Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans

  • J. Tomlin (a1) and N. W. Read (a1)
Abstract

Starch that is resistant to human amylases forms during the cooking and subsequent cooling of some foods, and may therefore be a substrate for the bacterial flora of the colon. It is thus possible that resistant starch (RS) will affect colon function in a similar manner to non-starch polysaccharides. To test this theory, a group of eight volunteers took two diet supplements for 1 week each in a random order with a 1 week separation. One supplement comprised mainly 350 g Cornflakes/d and the other 380 g Rice Krispies/d, providing 10.33 and 0.86 g RS/.d respectively. The amounts of amylase-digestible starch, non-starch polysaccharides, total carbohydrate, energy, protein and fat were balanced between the two periods by giving small amounts of Casilan, wheat bran, butter and boiled sweets. The volunteers made faecal collections during day 3 to day 7 of each period. Whole-gut transit time was calculated using the continuous method. Stool consistency and ease of defaecation were assessed by the volunteers. All episodes of flatulence noticed were recorded in a diary, along with food intake. Serial breath hydrogen measurements were made at 15 min intervals for 8 h on day 1 of each supplement. Questionnaires regarding colon function were completed at the end of each dietary period. There were no significant differences in the stool mass, frequency or consistency, ease of defaecations, transit time or flatulence experienced during the two supplements (P > 0.05). Significantly more H2 (area under curve) was produced while eating Cornflakes than Rice Krispies (P < 0.05). The difference of 9.47 g RS/d between the two diets was over three times the calculated normal daily RS intake of 2.76 g/d. As the only significant difference observed was in the breath H2 excretion on day 1, we suggest that either RS is rapidly and completely fermented to end-products including H2 gas, which is subsequently excreted via the lungs and has little influence on colon function, or that bacterial adaptation removed any observable effect on faecal mass and transit time by day 3.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. H. Cummings , D. J. A. Jenkins & H. S. Wiggins (1976). Measurement of the mean transit time of dietary residue through the human gut. Gut 17, 210218.

G. J. Davies , M. Crowder , B. Reid & J. W. T. Dickerson (1986). Bowel function measurements of individuals with different eating patterns. Gut 27, 164169.

M. L. Dreher , C. J. Dreher & J. W. Berry (1984). Starch digestibility of foods: a nutritional perspective. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 20, 4771.

H. N. Englyst , V. Anderson & J. H. Cummings (1983). Starch and NSP in some cereal foods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 14341440.

H. N. Englyst & J. H. Cummings (1984). Simplified method for the measurement of total NSP by GLC of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 109, 937942.

H. N. Englyst & G. T. MacFarlane (1986). Breakdown of resistant and readily digestible starch by human gut bacteria. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 699706.

B. Flourie , C. Florent , J. Jouany -P., P. Thivend , F. Etanchaud & J. C. Rambaud (1986). Colonic metabolism of wheat starch in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 90, 111119.

A. M. Stephen & J. H. Cummings (1980). Microbial contribution to human faecal mass. Journal of Medical Microbiology 13, 4556.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: