Skip to main content

Growth performance, nutrient utilisation and carcass composition respond to dietary protein concentrations in broiler chickens but responses are modified by dietary lipid levels

  • Sonia Y. Liu (a1) (a2), Peter H. Selle (a1), David Raubenheimer (a2) (a3), Rob M. Gous (a4), Peter V. Chrystal (a5), David J. Cadogan (a6), Stephen J. Simpson (a3) and Aaron J. Cowieson (a1) (a7)...

A total of ten experimental diets with protein concentrations ranging from 154 to 400 g/kg and two lipid levels (46 and 85 g/kg) with identical energy densities were offered to 240 male Ross 308 broilers from 7 to 28 d post-hatch. Growth performance was monitored and nutrient utilisation (apparent metabolisable energy (AME), N-corrected AME (AMEn), AME daily intake, AME:gross energy ratios, N retention) was determined. The weight gain response of broiler chickens to dietary protein concentrations in diets containing high and low lipid levels was diverse, with the relevant quadratic regressions being significantly different (P<0·05). With low lipid levels, the predicted maximum weight gain of 1809 g/bird equated to 342 g/kg dietary protein, whereas, for high lipid levels the predicted maximum weight gain of 1694 g/bird equated to 281 g/kg dietary protein. AME was linearly correlated with dietary protein concentration but regressions in diets with different lipid content were not significantly different (P>0·05). AMEn was also linearly (P<0·0001) increased with dietary protein concentrations but regressions in diets with low and high lipid content were significantly different (P<0·03). Carcass protein content increased linearly with dietary protein content in diets containing high lipid concentrations (r 0·933, P<0·0001); by contrast, this relationship was quadratic (R 2=0·93, P<0·0001) in diets with low lipid levels. In conclusion, predictably, the effects of dietary protein concentrations on broiler performance were profound; however, the impact of dietary protein on performance in broiler chickens was modified by dietary lipid concentrations.

Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Dr S. Y. Liu, fax +61 2 9351 1693, email
Hide All
1. Jeyapalan, AS, Orellana, RA, Suryawan, A, et al. (2007) Glucose stimulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle of neonatal pigs through an AMPK- and mTOR-independent process. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 293, E595E603.
2. Liu, SY, Selle, PH, Raubenheimer, D, et al. (2016) An assessment of the influence of macronutrients on growth performance and nutrient utilisation in broiler chickens by nutritional geometry. Br J Nutr 116, 21292138.
3. Gous, RM (2010) An effective alternative to the metabolisable energy system. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, NSW, 1–3 February, pp. 36–43.
4. Emmans, GC (1994) Effective energy – a concept of energy-utilization applied across species. Br J Nutr 71, 801821.
5. Gous, RM, Wessels, JPH & Saunders, AJ (1973) The influence of dietary energy and protein on feed consumption and growth on broiler breeder pullets. Agroanimalia 5, 3138.
6. Riesenfeld, G, Sklan, D, Bar, A, et al. (1980) Glucose-absorption and starch digestion in the intestine of the chicken. J Nutr 110, 117121.
7. Mahasukhonthachat, K, Sopade, PA & Gidley, MJ (2010) Kinetics of starch digestion and functional properties of twin-screw extruded sorghum. J Cereal Sci 51, 392401.
8. Siriwan, P, Bryden, WL, Mollah, Y, et al. (1993) Measurement of endogenous amino-acid losses in poultry. Br Poult Sci 34, 939949.
9. Luque de Castro, MDL & Priego-Capote, F (2010) Soxhlet extraction: past and present panacea. J Chromatogr A 1217, 23832389.
10. Hill, FW & Anderson, DL (1958) Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. J Nutr 64, 587603.
11. Martinez, V, Jimenez, M, Gonalons, E, et al. (1995) Intraluminal lipids modulate avian gastrointestinal motility. Am J Physiol 269, R445R452.
12. Cowieson, AJ, Bedford, MR & Ravindran, V (2010) Interactions between xylanase and glucanase in maize-soy-based diets for broilers. Br Poult Sci 51, 246257.
13. Berhe, ET & Gous, RM (2008) Effect of dietary protein content on growth, uniformity and mortality of two commercial broiler strains. S Afr J Anim Sci 38, 293302.
14. Clark, FA, Gous, RM & Morris, TR (1982) Response of broiler-chickens to well-balanced protein mixtures. Br Poult Sci 23, 433446.
15. Jackson, S, Summers, JD & Leeson, S (1982) Effect of dietary-protein and energy on broiler carcass composition and efficiency of nutrient utilization. Poult Sci 61, 22242231.
16. Swennen, Q, Decuypere, E & Buyse, J (2007) Implications of dietary macronutrients for growth and metabolism in broiler chickens. World Poult Sci J 63, 541556.
17. Gous, RM, Emmans, GC, Broadbent, LA, et al. (1990) Nutritional effects on the growth and fatness of broilers. Br Poult Sci 31, 495505.
18. Campbell, RG & Dunkin, AC (1983) The effects of energy-intake and dietary-protein on nitrogen-retention, growth-performance, body-composition and some aspects of energy-metabolism of baby pigs. Br J Nutr 49, 221230.
19. Liu, SY & Selle, PH (2015) A consideration of starch and protein digestive dynamics in chicken-meat production. World Poult Sci J 71, 297310.
20. Truong, HH, Liu, SY & Selle, PH (2015) Phytase influences the inherently different starch digestive dynamics of wheat- and maize-based broiler diets. Proc Aust Poult Sci Symp 26, 126129.
21. Liu, SY, Truong, HH, Khoddami, A, et al. (2016) Comparative performance of broiler chickens offered ten equivalent diets based on three grain sorghum varieties as determined by response surface mixture design. Anim Feed Sci Technol 218, 7083.
22. Simpson, SJ & Raubenheimer, D (1995) The geometric analysis of feeding and nutrition – an users guide. J Insect Physiol 41, 545553.
23. Simpson, SJ & Raubenheimer, D (1993) A multilevel analysis of feeding-behavior – the geometry of nutritional decisions. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 342, 381402.
24. Raubenheimer, D & Simpson, SJ (2003) Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of dietary breadth. J Exp Biol 206, 16691681.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


" class="button small radius grey keywords">
acid-insoluble ash
  • apparent metabolisable energy
  • " class="button small radius grey keywords">
    apparent metabolisable energy
  • N-corrected AME
  • " class="button small radius grey keywords">
    N-corrected AME
  • effective energy
  • " class="button small radius grey keywords">
    effective energy
  • feed conversion ratio
  • " class="button small radius grey keywords">
    feed conversion ratio


    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 8
    Total number of PDF views: 119 *
    Loading metrics...

    Abstract views

    Total abstract views: 498 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th September 2017 - 21st August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.