Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Health and dietary traits of organic food consumers: results from the NutriNet-Santé study

  • Julia Baudry (a1), Caroline Méjean (a1), Sandrine Péneau (a1), Pilar Galan (a1), Serge Hercberg (a1) (a2), Denis Lairon (a3) and Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot (a1)...
Abstract

The dietary and health traits of organic food (OF) consumers have not been comprehensively described. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with OF consumption. Data were collected from 54 283 participants from the NutriNet-Santé cohort using self-administered web-based questionnaires. Occasional organic food consumers and regular organic food consumers (ROFC) were compared with non-organic food consumers (NOFC) using logistical regression providing an OR and 95 % CI. Adherence to the French food-based guidelines and interactions between nutritional knowledge and OF consumption in adherence to dietary guidelines were investigated. Medical history was also assessed in relation to OF consumption. Compared with NOFC, ROFC were more likely to be vegetarian (OR 9·93; 95 % CI 7·42, 13·29 in women; OR 13·07; CI 7·00, 24·41 in men) and were less likely to be aware of nutritional guidelines regarding meat consumption (OR 0·37; CI 0·34, 0·40 in women; OR 0·41; CI 0·36, 0·47 in men). Compared with NOFC, ROFC had a lower risk of type II diabetes, hypertension and CVD; however, this effect was only significant for men. In contrast, organic consumers were more likely to report food allergies. Consuming OF appeared to affect the relationship between nutritional knowledge and adequate intake of meat/poultry/seafood/eggs and starchy food among both sexes. Our study provides new insights into the diet- and health-related behaviours of OF consumers in a large sample of participants residing in France. This should be taken into account in future studies investigating relationships between health and OF consumption.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Health and dietary traits of organic food consumers: results from the NutriNet-Santé study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Health and dietary traits of organic food consumers: results from the NutriNet-Santé study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Health and dietary traits of organic food consumers: results from the NutriNet-Santé study
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: J. Baudry, fax +33 1 48 38 8931, email j.baudry@uren.smbh.univ-paris13.fr
References
Hide All
1. Willer, H and Lernoud, J, (editors) (2015) The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2015. FiBL-IFOAM Report. Bonn: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick and IFOAM – Organics International.
2. Agence Bio CSA (2015) Baromètre de consommation et de perception des produits biologiques en France (Barometer of Consumption of Organic Products in France). Agence Bio CSA. http://www.agencebio.org/sites/default/files/upload/documents/4_Chiffres/BarometreConso/barometre_agence_bio_public.pdf (accessed May 2015).
3. Johansson, E, Hussain, A, Kuktaite, R, et al. (2014) Contribution of organically grown crops to human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11, 38703893.
4. Oates, L, Cohen, M & Braun, L (2012) Characteristics and consumption patterns of Australian organic consumers. J Sci Food Agric 92, 27822787.
5. Bravo, CP, Cordts, A, Schulze, B, et al. (2013) Assessing determinants of organic food consumption using data from the German National Nutrition Survey II. Food Qual Prefer 28, 6070.
6. Hughner, RS, McDonagh, P, Prothero, A, et al. (2007) Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. J Consum Behav 6, 94110.
7. Wier, M, O’Doherty Jensen, K, Andersen, LM, et al. (2008) The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark compared. Food Policy 33, 406421.
8. Wunderlich, SM, Feldman, C, Kane, S, et al. (2008) Nutritional quality of organic, conventional, and seasonally grown broccoli using vitamin C as a marker. Int J Food Sci Nutr 59, 3445.
9. Carbonaro, M, Mattera, M, Nicoli, S, et al. (2002 ) Modulation of antioxidant compounds in organic vs conventional fruit (peach, Prunus persica L., and pear, Pyrus communis L.). J Agric Food Chem 50, 54585462.
10. Lairon, D (2010) Nutritional quality and safety of organic food. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30, 3341.
11. Barański, M, Średnicka-Tober, D, Volakakis, N, et al. (2014) Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Br J Nutr, 112, 794811.
12. Dangour, AD, Dodhia, SK, Hayter, A, et al. (2009) Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 680685.
13. Finamore, A, Britti, MS, Roselli, M, et al. (2004) Novel approach for food safety evaluation. Results of a pilot experiment to evaluate organic and conventional foods. J Agric Food Chem 52, 74257431.
14. Chhabra, R, Kolli, S & Bauer, JH (2013) Organically grown food provides health benefits to Drosophila melanogaster . PLOS ONE 8, e52988.
15. Huber, M, Rembiałkowska, E, Średnicka, D, et al. (2011) Organic food and impact on human health: assessing the status quo and prospects of research. NJAS 58, 103109.
16. Dangour, AD, Lock, K, Hayter, A, et al. (2010) Nutrition-related health effects of organic foods: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 203210.
17. Lairon, D & Huber, M (2014) Food quality and possible positive health effects of organic products. In Organic Farming Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures, pp. 295312 [S Bellon and S Penvern, editors]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
18. Smith-Spangler, C, Brandeau, ML, Hunter, GE, et al. (2012) Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives? A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 157, 348366.
19. Kummeling, I, Thijs, C, Huber, M, et al. (2008) Consumption of organic foods and risk of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life in the Netherlands. Br J Nutr 99, 598605.
20. Hassan, D, Monier-Dilhan, S, Nichele, V, et al. (2009) Organic food consumption patterns in France. J Agric Food Ind Organ 7, 123.
21. Dimitri, C & Dettmann, RL (2012) Organic food consumers: what do we really know about them? Br Food J 114, 11571183.
22. Torjusen, H, Brantsæter, AL, Haugen, M, et al. (2010) Characteristics associated with organic food consumption during pregnancy; data from a large cohort of pregnant women in Norway. BMC Public Health 10, 775.
23. Petersen, SB, Rasmussen, MA, Strøm, M, et al. (2013) Sociodemographic characteristics and food habits of organic consumers – a study from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Public Health Nutr. 16, 18101819.
24. Eisinger-Watzl, M, Wittig, F, Heuer, T, et al. (2015) Customers purchasing organic food – do they live healthier? Results of the German National Nutrition Survey II. Eur J Nutr Food Saf 5, 5971.
25. Kesse-Guyot, E, Péneau, S, Méjean, C, et al. (2013) Profiles of organic food consumers in a large sample of French adults: results from the Nutrinet-Santé cohort study. PLOS ONE 8, e76998.
26. Hercberg, S, Castetbon, K, Czernichow, S, et al. (2010) The Nutrinet-Santé study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 10, 242.
27. Touvier, M, Méjean, C, Kesse-Guyot, E, et al. (2010) Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol 25, 287296.
28. Hagströmer, M, Oja, P & Sjöström, M (2006) The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr 9, 755762.
29. Le Moullec, N, Deheeger, M, Preziosi, P, et al. (1996) Validation du manuel-photos utilisé pour l’enquête alimentaire de l’étude SU.VI.MAX (Validation of the photo manual used for the collection of dietary data in the SU.VI.MAX study). Cah Nutr Diét 31, 158164.
30. Etude Nutrinet-Santé (2013) Table de composition des aliments de l’étude Nutrinet-Santé (Nutrinet-Santé Study Food Composition Database). Paris: Economica.
31. Lassale, C, Castetbon, K, Laporte, F, et al. (2015) Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers. Br J Nutr 113, 953962.
32. Hercberg, S, Chat-Yung, S & Chauliac, M (2008) The French National Nutrition and Health Program: 2001–2006–2010. Int J Public Health 53, 6877.
33. Black, AE (2000) Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 11191130.
34. Schofield, WN (1985) Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 39, 541.
35. Magnusson, MK, Arvola, A, Hursti, U-KK, et al. (2003) Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite 40, 109117.
36. Michaelidou, N & Hassan, LM (2008) The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. Int J Consum Stud 32, 163170.
37. Schifferstein, HNJ & Oude Ophuis, PAM (1998) Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Qual Prefer 9, 119133.
38. Pearson, D, Henryks, J & Jones, H (2011) Organic food: what we know (and do not know) about consumers. Renew Agric Food Syst 26, 171177.
39. Dickson-Spillmann, M, Siegrist, M & Keller, C (2011) Attitudes toward chemicals are associated with preference for natural food. Food Qual Prefer 22, 149156.
40. Jerschow, E, McGinn, AP, de Vos, G, et al. (2012) Dichlorophenol-containing pesticides and allergies: results from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2006. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 109, 420425.
41. Alfvén, T, Braun-Fahrländer, C, Brunekreef, B, et al. (2006) Allergic diseases and atopic sensitization in children related to farming and anthroposophic lifestyle – the PARSIFAL study. Allergy 61, 414421.
42. Padel, S & Foster, C (2005) Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour. Br Food J 107, 606625.
43. Patterson, RE, Neuhouser, ML, Hedderson, MM, et al. (2003) Changes in diet, physical activity, and supplement use among adults diagnosed with cancer. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 323328.
44. Baghurst, KI, Baghurst, PA & Record, SJ (1992) Public perceptions of the role of dietary and other environmental factors in cancer causation or prevention. J Epidemiol Community Health 46, 120126.
45. Alavanja, MCR, Ross, MK & Bonner, MR (2013) Increased cancer burden among pesticide applicators and others due to pesticide exposure. CA Cancer J Clin 63, 120142.
46. Alavanja, MCR & Bonner, MR (2012) Occupational pesticide exposures and cancer risk: a review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 15, 238263.
47. Lebailly, P, Niez, E & Baldi, I (2007) Données épidémiologiques sur le lien entre cancers et pesticides (Epidemiological data on the relationship between cancer and pesticides). Oncologie 9, 361369.
48. Nasterlack, M (2007) Pesticides and childhood cancer: an update. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210, 645657.
49. Bradbury, KE, Balkwill, A, Spencer, EA, et al. (2014) Organic food consumption and the incidence of cancer in a large prospective study of women in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer 110, 23212326.
50. Spronk, I, Kullen, C, Burdon, C, et al. (2014) Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. Br J Nutr 111, 17131726.
51. Shiferaw, B, Verrill, L, Booth, H, et al. (2012) Sex-based differences in food consumption: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) Population Survey, 2006–2007. Clin Infect Dis 54, S453S457.
52. Goetzke, B, Nitzko, S & Spiller, A (2014) Consumption of organic and functional food. A matter of well-being and health? Appetite 77, 94103.
53. Andreeva, VA, Salanave, B, Castetbon, K, et al. (2015) Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health 69, 893898.
54. INSEE (Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques) (2009) French national census data. http://www.insee.fr/fr/ppp/bases-de-donnees/recensement/populations-legales/default.asp?annee=2009 (accessed June 2013).
55. INPES (2008) Baromètre santé nutrition. Perceptions, connaissances et attitudes en matière d’alimentation (Health and Nutrition Barometer. Perceptions, knowledge and attitudes in terms of nutrition). http://www.inpes.sante.fr/Barometres/barometre-sante-nutrition-2008/pdf/perceptions-connaissances.pdf (accessed July 2015).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Baudry supplementary material
Table S1-S3

 Word (35 KB)
35 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed