Skip to main content
×
Home

Impact of food supplementation on weight loss in randomised-controlled dietary intervention trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Cinthya Wibisono (a1), Yasmine Probst (a2), Elizabeth Neale (a2) and Linda Tapsell (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Dietary trials provide evidence for practice and policy guidelines, but poor adherence may confound results. Food supplementation may improve adherence to dietary interventions, but the impact of supplementation on study outcomes is not known. The aim of this review was to examine the impact of food supplementation on weight loss in dietary intervention trials. The databases Scopus, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for dietary intervention trials published between January 2004 and March 2015 using the following keyword combinations: ‘trial’ OR ‘intervention’, ‘food’ OR ‘diet’, ‘weight loss’ and ‘adherence’ OR ‘adherence’. Studies were included if food was provided to at least one study group and both ‘weight change’ and ‘adherence’ were reported. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess weighted mean differences (WMD) in body weight (change or final mean values). The included studies formed two groups: trials involving an intervention group supplemented with a food and a control without food supplementation (food v. no food), and trials in which food was provided to all subjects (food v. food) (PROSPERO registration: CRD42015017563). In total, sixteen studies were included. Significant weight reduction was reported in the food v. no food studies (WMD −0·74 kg; 95 % CI −1·40, −0·08; P=0·03, I 2=63 %). A non-significant increase in weight was found among the food v. food studies (WMD 0·84 kg; 95 % CI −0·60, 2·27; P=0·25, I 2=0 %). Food supplementation appeared to result in greater weight loss in dietary trials. Energy restrictions and intensity of interventions were other significant factors influencing weight loss.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Impact of food supplementation on weight loss in randomised-controlled dietary intervention trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Impact of food supplementation on weight loss in randomised-controlled dietary intervention trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Impact of food supplementation on weight loss in randomised-controlled dietary intervention trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: C. Wibisono, email cw426@uowmail.edu.au
References
Hide All
1. Jacobs DRJP, Tapsell LCP & Temple NJP (2011) Food synergy: the key to balancing the nutrition research effort. Public Health Rev 33, 123.
2. Wing RR & Jeffery RW (2001) Food provision as a strategy to promote weight loss. Obes Res 9, Suppl. 4, 271S275SS.
3. Wing RR (1997) Food provision in dietary intervention studies. Am J Clin Nutr 66, 421422.
4. Jeffery RW, Wing RR., Thorson C, et al. (1993) Strengthening behavioral interventions for weight loss: a randomized trial of food provision and monetary incentives. J Consult Clin Psychol 61, 10381045.
5. Estruch R, Martínez-González MA, Corella D, et al. (2006) Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on cardiovascular risk factors: a randomized trial. Ann Int Med 145, 111.
6. Appel LJ & Van Horn LP (2013) Did the PREDIMED trial test a Mediterranean diet? N Engl J Med 368, 13531354.
7. Martínez-González , Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. (2012) Cohort profile: Design and methods of the PREDIMED study. Int J Epidemiol 41, 377385.
8. Tapsell L, Batterham M, Huang XF, et al. (2010) Short term effects of energy restriction and dietary fat sub-type on weight loss and disease risk factors. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 20, 317325.
9. Tapsell LC, Dunning A, Warensjo E, et al. (2014) Effects of vegetable consumption on weight loss: a review of the evidence with implications for design of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54, 15291538.
10. Metz JA, Kris-Etherton PM, Morris CD, et al. (1997) Dietary compliance and cardiovascular risk reduction with a prepared meal plan compared with a self-selected diet. Am J Clin Nutr 66, 373385.
11. Spahn JMR, Rebecca S, Keim KS, et al. (2010) State of the evidence regarding behavior change theories and strategies in nutrition counseling to facilitate health and food behavior change. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 879891.
12. Burke LE, Styn MA, Steenkiste AR, et al. (2006) A randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management: preliminary results of the impact of diet at 6 months – PREFER Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14, 20072017.
13. Williamson DA, Anton SD, Han H, et al. (2010) Adherence is a multi-dimensional construct in the POUNDS LOST trial. J Behav Med 33, 3546.
14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6, e1000097.
15. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (2012) Evidence Analysis Manual: Steps in the Academy Evidence Analysis Process. Chicago, IL: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
16. World Health Organization (1995) Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry: Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: WHO.
17. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327, 557560.
18. Wien M, Oda K & Sabate J (2014) A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of incorporating peanuts into an American Diabetes Association meal plan on the nutrient profile of the total diet and cardiometabolic parameters of adults with type 2 diabetes. Nutr J 13, 10.
19. Whybrow S, Mayer C, Kirk TR, et al. (2007) Effects of two weeks’ mandatory snack consumption on energy intake and energy balance. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15, 673685.
20. Baxheinrich A, Stratmann B, Lee-Barkey YH, et al. (2012) Effects of a rapeseed oil-enriched hypoenergetic diet with a high content of α-linolenic acid on body weight and cardiovascular risk profile in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Br J Nutr 108, 682691.
21. Hannum SM, Carson L, Evans EM, et al. (2004) Use of portion-controlled entrees enhances weight loss in women. Obes Res 12, 538546.
22. Kristensen M, Toubro S, Jensen MG, et al. (2012) Whole grain compared with refined wheat decreases the percentage of body fat following a 12-week, energy-restricted dietary intervention in postmenopausal women. J Nutr 142, 710716.
23. Sabaté J, Cordero-MacIntyre Z, Siapco G, et al. (2009) Does regular walnut consumption lead to weight gain? Br J Nutr 94, 859864.
24. Crichton GE, Howe PRC, Buckley JD, et al. (2012) Dairy consumption and cardiometabolic health: outcomes of a 12-month crossover trial. Nutr Metab (Lond) 9, 19.
25. Murphy KJ, Thomson RL, Coates AM, et al. (2012) Effects of eating fresh lean pork on cardiometabolic health parameters. Nutrients 4, 711723.
26. Tate DF, Turner-McGrievy G, Lyons E, et al. (2012) Replacing caloric beverages with water or diet beverages for weight loss in adults: main results of the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 95, 555563.
27. Waller SM, Vander Wal JS, Klurfeld DM, et al. (2004) Evening ready-to-eat cereal consumption contributes to weight management. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 316321.
28. Akers JD, Cornett RA, Savla JS, et al. (2012) Daily self-monitoring of body weight, step count, fruit/vegetable intake, and water consumption: a feasible and effective long-term weight loss maintenance approach. J Acad Nutri Diet 112, 685692; e2.
29. Salas-Salvadó J, Bulló M, Estruch R, et al. (2014) Prevention of diabetes with Mediterranean diets: a subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 160, 110.
30. Thorsdottir I, Tomasson H, Gunnarsdottir I, et al. (2007) Randomized trial of weight-loss-diets for young adults varying in fish and fish oil content. Int J Obes (Lond) 31, 15601566.
31. Zemel MB, Teegarden D, Van Loan M, et al. (2009) Dairy-rich diets augment fat loss on an energy-restricted diet: a multicenter trial. Nutrients 1, 83100.
32. Piehowski KE, Preston AG, Miller DL, et al. (2011) A reduced-calorie dietary pattern including a daily sweet snack promotes body weight reduction and body composition improvements in premenopausal women who are overweight and obese: a pilot study. J Am Diet Assoc 111, 11981203.
33. Tonstad S, Malik N & Haddad E (2014) A high-fibre bean-rich diet versus a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. J Hum Nutr Diet 27, Suppl. 2, 109116.
34. Thorsdottir I, Birgisdottir BE, Kiely M, et al. (2009) Fish consumption among young overweight European adults and compliance to varying seafood content in four weight loss intervention diets. Public Health Nutr 12, 592598.
35. Labayen I, Dı́ez N, Parra D, et al. (2004) Basal and postprandial substrate oxidation rates in obese women receiving two test meals with different protein content. Clin Nutr 23, 571578.
36. Tapsell LC, Batterham MJ, Thorne RL, et al. (2014) Weight loss effects from vegetable intake: a 12-month randomised controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 778785.
37. Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, et al. (2011) Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med 364, 23922404.
38. Svendsen M, Blomhoff R, Holme I, et al. (2007) The effect of an increased intake of vegetables and fruit on weight loss, blood pressure and antioxidant defense in subjects with sleep related breathing disorders. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 13011311.
39. Digenio AG, Mancuso JP, Gerber RA, et al. (2009) Comparison of methods for delivering a lifestyle modification program for obese patients: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 150, 255262.
40. Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, et al. (2009) Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 360, 859873.
41. Bartfield JK, Stevens VJ, Jerome GJ, et al. (2011) Behavioral transitions and weight change patterns within the PREMIER trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19, 16091615.
42. Crichton GE, Howe PRC, Buckley JD, et al. (2012) Long-term dietary intervention trials: critical issues and challenges. Trials 13, 111.
43. Kuhnle GGC (2012) Nutritional biomarkers for objective dietary assessment. J Sci Food Agric 92, 11451149.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Wibisono supplementary material
File S4

 Word (28 KB)
28 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Wibisono supplementary material
File S1

 Word (20 KB)
20 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Wibisono supplementary material
File S2

 Word (15 KB)
15 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 219
Total number of PDF views: 718 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1778 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.