Skip to main content
×
Home

Another approach to estimating the reliability of glycaemic index

  • Sheila M. Williams (a1), Bernard J. Venn (a2), Tracy Perry (a2), Rachel Brown (a2), Alison Wallace (a3), Jim I. Mann (a2) and Tim J. Green (a2)...
Abstract

The usefulness of the glycaemic index (GI) of a food for practical advice for individuals with diabetes or the general population depends on its reliability, as estimated by intra-class coefficient (ICC), a measure having values between 0 and 1, with values closer to 1 indicating better reliability. We aimed to estimate the ICC of the postprandial blood glucose response to glucose and white bread, instant mashed potato and chickpeas using the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) and the GI of these foods. The iAUC values were determined in twenty healthy individuals on three and four occasions for white bread and glucose, respectively, and for potato and chickpeas on a single occasion. The ICC of the iAUC for white bread and glucose were 0·50 (95 % CI 0·27, 0·73) and 0·49 (95 % CI 0·22, 0·75), respectively. The mean GI of white bread was 81 (95 % CI 74, 90) with a reliability of 0·27 indicating substantial within-person variability. The GI of mashed potato and chickpeas were 87 (95 % CI 76, 101) and 28 (95 % CI 22, 37) respectively with ICC of 0·02 and 0·40.The ICC of the iAUC were moderate and those of the GI fair or poor, indicating the heterogeneous nature of individuals' responses. The unpredictability of individual responses even if they are the result of day-to-day variation places limitations on the clinical usefulness of GI. If the very different GI of potato and chickpeas are estimates of an individual's every-day response to different foods, then the GI of foods may provide an indication of the GI of a long-term diet.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Another approach to estimating the reliability of glycaemic index
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Another approach to estimating the reliability of glycaemic index
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Another approach to estimating the reliability of glycaemic index
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr Sheila Williams, fax +64 3 479 7298, email sheila.williams@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
References
Hide All
1Wolever TM, Jenkins DJ, Jenkins AL & Josse RG (1991) The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. Am J Clin Nutr 54, 846854.
2Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, Bowling AC, Newman HC, Jenkins AL & Goff DV (1981) Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 34, 362366.
3Ludwig DS (2003) Dietary glycemic index and the regulation of body weight. Lipids 38, 117121.
4Pi-Sunyer FX (2002) Glycemic index and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 290S298S.
5Sheard NF, Clark NG, Brand-Miller JC, Franz MJ, Pi-Sunyer FX, Mayer-Davis E, Kulkarni K & Geil P (2004) Dietary carbohydrate (amount and type) in the prevention and management of diabetes: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 27, 22662271.
6Wolever TM, Vorster HH, Björck I, et al. (2003) Determination of the glycaemic index of foods: interlaboratory study. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 475482.
7Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL & Willett WC (1997) Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 277, 472477.
8Kalergis M, Pytka E, Yale JF, Mayo N & Strychar I (2006) Canadian dietitians’ use and perceptions of glycemic index in diabetes management. Can J Diet Pract Res 67, 2127.
9Anonymous (1998) Carbohydrates in human nutrition. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. FAO Food Nutr Pap 66, 1140.
10Fleiss JL (1986) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11Wolover T (2006) The Glycaemic Index: a Physiological Classification of Dietary Carbohydrate. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
12Allison DB (1993) Limitations of coefficient of variation as index of measurement reliability. Nutrition 9, 559561.
13Bartko JJ & Carpenter WT Jr (1976) On the methods and theory of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis 163, 307317.
14Dunn G (1992) Design and analysis of reliability studies. Stat Meth Med Res 1, 123157.
15Venn BJ, Wallace AJ, Monro JA, Perry T, Brown R, Frampton C & Green TJ (2006) The glycemic load estimated from the glycemic index does not differ greatly from that measured using a standard curve in healthy volunteers. J Nutr 136, 13771381.
16Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1998) Method 996.11: Starch (Total) in Cereal Products, Amyloglucosidase–α-Amylase Method (Total Starch Assay). Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International.
17Quan H & Shih WJ (2006) Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models. Biometrics 52, 11951203.
18Cook NR (1996) Estimating predictive values for blood pressure measurements from multivariate regression models with covariates. Stat Med 15, 20132028.
19Irwig L, Glasziou P, Wilson A & Macaskill P (1991) Estimating an individual's true cholesterol level and response to intervention. JAMA 266, 16781685.
20StataCorp (2005) Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
21Matthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ & Royston P (1990) Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ 300, 230235.
22Brand-Miller J, Wolever TM, Foster-Powell K & Colaguiri S (2003) The New Glucose Revolution. New York: Marlowe & Company.
23Feskens EJ, Bowles CH & Kromhout D (1991) Intra- and interindividual variability of glucose tolerance in an elderly population. J Clin Epid 44, 947953.
24McDonald GW, Fisher GF & Burnham C (1965) Reproducibility of the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes 14, 473480.
25Mooy JM, Grootenhuis PA, de Vries H, Kostense PJ, Popp-Snijders C, Bouter LM & Heine RJ (1996) Intra-individual variation of glucose, specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: the Hoorn Study. Diabetologia 39, 298305.
26Davidson MB (2002) Counterpoint: the oral glucose tolerance test is superfluous. Diabetes Care 25, 18831885.
27Wolever TM, Csima A, Jenkins DJ, Wong GS & Josse RG (1989) The glycemic index: variation between subjects and predictive difference. J Am Coll Nutr 8, 235247.
28Levy J, Morris R, Hammersley M & Turner R (1999) Discrimination, adjusted correlation, and equivalence of imprecise tests: application to glucose tolerance. Am J Physiol 276, E365E375.
29Hatonen KA, Simila ME, Virtamo JR, Eriksson JG, Hannila M-L, Sinkko HK, Sundvall JE, Mykkanen HM & Valstra LM (2006) Methodologic considerations in the measurement of glycemic index: glycemic response to rye bread, oatmeal porridge, and mashed potato. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 10551061.
30Sugiyama M, Tang AC, Wakaki Y & Koyama W (2003) Glycemic index of single and mixed meal foods among common Japanese foods with white rice as a reference food. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 743752.
31Keene ON (1995) The log transformation is special. Stat Med 14, 811819.
32Bland JM & Altman DG (1996) The use of transformation when comparing two means. BMJ 312, 1153.
33Hulley SB & Cummings SR (1988) Designing Clinical Research. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
34Foster-Powell K, Holt SH & Brand-Miller JC (2002) International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 556.
35Peter JP, Churchill G Jr & Brown TJ (1993) Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. J Consum Res 19, 655662.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 177 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.