Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Can Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) discriminate among essential minerals in their diet?

  • Francisco Ceacero (a1) (a2) (a3), Tomás Landete-Castillejos (a1) (a2) (a3), Andrés J. García (a1) (a2) (a3), José A. Estévez (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4) and Laureano Gallego (a1)...
Abstract

Optimal foraging predicts that animals should be able to assess the content of important nutrients in food. Ungulates discriminate salt and P, but discrimination of other minerals is controversial even though they are also essential and often limiting. Animal scientists have explained this taste through palatability, which predicts the same pattern of discrimination for calves and hinds and greater consumption by the latter. Social learning may also be involved, predicting a correlation between mother and calf and less consumption by the latter. The present study examines the consumption behaviour of free-choice supplemented minerals by hinds and calves of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) to discern between these hypotheses. Behavioural indices of intake correlated with actual mineral consumption (P < 0·001). Mother and calf behavioural indices correlated only for salt-mixed minerals. Calves showed overall behavioural indices of consumption greater than hinds (P < 0·01 and P < 0·001), and also for all single supplements except NaCl, as expected from growth needs and in contrast to the palatability hypothesis. Calves showed a greater consumption of CuSO4 and lower of Na2SeO3 than pure salt. Hinds showed a different pattern, ingesting lower amounts of all minerals except CuSO4 and salt. Additional analyses also showed discrimination between minerals unmixed with salt, such as CaHPO4 and CaCO3 (P = 0·012 and P = 0·020). The greater intake of growing calves and the different consumption patterns for hinds and calves suggest that deer can discriminate among minerals, and that they do not consume minerals for their palatability or driven by social learning. Therefore, deer may be selecting minerals according to nutritional requirements.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Can Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) discriminate among essential minerals in their diet?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Can Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) discriminate among essential minerals in their diet?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Can Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) discriminate among essential minerals in their diet?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr Francisco Ceacero, fax +34 967 599233, email francisco.ceacero@uclm.es
References
Hide All
1Emlen, JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preferences. Am Nat 100, 611617.
2McArthur, RH & Pianka, E (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100, 603609.
3Stephens, DW & Krebs, JR (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4Wilmshurst, JF, Fryxell, JM & Hudson, RJ (1995) Forage quality and patch choice by wapiti (Cervus elaphus). Behav Ecol 6, 209217.
5Wilmshurst, JF, Fryxell, JM & Colucci, PE (1999) What constrains daily intake in Thomson's gazelles? Ecology 80, 23382347.
6Hessle, A, Rutter, M & Wallin, K (2008) Effect of breed, season and pasture moisture gradient on foraging behaviour in cattle on semi-natural grasslands. Appl Anim Behav Sci 111, 108119.
7Owen-Smith, N & Novellie, P (1982) What should a clever ungulate eat? Am Nat 119, 151178.
8Ackroff, K (1992) Foraging for macronutrients: effects of protein availability and abundance. Physiol Behav 51, 533542.
9Westoby, M (1974) An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. Am Nat 108, 290304.
10Harborne, JB (1982) Introduction to Ecological Biochemistry. London: Academic Press.
11Hughes, RN (1993) Diet Selection: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Foraging Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
12Belovsky, GE (1978) Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor Popul Biol 14, 105134.
13Botkin, DB, Jordan, PA, Dominsky, AS, et al. (1973) Sodium dynamics in a northern ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70, 27452748.
14Hellgren, EC & Pitts, WJ (1997) Sodium economy in white-tailed deer (Odoicoleus virginianus). Physiol Zool 70, 547555.
15McDowell, LR (1996) Feeding minerals to cattle on pasture. Anim Feed Sci Technol 60, 247271.
16McDowell, LR (2003) Minerals in Animal and Human Nutrition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17McNaughton, SJ (1988) Mineral nutrition and spatial concentrations of African ungulates. Nature 334, 343345.
18McNaughton, SJ (1990) Mineral nutrition and seasonal movements of African migratory ungulates. Nature 345, 613615.
19Seagle, SW & McNaughton, SJ (1992) Spatial variation in forage nutrient concentrations and the distribution of Serengeti grazing ungulates. Landscape Ecol 70, 229241.
20Tracy, BF & McNaughton, SJ (1995) Elemental analysis of mineral lick soils from the Serengeti National Park, the Konza Prairie and Yellowstone National Park. Ecography 18, 9194.
21Atwood, TC & Weeks, HP (2002) Sex- and age-specific patterns of mineral lick use by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Am Midl Nat 148, 289296.
22Barrows, GT (1977) Research efforts have lagged in free-choice feeding. Anim Nutr Health 32, 1214.
23Ben-Shahar, R & Coe, MJ (1992) The relationship between soil factors, grass nutrients and the foraging behaviour of wildebeest and zebra. Oecologia 90, 422428.
24Richter, CP (1943) Total self-regulatory functions in animals and human beings. Harvey Lect 38, 63103.
25Fielder, PC (1986) Implications of selenium levels in Washington mountain goats, mule deer, and Rocky Mountain elk. Northwest Sci 60, 1520.
26Ceacero, F, Landete-Castillejos, T, García, AJ, et al. (2009) Free-choice mineral consumption in Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) response to diet deficiencies. Livest Sci 122, 345348.
27Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD & Hall, JO (2008) Learned appetites for calcium, phosphorus, and sodium in sheep. J Anim Sci 86, 738747.
28Kyriazakis, I, Tolkamp, BJ & Emmans, G (1999) Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework. Proc Nutr Soc 58, 765772.
29Provenza, FD (1995) Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J Range Manage 48, 217.
30McDowell, LR (1985) Nutrition of Grazing Ruminants in Warm Climates. New York: Academic Press.
31Muller, LD, Schaffer, LV, Ham, LC, et al. (1977) Cafeteria-style free-choice mineral feeder for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 60, 15741582.
32Tait, RM & Fisher, LJ (1996) Variability in individual animal's intake of minerals offered free-choice to grazing ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 62, 6976.
33Duncan, AJ & Young, SA (2002) Can goats learn about foods through conditioned food aversions and preferences when multiple food options are simultaneously available? J Anim Sci 80, 20912098.
34Kissileff, HR (1991) Chance and necessity in ingestive behaviour. Appetite 14, 122.
35Sclafani, A (1991) Conditioned food preferences. B Psychonomic Soc 29, 256260.
36Provenza, FD, Burritt, EA, Clausen, TP, et al. (1990) Conditioned flavour aversion: a mechanism for goats to avoid condensed tannins in blackbrush. Am Nat 136, 810828.
37Jansen, DAWAM, van Langevelde, F, de Boer, WF, et al. (2007) Optimisation or satiation, testing diet selection rules in goats. Small Rumin Res 73, 160168.
38Kronberg, SL, Muntifering, RB & Ayers, EL (1993) Feed aversion learning in cattle with delayed negative consequences. J Anim Sci 71, 17671770.
39Kyriazakis, I, Papachristou, TG, Duncan, AJ, et al. (1997) Mild conditioned food aversions developed by sheep towards flavours associated with plant secondary compounds. J Chem Ecol 23, 727746.
40Arnold, GW (1981) Grazing behaviour. Grazing Animals, pp. 79104 [Morley, FW, editor]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
41Villalba, JJ & Provenza, FD (1997) Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of acetate and propionate. J Anim Sci 75, 29052914.
42Ginane, C, Duncan, AJ, Young, SA, et al. (2005) Herbivore diet selection in response to simulated variation in nutrient rewards and plant secondary compounds. Anim Behav 69, 541550.
43Sclafani, A (1997) Learned controls of ingestive behaviour. Appetite 29, 153158.
44Duncan, AJ, Elwert, C, Villalba, JJ, et al. (2007) How does pattern of feeding and rate of nutrient delivery influence conditioned food preferences? Oecologia 153, 617624.
45van Wieren, SE (1996) Do large herbivores select a diet that maximizes short-term energy intake rate? Forest Ecol Manage 88, 149156.
46Yearsley, J, Villalba, JJ, Gordon, IJ, et al. (2006) A theory of associating food types with their post-ingestive effects. Am Nat 167, 705716.
47Duncan, AJ, Ginane, C, Elston, DA, et al. (2006) How do herbivores trade-off the positive and negative consequences of diet selection decisions? Anim Behav 71, 9399.
48Zahorik, DM & Houpt, KA (1977) The concept of nutritional wisdom: applicability of laboratory learning models to large herbivores. In Learning Mechanisms in Food Selection, pp. 4567 [Barker, LM, Best, M and Domjan, M, editors]. Waco: Baylor University Press.
49Zahorik, DM & Houpt, KA (1981) Species differences in feeding strategies, food hazards and the ability to learn food aversions. In Foraging Behavior, pp. 289310 [Kamil, AC and Sargent, TD, editors]. New York: Garland.
50Bergvall, UA (2009) Development of feeding selectivity and consistency in food choice over 5 years in fallow deer. Behav Process 80, 140146.
51Paik, I (2001) Application of chelated minerals in animal production. Asian Austral J Anim 14, 191198.
52Llorens, J (2004) The physiology of taste and smell: how and why we sense flavours. Water Sci Technol 49, 110.
53Ingvartsen, KL (1994) Models of voluntary food intake in cattle. Livest Prod Sci 39, 1938.
54West, DB & York, B (1998) Dietary fat, genetic predisposition, and obesity: lessons from animal models. Am J Clin Nutr 67, 505S512S.
55Lieberman, LS (2006) Evolutionary and anthropological perspectives on optimal foraging in obesogenic environments. Appetite 47, 39.
56Thornton, A & Raihani, NJ (2008) The evolution of teaching. Anim Behav 75, 18231836.
57Landete-Castillejos, T, García, AJ, Garde, JJ, et al. (2000) Milk intake and production curves and allosuckling in captive Iberian red deer, Cervus elaphus hispanicus. Anim Behav 60, 679687.
58Brelurut, A, Pingard, A & Thériez, M (1990) Le Cerf et son Élevage (The Stag and its Breeding). Paris: INRA.
59Ward, M & Lardy, G (2005) Beef Cattle Mineral Nutrition. North Dakota: NDSU Extension Service.
60Arthington, JD (2002) Essential Trace Minerals for Grazing Cattle in Florida. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
61Blaxter, KL, Kay, RNB, Sharman, GAM, et al. (1988) Farming the Red Deer. Edinburgh: H.M. Stationery Office for the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland.
62Gallego, L, Landete-Castillejos, T, García, AJ, et al. (2006) Seasonal and lactational changes in mineral composition of milk from Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). J Dairy Sci 89, 589595.
63Landete-Castillejos, T, García, AJ, Molina, P, et al. (2000) Milk production and composition in captive Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus): effect of birth date. J Anim Sci 78, 27712777.
64Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour (2008) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 75, IIIX.
65Atwood, TC & Weeks, HP (2003) Sex-specific patterns of mineral lick preference in white-tailed deer. Northeast Nat 10, 409414.
66Best, DA, Lynch, GM & Rongstad, OJ (1977) Annual spring movements of moose to mineral licks in Swan Hills Alberta. Trans N Am Moose Conf Workshop 13, 215228.
67Bartoskewitz, ML, Hewitt, DG, Laurenz, JC, et al. (2007) Effect of dietary copper and zinc concentrations on white-tailed deer antler growth, body size, and immune system function. Small Ruminant Res 73, 8794.
68Carrión, D, García, AJ, Gaspar-López, E, et al. (2008) Development of body condition in hinds of Iberian red deer during gestation and its effects on calf birth weight and milk production. J Exp Zool 309A 110.
69Epke, EM & Lawless, HT (2007) Retronasal smell and detection thresholds of iron and copper salts. Physiol Behav 92, 487491.
70Pletscher, DH (1987) Nutrient budgets for white-tailed deer in New England with special reference to sodium. J Mammal 68, 330336.
71Chládek, G & Zapletal, D (2007) A free-choice intake of mineral blocks in beef cows during the grazing season and in winter. Livest Sci 106, 4146.
72Gallego, L, Gomez, JA, Landete-Castillejos, T, et al. (2009) Effect of milk minerals on calf gains and sex differences in mineral composition of milk from Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Reproduction (epublication ahead of print version 5 August 2009).
73Zuberbuehler, CA, Messikommer, RE & Wenk, C (2007) Choice feeding of selenium-deficient laying hens affects diet selection, selenium intake and body weight. J Nutr 132, 34113417.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed