirian Anguita-Sánchez, Manuel and Villar-Ráez, Antonia 2016. Valoración de la composición corporal y su influencia pronóstica en insuficiencia cardiaca crónica. Más allá de la «paradoja de la obesidad». Archivos de Cardiología de México,


    Corsi, Daniel J Subramanian, S V Ackerson, Leland K and Davey Smith, George 2015. Is there a greater maternal than paternal influence on offspring adiposity in India?. Archives of Disease in Childhood, Vol. 100, Issue. 10, p. 973.


    Dittus, Wolfgang P.J. and Gunathilake, K.A. Sunil 2015. Validating skinfold thickness as a proxy to estimate total body fat in wild toque macaques (Macaca sinica) using the mass of dissected adipose tissue. American Journal of Primatology, Vol. 77, Issue. 6, p. 618.


    Ruff, Ryan Richard and Zhen, Chen 2015. Estimating the effects of a calorie-based sugar-sweetened beverage tax on weight and obesity in New York City adults using dynamic loss models. Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 25, Issue. 5, p. 350.


    Varlamov, Oleg Bethea, Cynthia L. and Roberts, Charles T. 2015. Sex-Specific Differences in Lipid and Glucose Metabolism. Frontiers in Endocrinology, Vol. 5,


    Buss, Julia 2014. Limitations of Body Mass Index to Assess Body Fat. Workplace Health & Safety, Vol. 62, Issue. 6, p. 264.


    Khanfir, M.A. Kamoun, A. Heubert, R. and Masmoudi, L. 2014. L’entraînement combiné de la force et de l’endurance chez de jeunes footballeurs. Science & Sports, Vol. 29, Issue. 2, p. 71.


    Elia, M 2013. Body composition by whole-body bioelectrical impedance and prediction of clinically relevant outcomes: overvalued or underused?. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 67, p. S60.


    Lambert, E. Straznicky, N. Sari, C. I. Eikelis, N. Hering, D. Head, G. Dixon, J. Esler, M. Schlaich, M. and Lambert, G. 2013. Dyslipidemia Is Associated With Sympathetic Nervous Activation and Impaired Endothelial Function in Young Females. American Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 250.


    Loenneke, Jeremy P. Hirt, Kathryn M. Wilson, Jacob M. Barnes, Jeremy T and Pujol, Thomas J 2013. Predicting Body Composition in College Students Using the Womersley and Durnin Body Mass Index Equation. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 4, Issue. 2,


    Ranasinghe, Chathuranga Gamage, Prasanna Katulanda, Prasad Andraweera, Nalinda Thilakarathne, Sithira and Tharanga, Praveen 2013. Relationship between Body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage, estimated by bioelectrical impedance, in a group of Sri Lankan adults: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,


    Watson, Patricia Ellyett and McDonald, Barry William 2013. Subcutaneous Body Fat in Pregnant New Zealand Women: Association with Wheeze in Their Infants at 18 Months. Maternal and Child Health Journal, Vol. 17, Issue. 5, p. 959.


    Ba, A. Diop, M. Fall, A. Gati Ouonkoye, R. Sar, F.B. and Cissé, F. 2012. Déterminants de la lactatémie après course sur 200m et 400m plats chez des athlètes africains spécialisés dans ces deux distances. Science & Sports, Vol. 27, Issue. 5, p. e62.


    Karastergiou, Kalypso Smith, Steven R Greenberg, Andrew S and Fried, Susan K 2012. Sex differences in human adipose tissues – the biology of pear shape. Biology of Sex Differences, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 13.


    McGee, Steven 2012. Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis.


    McGibbon, D. H. 2010. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology.


    Shafer, Kimberly J. Siders, William A. Johnson, LuAnn K. and Lukaski, Henry C. 2010. Body density estimates from upper-body skinfold thicknesses compared to air-displacement plethysmography. Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 29, Issue. 2, p. 249.


    Deitel, Mervyn 2009. Tratamiento Quirúrgico de la Obesidad.


    Gibberd, F. B. Billimoria, J. D. Goldman, J. M. Clemens, M. E. Evans, R. Whitelaw, M. N. Retsas, S. and Sherratt, R. M. 2009. Heredopathia atactica polyneuritiformis: Refsum's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Vol. 72, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    ×

A comparison of the skinfold method with extent of ‘overweight’ and various weight-height relationships in the assessment of obesity

  • J. Womersley (a1) and J. V. G. A. Durnin (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN19770088
  • Published online: 01 March 2007
Abstract

1. Body-weight, height, skinfold thickness and body density measurements were made on 245 men and 324 women aged between 17 and 72 years. The body fat content of each individual was calculated from his density measurement using equations similar to that of Siri (1956) but appropriate to age, muscular development, and extent of obesity. Regression equations were then derived for separate age-groups for the prediction of body fat from (1) weight–height (W–H) relationships (W:H, W:H2 W:H3, W0.33:H, H:W0.33), (2) ‘percentage overweight’ (body-weight:mean body-weight; W:W;) and ‘percentage desirable weight’ body-weight: ‘desirable weight’ (mean weights for men and women aged 20-24 years); (W:DES), (3) the independent variables weight and height incorporated in a regression equation, (4) skinfold measurements.

2. The correlations between height and indices, W:H, W:H3, W0.33:H and H:W0.33: were substantially different from those between height and body fat estimated by densitometry.

3. The method having the highest correlation with body fat estimated by densitometry was the skinfold method, although in the older groups of women other methods sometimes gave equally good correlations. The index H:W0.33 had a negative correlation with body fat, and the indices W:H, W0.33:H and W:H3 had a lower correlation with body fat estimated by densitometry than did the other indices. These indices are therefore unsuitable measures of obesity, and this is in agreement with the findings of other workers.

4. The correlations betweeen body fat estimated by densitometry and the indices W:H2, W:W, W:DES and the equations incorporating the independent variable weight and height are all very similar, although it is not appropriate to use the index W:W; as a measure of obesity in groups of people of widely different ages.

5. The standard error of prediction of body fat from skinfold measurement may be of the same order of magnitude as the standard error of prediction of body fat by densitometry. It is therefore probably inappropriate to assess the accuracy of the skinfold method by comparison with the density method alone.

6. From the distribution patterns obtained, it was evident that compared with the density method, all methods tended to over-estimate body fat in very lean individuals. The skinfold method however showed this tendency to only a relatively small extent.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A comparison of the skinfold method with extent of ‘overweight’ and various weight-height relationships in the assessment of obesity
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A comparison of the skinfold method with extent of ‘overweight’ and various weight-height relationships in the assessment of obesity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A comparison of the skinfold method with extent of ‘overweight’ and various weight-height relationships in the assessment of obesity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Hume & E. Weyers (1971). J. clin. Path. 24, 234.

A. Keys , F. Fidanza , M. J. Karvonen , N. Kimura & H. H. Taylor (1972). J. Chron. Dis. 25, 329.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×