Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-2657c Total loading time: 0.21 Render date: 2022-03-08T21:48:07.312Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
British Journal of Nutrition British Journal of Nutrition

Article contents

Effects of feed intake on composition of sheep rumen contents and their microbial population size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. A. Rodríguez ,
J. González ,
M. R. Alvir ,
R. Redondo  and
C. Cajarville
C. A. Rodríguez*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
J. González
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
M. R. Alvir
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
R. Redondo
Affiliation:
Servicio Interdepartamental de Investigación, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
C. Cajarville
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
*Corresponding Author: Dr C. A. Rodríguez, fax +34 91 5499763, email crodriguez@pan.etsia.upm.es
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present study was conducted to determine the effect of feed intake on the composition of the rumen contents of sheep and on their bacterial densities. Whole rumen contents were sampled after a period of continuous inter-rumen infusion of 15NH3 from four rumen-cannulated wethers successively fed on a hay–concentrate diet (2:1, / on a DM basis) at two rates of feed intake: 40 and 80 g D/g body weight0·75. Total weight and chemical composition of rumen contents, as well as the distribution by size and chemical composition of particles, were determined. The populations of bacteria associated with the liquid (liquid-associated bacteria, LAB) and solid (solid-associated bacteria, SAB) fractions of rumen digesta and the distribution of SAB according to feed particle size were also examined. The greater feed intake caused an increase in the mass of the rumen contents, while its chemical composition did not change, except for a higher content of organic matter (P=0·023). The distribution of feed particles by size was similar at both levels of intake. The concentrations of neutral- and acid-detergent fibre in feed particles decreased and those of total, dietary, and microbial N increased, both with a quadratic response (P=0·001), as particle size decreased. The proportion of LAB in the microbial biomass of rumen digesta reached only 8·0 %. This proportion and the density of LAB were unaffected by the level of feed intake, whereas an apparent reduction (10·4 %) occurred with the SAB biomass in whole rumen contents. A systematic, but not significant, reduction (mean value 11·9 %) in the level of microbial colonisation in the different particle fractions with the increase of feed intake was also observed.

Keywords

Rumen contentsChemical compositionFeed intakeMicrobial population size
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 97 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2003

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council (1992) Technical committee on responses to nutrients. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Report no. 9. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 62, 787–835, (Series B)Google Scholar
Aitchison, EM, Gill, M, Dhanoa, MS & Osbourn, DF (1986) The effect of digestibility and forage species on the removal of digesta from the rumen and the voluntary intake of hay by sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984) Official Methods of Analysis, 14th ed, Arlington, VA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Bae, DH, Welch, JG & Smith, AM (1979) Forage intake and rumination by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 49, 1292–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, GW, Bartley, EE & Meyer, RM (1975) Feed processing. 8. Estimating microbial protein in rumen fluid with precipitating agents or in incubated mixtures of uncooked grain plus urea or starch with differential centrifugation. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 1308–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benchaar, C, Bayourthe, C, Vernay, M & Moncoulon, R (1995) Composition chimique des bactéries libres ou adhérentes au contenu du rumen et du duodénum chez la vache (Chemical composition of bacteria free or attached to rumen or duodenum content in cows). Annales de Zootechnie 44, Suppl., 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, KJ, Stewart, CS, Dinsdale, D & Costerton, JW (1984) Electron microscopy of bacteria involved in the digestion of plant cell walls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, JW & Breckenridge, G (1982) Distribution and changes in urease (EC 3·5.1·5) activity in rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 231–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, WC, Matis, JH, Pond, KR, Lascano, CE & Telford, JP (1984) Dietary influences on flow rate and digestive capacity. In Herbivore Nutrition in the Subtropics and Tropics, pp. 269–293 [Gilchrist, FMC and Machie, RI, editors]. Johannesburg: The Science Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, T, King, ASD, Kelly, KE & Kelly, WJ (1988) Influence of particle size and surface area on in vitro rates of gas production, lipolysis of triacylglycerol and hydrogenation of linoleic acid by sheep rumen digesta or Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, DG & McAllan, AB (1980) Factors affecting microbial growth yields in the reticulo-rumen. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 205–226 [Ruckebusch, Y and Thivend, P, editors]. Lancaster: MTP Press Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hespell, RB & Bryant, MP (1979) Efficiency of rumen microbial growth: influence of some theoretical and experimental factors on Y ATP. Journal of Animal Science 49, 1640–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, PL, Südekum, K-H & Stangassinger, M (1997) Rumen contents and ruminal and faecal particle size distribution in steers fed a mixed diet at three amounts of intake. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legay-Carmier, F & Bauchart, D (1989) Distribution of bacteria in the rumen contents of dairy cows given a diet supplemented with soyabean oil. British Journal of Nutrition 61, 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C & Michalet-Doreau, B (1995) Variations in mass and enzyme activity of rumen micro-organisms: Effect of barley and buffer supplements. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 67, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C, Williams, AG & Michalet-Doreau, B (1994) Isolation and characteristics of the protozoal and bacterial fractions from bovine ruminal contents. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2962–2968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merry, RJ & McAllan, AB (1983) A comparison of the chemical composition of mixed bacteria harvested from the liquid and solids fractions of rumen digesta. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalet-Doreau, B & Ould-Bah, MY (1989) Estimation of the extent of bacterial contamination in bag residues and its influence on in sacco measurements of forage nitrogen degradation in the rumen. In Proceedings of the XVI International Grassland Congress, 4–11 October 1989, Nice, France, pp. 909–910 [AFPF, editor]. Versailles: Asociation Française pour la Production Fourragère.Google Scholar
Minson, DJ (1966) The apparent retention of food in the reticulo-rumen at two levels of feeding by means of an hourly feeding technique. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 765–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, ER (1988) Nutrición proteica de los rumiantes (Protein nutrition in ruminants). Zaragoza: Acribia SA.Google Scholar
Pond, KR, Ellis, WC & Akin, DE (1984) Ingestive mastication and fragmentation of forages. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1567–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, JB & Van Soest, PJ (1981) The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food, pp. 123–158 [James, WPT and Theander, O, editors]. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Robinson, PH, Tamminga, S & van Vuuren, AM (1987) Influence of declining level of feed intake and varying the proportion of starch in the concentrate on rumen ingesta quantity, composition and kinetics of ingesta turnover in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 17, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, CA, González, J, Alvir, MR & Repetto, JL (1999) Microbial nitrogen contamination of in sacco ruminal incubated feeds. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. Book of Abstracts of the VIIIth International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, pp. 68 [Lobley, GE, White, A and MacRae, JC, editors]. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, CA, González, J, Alvir, MR, Repetto, JL, Centeno, C & Lamrani, F (2000) Composition of bacteria harvested from the liquid and solid fractions of the rumen of sheep as influenced by intake level. British Journal of Nutrition 84, 369–376.Google Scholar
You have Access
17
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Effects of feed intake on composition of sheep rumen contents and their microbial population size
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Effects of feed intake on composition of sheep rumen contents and their microbial population size
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Effects of feed intake on composition of sheep rumen contents and their microbial population size
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *