Skip to main content
×
Home

Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction

  • S. Gabor (a1), H. Renner (a1), V. Matzi (a1), B. Ratzenhofer (a2), J. Lindenmann (a1), O. Sankin (a1), H. Pinter (a1), A. Maier (a1), J. Smolle (a1) and F. M. Smolle-Jüttner (a1)...
Abstract

After resective and reconstructive surgery in the gastrointestinal tract, oral feeding is traditionally avoided in order to minimize strain to the anastomoses and to reduce the inherent risks of the postoperatively impaired gastrointestinal motility. However, studies have given evidence that the small bowel recovers its ability to absorb nutrients almost immediately following surgery, even in the absence of peristalsis, and that early enteral feeding would preserve both the integrity of gut mucosa and its immunological function. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of early enteral feeding on the postoperative course following oesophagectomy or oesophagogastrectomy, and reconstruction. Between May 1999 and November 2002, forty-four consecutive patients (thirty-eight males and six females; mean age 62, range 30–82) with oesophageal carcinoma (stages I–III), who had undergone radical resection and reconstruction, entered this study (early enteral feeding group; EEF). A historical group of forty-four patients (thirty-seven males and seven females; mean age 64, range 41–79; stages I–III) resected between January 1997 and March 1999 served as control (parenteral feeding group; PF). The duration of both postoperative stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the total hospital stay, perioperative complications and the overall mortality were compared. Early enteral feeding was administered over the jejunal line of a Dobhoff tube. It started 6 h postoperatively at a rate of 10 ml/h for 6 h with stepwise increase until total enteral nutrition was achieved on day 6. In the controls oral enteral feeding was begun on day 7. If compared to the PF group, EEF patients recovered faster considering the duration of both stay in the ICU and in the hospital. There was a significant difference in the interval until the first bowel movements. No difference in overall 30 d mortality was identified. A poor nutritional status was a significant prognostic factor for an increased mortality. Early enteral feeding significantly reduces the duration of ICU treatment and total hospital stay in patients who undergo oesophagectomy or oesophagogastrectomy for oesophageal carcinoma. The mortality rate is not affected.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after oesophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr S. Gabor, fax +43 316 385 4679, email Sabine.Gabor@meduni-graz.at
References
Hide All
ASPEN Board of Directors (2002) Guidelines for the use of parenteral, enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric care. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 26, 9SA12SA
Baeten C & Hoefnagels J (1992) Feeding via nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 27, Suppl. 194, 9598.
Bastian L & Weimann A (2002) Immunonutrition in patients after trauma. Br J Nutr 87, Suppl. 1, 133134.
Bone RC, Sibbald WJ & Sprung CL (1992) The ACCP-SCCM Consensus Conference on sepsis and organ failure. Chest 101, 14811483.
Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Cestari A, Profili M, Di Carlo V (1995) Benefits of early postoperative enteral feeling in cancer patients. Infusionther Transfusionmed 22, 280284.
Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG & De Meester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak and striature of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198, 536541.
Eddy VA, Snell JE & Morris JA (1996) Analysis of complications and long-term outcome of trauma patients with needle catheter jejunostomy. Am Surg 62, 4044.
Furst H, Hartl WH, Lohe F & Schildberg FW (2000) Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: an alternative technique based on the use of the right colon. Ann Surg 231, 173178.
Hochwald SN, Harrison LE, Heslin MJ, Burt ME & Brennan MF (1997) Early postoperative enteral feeding improves whole body protein kinetics in upper gastrointestinal cancer patients. Am J Surg 174, 325330.
Kiyama T, Efron DT, Tantry U & Barbul A (1999) Effect of nutritional route on colonic anastomotic healing in the rat. J Gastrointest Surg 3, 441446.
Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, Minare G, Tolley EA, Porci A, Kuhl MR & Brown RO (1992) Enteral versus parenteral feeling. Ann Surg 215, 503513.
Maier A, Pinter H, Tomaselli F, Sankin O, Gabor S, Ratzenhofer-Komenda B & Smolle-Juttner FM (2002) Retrosternal pedicled jejunum interposition: an alternative for reconstruction after total esophago-gastrectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22, 661665.
Mercer CD & Mungara A (1996) Enteral feeding in esophageal surgery. Nutrition 12, 200201.
Moore FA, Feliciano DV & Andrassy RJ (1992) Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. Ann Surg 216, 172.
Sand J, Luostarinen M & Matikainen M (1997) Enteral or parenteral feeding after total gastrectomy: prospective randomized pilot study. Eur J Surg 163, 761766.
Schilder JM, Hurteau JA, Look KY, Moore DH, Raff G, Stehmann FB & Sutton GP (1999) A prospective controlled trial of early postoperative oral intake following major abdominal gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 67, 235240.
Swank GM & Deitch EA (1996) Role of the gut in multiple organ failure: bacterial translocation and permeability changes. World J Surg 20, 411417.
Velez JP, Lince LF & Restrepo JI (1997) Early enteral nutrition in gastrointestinal surgery: a pilot study. Nutrition 13, 442445.
Weimann A, Bastian L, Grotz M, Heine J & Schlitt HJ (1999) Welche Bedeutung besitzt der Darm in der Ätiologie des Multiorganversagens. Aktuelle Ernährungs-Med 24, 2024.
Windsor AC, Klava A, Somers SS, Giullou PJ & Reynolds VV (1995) Manipulation of local and systemic host defence in the prevention of perioperative sepsis. Br J Surg 82(11), 14601467.
Yagi M, Hashimoto T, Nezuka H, Ito H, Tani T, Shimizu K & Miwa K (1999) Complications associated with enteral nutrition using catheter jejunostomy after esophagectomy. Surg Today 29, 214218.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 242 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 386 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.