Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Ceppa, Florencia Mancini, Andrea and Tuohy, Kieran 2018. Current evidence linking diet to gut microbiota and brain development and function. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, p. 1.
    ×
  • Get access
    Add to cart USD35.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian

Habitual dietary fibre intake influences gut microbiota response to an inulin-type fructan prebiotic: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, human intervention study

  • Genelle Healey (a1) (a2), Rinki Murphy (a3), Christine Butts (a2), Louise Brough (a1), Kevin Whelan (a4) and Jane Coad (a1)...
Abstract

Dysbiotic gut microbiota have been implicated in human disease. Diet-based therapeutic strategies have been used to manipulate the gut microbiota towards a more favourable profile. However, it has been demonstrated that large inter-individual variability exists in gut microbiota response to a dietary intervention. The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether habitually low dietary fibre (LDF) v. high dietary fibre (HDF) intakes influence gut microbiota response to an inulin-type fructan prebiotic. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, thirty-four healthy participants were classified as LDF or HDF consumers. Gut microbiota composition (16S rRNA bacterial gene sequencing) and SCFA concentrations were assessed following 3 weeks of daily prebiotic supplementation (Orafti® Synergy 1; 16 g/d) or placebo (Glucidex® 29 Premium; 16 g/d), as well as after 3 weeks of the alternative intervention, following a 3-week washout period. In the LDF group, the prebiotic intervention led to an increase in Bifidobacterium (P=0·001). In the HDF group, the prebiotic intervention led to an increase in Bifidobacterium (P<0·001) and Faecalibacterium (P=0·010) and decreases in Coprococcus (P=0·010), Dorea (P=0·043) and Ruminococcus (Lachnospiraceae family) (P=0·032). This study demonstrates that those with HDF intakes have a greater gut microbiota response and are therefore more likely to benefit from an inulin-type fructan prebiotic than those with LDF intakes. Future studies aiming to modulate the gut microbiota and improve host health, using an inulin-type fructan prebiotic, should take habitual dietary fibre intake into account.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © The Authors 2018 
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: G. Healey, email genellehealey@gmail.com
References
Hide All
1. Goodrich, JK, Davenport, ER, Beaumont, M, et al. (2016) Genetic determinants of the gut microbiome in UK twins. Cell Host Microbe 19, 731–743.
2. Yatsunenko, T, Rey, FE, Manary, MJ, et al. (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222–227.
3. Mueller, S, Saunier, K, Hanisch, C, et al. (2005) Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: a cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 1027–1033.
4. Dethlefsen, L, Huse, SM, Relman, DA, et al. (2008) The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol 6, e1000255.
5. Wu, GD, Chen, J, Hoffmann, C, et al. (2011) Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 334, 105–108.
6. David, LA, Maurice, CF, Carmody, RN, et al. (2013) Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–563.
7. Foerster, J, Maskarinec, G, Reichardt, N, et al. (2014) The influence of whole grain products and red meat on intestinal microbiota composition in normal weight adults: a randomized crossover intervention trial. PLOS ONE 9, e109606.
8. King, DE, Mainous, AG & Lambourne, CA (2012) Trends in dietary fiber intake in the United States, 1999–2008. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 642–648.
9. Ministry of Health (2015) Eating and Activity Guidelines for New Zealand Adults. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.
10. Gibson, GR, Hutkins, R, Sanders, ME, et al. (2017) The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14, 491–502.
11. Tap, J, Furet, JP, Bensaada, M, et al. (2015) Gut microbiota richness promotes its stability upon increased dietary fibre intake in healthy adults. Environ Microbiol 17, 4954–4964.
12. Tuohy, KM, Finlay, RK, Wynne, AG, et al. (2001) A human volunteer study on the prebiotic effects of HP-inulin – faecal bacteria enumerated using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Anaerobe 7, 113–118.
13. Tuohy, KM, Kolida, S, Lustenberger, AM, et al. (2001) The prebiotic effects of biscuits containing partially hydrolysed guar gum and fructo-oligosaccharides – a human volunteer study. Br J Nutr 86, 341–348.
14. de Preter, V, Vanhoutte, T, Huys, G, et al. (2008) Baseline microbiota activity and initial bifidobacteria counts influence responses to prebiotic dosing in healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27, 504–513.
15. Kolida, S, Meyer, D & Gibson, GR (2007) A double-blind placebo-controlled study to establish the bifidogenic dose of inulin in healthy humans. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 1189–1195.
16. Bouhnik, Y, Raskine, L, Champion, K, et al. (2007) Prolonged administration of low-dose inulin stimulates the growth of bifidobacteria in humans. Nutr Res 27, 187–193.
17. Eid, N, Osmanova, H, Natchez, C, et al. (2015) Impact of palm date consumption on microbiota growth and large intestinal health: a randomised, controlled, cross-over, human intervention study. Br J Nutr 114, 1226–1236.
18. Griffin, NW, Ahern, PP, Cheng, J, et al. (2017) Prior dietary practices and connections to a human gut microbial metacommunity alter responses to diet interventions. Cell Host Microbe 21, 84–96.
19. Healey, G, Brough, L, Butts, C, et al. (2016) Influence of habitual dietary fibre intake on the responsiveness of the gut microbiota to a prebiotic: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, single-centre study. BMJ Open 6, e012504.
20. Healey, G, Brough, L, Murphy, R, et al. (2016) Validity and reproducibility of a habitual dietary fibre intake short food frequency questionnaire. Nutrients 8, 3–9.
21. Ministry of Health & Department of Health and Ageing (2006) Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand- Executive Summary. Canberra, Australia: Ministry of Health & Department of Health and Ageing.
22. University of Otago & Ministry of Health (2011) A Focus on Nutrition: Key Findings of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey. Wellington, New Zealand: University of Otago & Ministry of Health.
23. Dunn, S, Datta, A, Kallis, S, et al. (2011) Validation of a food frequency questionnaire to measure intakes of inulin and oligofructose. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 402–408.
24. van Loo, J, Coussement, P, de Leenheer, L, et al. (1995) On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the western diet. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35, 525–552.
25. Moshfegh, AJ, Friday, JE, Goldman, JP, et al. (1999) Presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of Americans. J Nutr 129, 1407S–1411S.
26. Mills, A, Patel, A & Crawley, H (2002) Food Portion Sizes, 3rd ed. London: HMSO.
27. Flint, A, Raben, A, Blundell, JE, et al. (2000) Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies. Int J Obes 24, 38–48.
28. Caporaso, JG, Kuczynski, J, Stombaugh, J, et al. (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7, 335–336.
29. Masella, AP, Bartram, AK, Truszkowski, JM, et al. (2012) PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 31.
30. Edgar, RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461.
31. DeSantis, TZ, Hugenholtz, P, Larsen, N, et al. (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 5069–5072.
32. Wang, Q, Garrity, GM, Tiedje, JM, et al. (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 5261–5267.
33. Kok, RG, Waal, ADE, Schut, F, et al. (1996) Specific detection and analysis of a probiotic Bifidobacterium strain in infant feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 62, 68–3672.
34. Richardson, AJ, Calder, AG, Stewart, CS, et al. (1989) Simultaneous determination of volatile and non-volatile acidic fermentation products of anaerobes by capillary gas chromatography. Lett Appl Microbiol 9, 5–8.
35. Holscher, HD, Bauer, LL, Gourineni, V, et al. (2015) Agave inulin supplementation affects the fecal microbiota of healthy adults participating in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. J Nutr 145, 2025–2032.
36. Dewulf, EM, Cani, PD, Claus, SP, et al. (2013) Insight into the prebiotic concept: lessons from an exploratory, double blind intervention study with inulin-type fructans in obese women. Gut 62, 1112–1121.
37. Ramirez-Farias, C, Slezak, K, Fuller, Z, et al. (2009) Effect of inulin on the human gut microbiota: stimulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii . Br J Nutr 101, 541–550.
38. Costabile, A, Kolida, S, Klinder, A, et al. (2010) A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study to establish the bifidogenic effect of a very-long-chain inulin extracted from globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus) in healthy human subjects. Br J Nutr 104, 1007–1017.
39. Ramnani, P, Gaudier, E, Bingham, M, et al. (2010) Prebiotic effect of fruit and vegetable shots containing Jerusalem artichoke inulin: a human intervention study. Br J Nutr 104, 233–240.
40. Scott, KP, Martin, JC, Duncan, SH, et al. (2014) Prebiotic stimulation of human colonic butyrate-producing bacteria and bifidobacteria, in vitro . Microbiol Ecol 87, 30–40.
41. Jung, T-H, Jeon, W-M & Han, K-S (2015) In vitro effects of dietary inulin on human fecal microbiota and butyrate production. J Microbiol Biotechnol 25, 1555–1558.
42. Scheppach, W (1994) Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut 35, 1 Suppl., S35–S38.
43. Belenguer, A, Duncan, SH, Calder, AG, et al. (2006) Two routes of metabolic cross-feeding between Bifidobacterium adolescentis and butyrate-producing anaerobes from the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 3593–3599.
44. Brahma, S, Martínez, I, Walter, J, et al. (2017) Impact of dietary pattern of the fecal donor on in vitro fermentation properties of whole grains and brans. J Funct Foods 29, 281–289.
45. Henson, MA & Phalak, P (2017) Byproduct cross feeding and community stability in an in silico biofilm model of the gut microbiome. Processes 5, 13.
46. Levitt, M (1971) Volume and composition of human intestinal gas determined by means of an intestinal washout technic. N Engl J Med 284, 1394–1398.
47. Lin, HV, Frassetto, A, Kowalik, EJ, et al. (2012) Butyrate and propionate protect against diet-induced obesity and regulate gut hormones via free fatty acid receptor 3-independent mechanisms. PLOS ONE 7, e35240.
48. Sonnenburg, ED, Zheng, H, Joglekar, P, et al. (2010) Specificity of polysaccharide use in intestinal bacteroides species determines diet-induced microbiota alterations. Cell 141, 1241–1252.
49. Wilson, B & Whelan, K (2017) Prebiotic inulin-type fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides: definition, specificity, function, and application in gastrointestinal disorders. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32, 64–68.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Healey et al. supplementary material
Tables S1-S8

 Word (68 KB)
68 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 38
Total number of PDF views: 366 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2589 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th January 2018 - 19th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×