Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-vjhkx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-01T19:54:33.142Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of functional food consumers and dietary supplement users

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Nynke de Jong*
Department of Chronic Diseases Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, The Netherlands
Marga C. Ocké
Department of Chronic Diseases Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, The Netherlands
Hester A. C. Branderhorst
NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Roland Friele
NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
*Corresponding author: Dr Nynke de Jong, fax +31 30 274 4407, email
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


Core share and HTML view are not possible as this article does not have html content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Functional foods and/or supplements may be used in the context of a healthy lifestyle or as a means to compensate for an unhealthy lifestyle. Adverse long-term and/or cumulative effects of functional food or supplement intake are of public health concern; it is therefore important to identify functional food and supplement users. The present study compared Dutch functional food and supplement consumers with non-consumers with regard to demographic and lifestyle factors. The consumption of the most common functional foods and supplements in 2000 was studied (yoghurt with extra lactic acid bacteria, cholesterol-lowering margarine, lemonade and sweets with extra vitamins and minerals, milk and margarine with extra Ca, Ca tablets, multivitamin and mineral supplements, and Echinacea supplements). Data were obtained from self-administered questionnaires filled in by a consumer panel, aged 19–91 years (response rate 76 %, n 1183), representative of the Dutch population. The number of daily consumers of functional foods or supplements appeared to be relatively low (daily use of multivitamin and mineral supplements, 20 %; all other products, 3–9 %). Explanatory variables depended on the type of product; but gender, age, education, and vegetable intake were significant factors in the logistic regression model. Consumption of cholesterol-lowering margarines was more likely to be reported by individuals with a poorer subjective health (odds ratio 2·62 (95 % CI 1·15, 6·05)) and by smokers (odds ratio 2·93 (95 % CI 1·34, 6·40)). In conclusion, determinants of functional food or supplement use depended on the type of product, so generalisation of consumer characteristics over different foods is not legitimate. In addition to research on lifestyle factors, surveys about consumers' attitudes, norms and knowledge regarding functional foods in relation to actual dietary patterns and health risk profiles are necessary.

Research Article
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2003


Anttolainen, M, Luoto, R, Uutela, A, Boice, JD Jr, Blot, WJ, McLaughlin, JK & Puska, P (2001) Characteristics of users and nonusers of plant stanol ester margarine in Finland: an approach to study functional foods. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101, 13651368.Google Scholar
Block, G, Cox, C, Madans, J, Schreiber, GB, Licitra, L & Melia, N (1988) Vitamin supplement use, by demographic characteristics. American Journal of Epidemiology 127, 297309.Google Scholar
Centrum voor Volksgezondheid en Toekomst Verkenningen and Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid (2001) National Institute of Public Health and the Environment and Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. Scholar
Childs, NM & Poryzees, GH (1998) Foods that help prevent disease: consumer attitudes and public policy implications. British Food Journal 100, 419426.Google Scholar
Friele, RD, Bakker, RHC & Vaessen, Y (1996) De Logboekjes Tegen het Licht – Bruikbaarheid van het Medisch Logboek Consumentenpanel Gezondheidszorg 1993–1995 (The log-books Evaluate – Usefulness of the Medical Log-books in the Health Services Consumer Panel 1993–1995). Utrecht and Den Haag, The Netherlands: NIVEL/Consumentenbond.Google Scholar
Greger, JL (2001) Dietary supplement use: consumer characteristics and interests. Journal of Nutrition 131, 1339S1343S.Google Scholar
Hasler, CM (2000) The Changing Face of Functional Foods. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 19, 499S506S.Google Scholar
Hathcock, JN (1997) Vitamins and minerals: efficacy and safety. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 66, 427437.Google Scholar
Hilliam, M (1996) Functional Foods: the Western consumer viewpoint. Nutrition Reviews 54, S189S194.Google Scholar
Jacobson, MF & Silverglade, B (1999) Functional foods: health boon or quackery? British Medical Journal 319, 205206.Google Scholar
Jonas, MS & Beckmann, SC (1998) Functional Foods: Consumer Perceptions in Denmark and England. MAPP working paper no. 55. Aarhus, Denmark: Centre for Market Surveillance, Research and Strategy for the Food Sector.Google Scholar
Kirk, SFL, Cade, JE, Barrett, JH & Conner, M (1999) Diet and lifestyle characteristics associated with dietary supplement use in women. Public Health Nutrition 2, 6973.Google Scholar
Kristal, AR, Hedderson, MM, Patterson, RE & Neuhouser, ML (2001) Predictors of self-initiated, healthful dietary change. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101, 762766.Google Scholar
Lyle, BJ, Mares-Perlman, JA, Klein, BE, Klein, R & Greger, JL (1998) Supplement users differ from nonusers in demographic, lifestyle, dietary and health characteristics. Journal of Nutrition 128, 23552362.Google Scholar
Milner, JA (1999) Functional Foods and Health Promotion. Journal of Nutrition 129, 1395S1397S.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, ML, Patterson, RE & Levy, L (1999) Motivations for using vitamin and mineral supplements. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 99, 851854.Google Scholar
Ocké, MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita, HB, Goddijn, HE, Jansen, A, Pols, MA, van Staveren, WA & Kromhout, D (1997) The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. International Journal of Epidemiology 26, Suppl. 1, S37S48.Google Scholar
Patterson, RE, Neuhouser, ML, White, E, Hunt, J & Kristal, AR (1998) Cancer-related Behavior of Vitamin Supplement Users. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 7, 7981.Google Scholar
Pitman, S & Reinhardt, W (2000) Functional Foods: Attitudinal Research. Washington, DC: International Food Information Council (IFIC) Foundation.Google Scholar
Radimer, KL, Subar, AF & Thompson, FE (2000) Nonvitamin, nonmineral dietary supplements: issues and findings from NHANES III. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 100, 447454.Google Scholar
Sparling, MC & Anderson, JJB (2001) Modified Foods in the Marketplace. Nutrition Today 36, 212214.Google Scholar
Wallström, P, Elmståhl, S, Hanson, BS, Östergren, P-O, Johansson, U, Janzon, L & Larsson, SA (1996) Demographic and psychosocial characteristics of middle-aged women and men who use dietary supplements. European Journal of Public Health 6, 188195.Google Scholar
Wrick, KL (1995) Consumer issues and expectations for functional foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 35, 167173.Google Scholar