Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-dxj8b Total loading time: 1.541 Render date: 2023-01-30T19:35:26.900Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with higher DNA damage in healthy adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2020

Sareh Edalati
Affiliation:
Student Research Committee, Department of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran1981619573, Iran
Farzaneh Bagherzadeh
Affiliation:
Student Research Committee, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz5165665931, Iran
Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
Affiliation:
Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz5165665931, Iran
Mehrangiz Ebrahimi-Mamaghani*
Affiliation:
Social Determinant of Health Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz5165665931, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: Mehrangiz Ebrahimi-Mamaghani, fax +98 411 334 0634, email ebrahimimamagani@tbzmed.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ultra-processed food is one of the main contributors to energy supply and consumption in food systems worldwide, and evidence of their detrimental health outcomes in humans is emerging. This study aimed to assess ultra-processed food intake and its association with urinary levels of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a biomarker of DNA oxidative damage, in 139 healthy adolescents in Karaj City in Iran. Usual dietary intake was measured using a 168-item validated FFQ. The daily intake of ultra-processed food consumption was determined through the classification of NOVA, and general linear models were used to compare the urinary levels of 8-OHdG/creatinine (ng/mg creatinine) within tertiles of ultra-processed food intake. Adolescents in the higher tertile of ultra-processed food consumption had a significantly higher mean level of urinary 8-OHdG/creatinine in comparison with the lower tertiles in the crude model (Pfor trend: 0·003) and after adjustment for confounding variables, including total energy intake, sex, age, BMI for age Z-score, obesity and physical activity (Pfor trend: 0·004). This association was still significant after adjusting for dietary intake of whole grains, nuts, legumes, the ratio of MUFA:SFA (g/d) and Mediterranean dietary score (Pfor trend: 0·002). More studies are needed to explore the determinants of ultra-processed food supply, demand, consumption and health effects; such studies should be applied to develop evidence-informed policies and regulatory mechanisms to improve children’s and adolescents’ food environment policymaking and legislation with special attention to ultra-processed food.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Non-communicable diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. They impose a remarkable economic burden, estimated at 7 trillion dollars during 2011–2025 in low- and middle-income countries(Reference Bloom, Chisholm and Jané-Llopis1). Oxidative stress, an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defence, can occur at an early age and lead to the development of several non-communicable diseases including cancer(Reference Kryston, Georgiev and Pissis2,Reference Wells, McCallum and Chen3) .

Children and adolescents seem to be more susceptible to exposure to accumulated reactive oxygen species and carcinogenic factors during development stages(Reference Lewis and Tollefsbol4Reference Tain and Hsu7). Moreover, unhealthy risk factors in children and adolescents could contribute to the long-term influence on non-communicable diseases in adult life based on the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis(Reference Barouki, Gluckman and Grandjean8). Therefore, knowing dietary modifiable factors affecting oxidative damage is of great importance(Reference Salvini, Sera and Caruso9Reference Anderson, Milne and Sandler12).

8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a biomarker of oxidative-generated DNA damage, has been widely used as a sensitive indicator of oxidative stress and carcinogenesis(Reference Wu, Chiou and Chang13). Several studies have reported higher levels of 8-OHdG in several non-communicable diseases including cancer(Reference Valavanidis, Vlachogianni and Fiotakis14Reference Qing, Shi and Lv18). Urinary 8-OHdG is a stable biomarker of oxidative stress, and the production of artifacts during its sampling is rare(Reference Møller and Loft19Reference Cooke, Olinski and Loft21). Furthermore, its measurement is non-invasive, which makes it a suitable biomarker for assessing overall DNA oxidative damage(Reference Lam, Mistry and Marczylo22), especially in the population of vulnerable children.

Ultra-processed food has become one of the main sources of food consumed in modern food systems in different countries(Reference Monteiro, Moubarac and Cannon23Reference Silva Meneguelli, Viana Hinkelmann and Hermsdorff26). Recently, several studies have revealed that consumption of ultra-processed food is associated with adverse health outcomes, including cancer, CVD and obesity(Reference Rico-Campà, Martínez-González and Alvarez-Alvarez27Reference Marti34). Fiolet et al. assessed dietary intake of 104 980 adults enrolled in the prospective French NutriNet-Santé cohort study and found that a 10 % increase in dietary intake of ultra-processed food was associated with a significant 12 % increase in overall cancer risk(Reference Fiolet, Srour and Sellem29,Reference Gourd35) . Another report from the recent study by Srour et al.(Reference Srour, Fezeu and Kesse-Guyot36) showed that there was a higher risk of CVD associated with the consumption of ultra-processed food. Using secondary data analyses of the Seguimiento University of Navarra prospective cohort study in Spain, Rico-Campà et al.(Reference Rico-Campà, Martínez-González and Alvarez-Alvarez27) reported that each additional serving of ultra-processed food increased all-cause mortality by 18 %.

To our knowledge, the association between oxidative stress and dietary ultra-processed food has not been investigated; however, a limited number of studies have reported that advanced glycation end products in ultra-processed food could adversely affect oxidative stress in animal or in vitro cell studies(Reference Vlassara and Striker37,Reference Davis, Prasad and Vijayagopal38) . Heterocyclic amine intakes were also associated with high levels of DNA damage levels in adults(Reference de Carvalho, Carioca and Fisberg39).

Until now, studies linking 8-OHdG and dietary factors mostly focused on antioxidant nutrients and the Mediterranean diet and its food components, in which some studies showed protective effects of antioxidant components(Reference Salvini, Sera and Caruso9,Reference de Carvalho, Carioca and Fisberg39,Reference Del Bo, Marino and Martini40) while others did not(Reference Giovannelli, Saieva and Masala41,Reference Kim, Yang and Yang42) . For example, Aline de Carvalho et al. found that a lower intake of fruit was associated with higher DNA damage levels in 146 Brazilian adults(Reference de Carvalho, Carioca and Fisberg39). Kim et al.(Reference Kim, Yang and Yang42), however, did not find any association between Mediterranean diet and 8-OHdG in 976 Korean adults.

Examining the association between DNA oxidative damage and ultra-processed food intake gained from a regular diet in different populations can unravel the mechanisms underlying the detrimental effects of ultra-processed food intakes on health outcomes. The present study, for the first time, aimed to assess the association between ultra-processed food intake and DNA oxidative damage in healthy adolescents in Iran.

Methods

Study population

Totally, 139 students aged 13–19 years were recruited through a multi-stage random cluster sampling process from ten public high schools in five different districts in Karaj City. For detection of the weakest correlation (r 0·3) between ultra-processed food intake and urinary considerations of 8-OHdG, with α error = 0·05 and β error = 0·1, the total sample size required was 114. However, for improving the precision of the study, the sample size was increased(Reference Norman and Streiner43).

The involvement of oxidative stress in chronic disease is well documented in several studies and having a chronic disease may affect dietary modifications(Reference Kryston, Georgiev and Pissis2). As this factor may confound the association between ultra-processed food intake and oxidative DNA damage, we controlled for these confounding variables as exclusion criteria and excluded children with known metabolic diseases. The exclusion criteria were as follows: history of any chronic diseases which may induce oxidative stress affect and alter dietary intakes or including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypo-and hyperthyroidism, kidney disease, hepatic disorders and being on a restrictive diet. All eligible participants signed written informed consent at the baseline.

Dietary intake assessment

Usual adolescent dietary intake over the past year was evaluated using a 168-item validated FFQ specifically tailored to the Iranian population(Reference Asghari, Rezazadeh and Hosseini-Esfahani44). Study participants were asked to report how often, on average, she or he had consumed every food item on a daily, weekly, monthly or yearly basis over the previous year, followed by a question about the amount of food consumed each time in standard or household units. Portion sizes of consumed food were converted to grams by using household measures(Reference Ghafarpour, Houshiar-Rad and Kianfar45). Then, the consumed amount for every food item was calculated by multiplying the frequency/d and grams of consumption. We estimated the daily dietary intake of ultra-processed food based on NOVA food group classification(Reference Moubarac, Parra and Cannon46) by summing the daily intake of thirty-seven food and beverage items included in FFQ that classified as ultra-processed food and categorised as seven food groups and expressed as intake in g/d (online Supplementary file 1). To understand the contribution of each food group to total ultra-processed food intake, the mean daily intake from each seven subgroups of ultra-processed food divided by the daily intake of total ultra-processed food multiplied by 100. The energy intake was analysed using the US Department of Agriculture’s food composition tables(47). To define over and under-reporting, we used the method suggested by Banna et al.(Reference Banna, McCrory and Fialkowski48). Therefore, boys with energy intake out of 3347 kJ/d (800 kcal/d) or 16 736 kJ/d (4000 kcal/d) and girls with energy intake out of 2092 kJ/d (500 kcal/d) or 14 664 kJ/d (3500 kcal/d) were excluded (six people).

The method described by Trichopoulou et al.(Reference Trichopoulou, Costacou and Bamia49) has been used to measure adherence to the Mediterranean dietary score (MDS). In this method, food is divided into nine food groups including fruits, fish, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, the ratio of grams of MUFA:SFA, meats (red meat, poultry and processed meat) and dairy products. MDS is represented by a scale where a value of 1 was assigned to the consumption of food groups considered beneficial to health at or above the median (vegetables, legumes, fruits and nuts, cereals, fish and ratio of MUFA:SFA) and below the median for food groups presumed to be detrimental to health (meats and dairy products). The MDS was calculated for each participant by summing of scores from the nine components for a total MDS within a range of zero (minimal adherence) to nine (maximal adherence)(Reference Trichopoulou, Costacou and Bamia49,Reference Chan, Chan and Woo50) . A higher score represented more adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

Measurement of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine

Spot morning urine samples were taken and centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min. The clear supernatant was used for measuring 8-OHdG concentration. The concentration of 8-OHdG was measured using ELISA using a commercially available standard kit and based on the manufacturer’s instructions (Cusabio; Catalog no. CSB-E10140h). 8-OHdG (ng/ml) levels were then adjusted for urinary creatinine (mg/ml) levels, measured by a kinetic colorimetric method, and expressed as 8-OHdG/creatinine (ng/mg creatinine) before statistical analysis.

Demographic, anthropometric and physical activity assessment

Demographic variables including information on age, sex, exposure to smoking and medical history were obtained from a self-administrated questionnaire. Height was measured using a stadiometer (Seca, model 206) fixed to the wall, without shoes and headdress using the Frankfort technique. Weight was measured using a digital scale to the nearest 0·1 kg (Seca 707), while the person was in light clothing and barefoot. BMI was calculated by dividing weight by height squared (kg/m2). BMI for age Z-score was calculated according to the 2007 WHO standard using Anthro Plus software version 1.0.4 by the WHO-2007 growth reference standard. BMI for age (Z-score > +1) described being obese or overweight(51).

Physical activity was measured using a self-reported questionnaire expressed as an equivalent metabolic h/d (MET-h/d)(Reference Aadahl and Jørgensen52). The physical activity questionnaire based on metabolic equivalent (MET) data, including nine levels of activity from sleep and rest (MET 0·9) to vigorous activity (more than six MET), was used to evaluate the students’ level of physical activity. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire have been previously confirmed in Iran(Reference Aadahl and Jørgensen52,Reference Ziaee, Kelishadi and Ardalan53) .

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS version 16 software (SPSS Inc.). The distribution of variables in all and across the tertiles of ultra-processed food was assessed using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Demographic characteristics and dietary intakes in all participants and within different tertiles of ultra-processed food were reported as mean values and standard deviations for normally distributed variables and geometric means and 95 % CI for ones with skewed distribution. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. To compare baseline characteristics and dietary intake within tertiles of ultra-processed food, we used χ 2 tests for categorical variables (sex, obesity or overweight, exposure to smoking) and general linear models after adjustment for total energy intake.

General linear models were also used to compare the geometric mean concentration of urinary 8-OHdG/creatinine within tertiles ultra-processed food intake in the uni- and multivariate models. The inclusion of variables as confounding factors was based on previous literature and known or suspected variables that affect 8-OHdG, such as the MDS and its food components(Reference Del Bo, Marino and Martini40). Model 1 was adjusted for total energy intake (kcal/d), sex (female, male), age (years), BMI for age Z-score, obesity and physical activity (MET). In model 2, additional adjustments for whole grains (g/d), nuts (g/d), legumes and the ratio of MUFA:SFA (g/d) were carried out. Model 3 adjusted for the same covariates in model 2 plus MDS. The P for trend was calculated from generalised linear models in different models. All tests were two-sided, and P < 0·05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The characteristics and dietary intakes of the study participants in all and across tertiles categories of ultra-processed food intake are presented in Table 1. Boys significantly showed a higher intake of dietary ultra-processed food intake than girls. No significant difference was observed in the percentage of students who exposed to secondary smoke within tertiles of ultra-processed food intake. Individuals in the highest tertile of ultra-processed food consumption had significantly lower daily intakes of whole grains (P < 0·05), higher daily intakes of nuts (P < 0·05), total energy intake and ratio of MUFA:SFA (P < 0·001). Total MDS and daily intake of vegetables, fruits, fish, legumes, dairy products, poultry, meat and Na did not significantly differ across the tertiles of ultra-processed food intake. The prevalence of overweight/obesity was greater in the highest tertile compared with the lowest one, although the difference was not statistically significant.

Table 1. Participant characteristics and dietary intakes in total population and according to tertiles (T) of ultra-processed food intake in adolescents in the present study

(Mean values and standard deviations; geometric mean values and 95 % confidence intervals; numbers and percentages)

MET, metabolic equivalents; UPF, ultra-processed food; MDS, Mediterranean dietary score.

* P values based on χ 2 tests for categorical variables (sex, obesity or overweight, exposure to smoking), and P for trend-for trend for age, MET and dietary intakes using general linear model adjusted for total energy intake.

To convert energy values from kcal to kJ, multiply by 4·184.

Geometric mean and 95 % CI were calculated since data were not normally distributed.

The main two food group contributors to ultra-processed food intake are shown in Table 2, which were non-dairy beverages (coffee, cola and lemon juice), following cookies and cakes group (cookies, biscuits, pastries (creamy and non-creamy), cake, pancake, doughnut, industrial bread, toasted bread, noodles and pasta). The relation between ultra-processed food intake and geometric mean urinary 8-OHdG damage is shown in Table 3. As dietary ultra-processed food intake rose from the lowest to the highest tertile, the geometric mean concentration of urinary 8-OHdG creatinine concentrations significantly increased from 2·6 to 4·4 in the crude model (P for trend: 0·003). The positive association between dietary ultra-processed food intake and 8-OHdG concentration was significant in model 1 (adjusted for total energy intake (kcal/d), sex (female, male), age (years), BMI for age Z-score, obesity and physical activity (MET)) (P for trend: 0·004). This relationship was stronger and still significant in model 2 (additionally adjusted for dietary intake of whole grains, nuts, legumes and ratio of MUFA:SFA (g/d)) and model 3 (additionally adjusted for MDS) (P for trend: 0·002).

Table 2. Main contribution of ultra-processed food intake in adolescents in the present study

(Percentages)

Table 3. Urinary concentration of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG8)/creatinine according to tertiles of ultra-processed food group consumption in adolescents in the present study

(Geometric mean (GM) values and 95 % confidence intervals)

* GM and 95 % CI were calculated on the basis of log (ln)-transformed of urinary 8-OHdG/creatinine (ng/mg creatinine).

Model 1 adjusted for total energy intake (kcal/d), sex (female, male), age (years), BMI for age Z-score, obesity and physical activity (MET).

Model 2 adjusted for variables in model 1 plus whole grains (g/d), nuts (g/d), legumes (g/d) and the ratio of MUFA:SFA (g/d).

§ Model 3 adjusted for variables in model 2 plus Mediterranean dietary score.

P value for linear trend over tertiles of ultra-processed food intake.

Discussion

The present study is the first one which showed that higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with a higher urinary biomarker of DNA oxidative damage in healthy adolescents. This association was still significant after taking into consideration factors like sex, obesity, BMI for age Z-scores, physical activity, MDS and food components that are known or suspected to affect 8-OHdG(Reference Del Bo, Marino and Martini40).

Studies investigating the association between DNA damage and ultra-processed food intake are not common. However, a study by de Carvalho et al.(Reference de Carvalho, Carioca and Fisberg39) has shown that dietary intake of heterocyclic amine, a contaminant, seems to be high in ultra-processed food(Reference Fiolet, Srour and Sellem29); this has been associated with increased DNA damage in adults. There has been also some evidence showing that advanced glycation end products have detrimental effects on oxidative stress in animal or in vitro studies(Reference Vlassara and Striker37,Reference Davis, Prasad and Vijayagopal38) .

The mechanisms behind the effect of ultra-processed food on oxidative damage are not clear. Several studies have shown that different ultra-processed food in the food market, such as cereals including cookies and cakes(Reference Croft, Tong and Fuentes54,Reference Shakeri, Shakeri and Ghasemi55) , biscuits(Reference Razia, Bertrand and Klaus56,Reference Rufian-Henares, Arribas-Lorenzo and Morales57) , industrial bread(Reference Eslamizad, Kobarfard and Tsitsimpikou58Reference Boyacı Gündüz and Cengiz60), potato chips(Reference Rufian-Henares, Arribas-Lorenzo and Morales57,Reference Shamla and Nisha61,Reference Powers, Mottram and Curtis62) and coffee(Reference Guenther, Anklam and Wenzl63), contain a high concentration of acrylamide(Reference Seal, De Mul and Eisenbrand64). Based on laboratory data, this chemical has been shown to have a carcinogenic effect(Reference Guenther, Anklam and Wenzl63,Reference Normandin, Bouchard and Ayotte65Reference Besaratinia and Pfeifer69) , although the epidemiological evidence has not been consistent in this regard(Reference Riboldi, Vinhas and Moreira70). Acrylamide has been declared a human health concern by the European Food Safety Authority Panel on contaminants in the food chain as well as join the FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives(Reference Marcason71).

Moreover, ultra-processed foods may contain substantial acellular nutrients, emulsifiers and non-energetic artificial sweeteners that could adversely affect the gut microbiota and induce oxidative stress and inflammation based on laboratory evidence(Reference Zinöcker and Lindseth72Reference Shi74). Dietary advanced glycation end products produced during the heating and processing of food products might contribute to risk factors associated with chronic diseases, such as inflammation and oxidative stress too(Reference Clarke, Dordevic and Tan75,Reference Gill, Kumar and Singh76) . Some ultra-processed foods are high in fructose, and the detrimental effects of fructose-rich diet have been noticed on mitochondrial DNA damage in the liver and in the case of metabolic diseases as shown in animal studies(Reference Cioffi, Senese and Lasala77). A study by Jones et al.(Reference Jones, Alderete and Kim78) showed that the high dietary fructose intake was associated with a lower abundance of the beneficial microbe Eubacterium and Streptococcus in healthy adolescents.

Food processing led to the production of Maillard reaction products, which have been associated with DNA oxidative damage(Reference Yen, Liao and Wu79) and unhealthy gut microflora(Reference Seiquer, Rubio and Peinado80) in cell and animal studies. The high glycaemic index of ultra-processed foods(Reference Fardet81,Reference Bahado-Singh, Wheatley and Ahmad82) may also affect oxidative stress, as the positive relationship between high dietary glycaemic index and oxidative stress has been reported. The oxidative potential of high dietary glycaemic index, simple carbohydrates and sugar to DNA oxidative damage sugar has been documented(Reference Giovannelli, Saieva and Masala41).

In the present study, participants in the higher tertiles of ultra-processed food consumption have been seen to be more obese or overweight; however, this difference is NS. Our results are in line with the study of Enes et al. who found no association between ultra-processed food intake and obesity of 200 adolescents aged 10–18 years in Brazil(Reference Enes, Camargo and Justino83). However, a recent systematic review reported a direct association between some ultra-processed food groups and body fat in children and adolescents(Reference Costa, Del-Ponte and Assunção31). In the present study, this null association might be because the participants in the higher tertiles of ultra-processed food intake were those who had higher intakes of vegetables, nuts and total MDS, too. The Mediterranean diet is high in phytochemicals with anti-obesity effects(Reference Eslami, Khoshgoo and Shidfar84,Reference Mendez, Popkin and Jakszyn85) . It may attenuate the obesity potential effects of ultra-processed food intake with high energetic intake and may affect the null relationship between ultra-processed food intake and obesity. The low sample size might be a factor for this null association too.

Previous studies have shown detrimental effects of ultra-processed food consumption on human health and the environment(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Moubarac30), highlighting the need for future research and policy efforts to attenuate it. The positive relationship between high intake of ultra-processed food and DNA oxidative damage in adolescents in the present study adds to earlier research. The detrimental effects of ultra-processed food for health and environment should provide a wakeup call for legislators, food and nutrition policymakers, food scientists, academics, civil society and food activists to improve and to reform food environment policy-making and ultra-processed food regulations.

As dietary exposure to ultra-processed food and beverages is high in children and adolescents, they might be more prone to the detrimental effects of acrylamide and other processing ingredients(66,Reference Brisson, Ayotte and Normandin8688) . Therefore, the development of a food safety monitoring and guidance system to define the content of acrylamide and other processing ingredients of industrial food mainly consumed by children and adolescents and to investigate the technological methods to reduce them while maintaining sensory quality in the industry(Reference Anese, Suman and Nicoli89) is highly recommended in Iran as well as other countries.

More research is needed to develop ground-breaking innovative methods and patents to reformulate and substitute ultra-processed food with healthier and safer ingredients(Reference Scrinis and Monteiro90). Restricting ultra-processed food advertising and marketing to children and adolescents is of great importance(Reference Allemandi, Castronuovo and Tiscornia91,Reference Mallarino, Gómez and González-Zapata92) . As a result of the lack of legislation or weak implementation of policies regarding the healthy food supply in school cafeterias, higher consumption of ultra-processed food in adolescents in different countries has been reported(Reference Noll, de Abreu and Baracat93). Although all strategies and policies supposed to decrease ultra-processed food consumption might not be achieved without improving the good governance components of health policies(Reference Siddiqi, Masud and Nishtar94,Reference Vandevijvere, Dominick and Devi95) regarding the food environment.

The low energy cost of ultra-processed foods has been shown to be one of its determinants in its consumption(Reference Gupta, Hawk and Aggarwal96). Keeping in mind the social determinants of health, developing agent-based policies and educational approaches to decrease ultra-processed food consumption might be important, but surely not enough(Reference McGill, Anwar and Orton97,Reference Neff, Palmer and McKenzie98) . Therefore, future research using mixed-method and whole-food system approaches(Reference Branca, Lartey and Oenema99) should be seriously recommended in order to know the broad behavioural, social and political-economic factors associated with the high intake of ultra-processed food that should be applied to develop policies and regulatory mechanisms to decrease ultra-processed food consumption, especially in children and adolescents.

The present study is an attempt to control other covariates that seem to affect 8-OHdG, such as physical activity. In a recent meta-analysis study done by Tryfidou et al.(Reference Tryfidou, McClean and Nikolaidis100), it was found that there was a substantial increase in DNA damage immediately following acute aerobic exercise, which remained between 2 h and 1 d, but not within 5–28 d post-exercise phase. In the present study, the participants were not athletes, and they did not do acute aerobic exercise before sampling.

Several limitations need to be considered when interpreting the results of the present study. First, we measured urinary 8-OHdG with the ELISA method. The ELISA technique has been widely used to measure urinary 8-OHdG in several previous studies and has shown to be correlated with measurements based on the HPLC method(Reference Curwin, Hein and Barr101,Reference Rossner and Sram102) . However, there are some concerns that ELISA frequently overestimates the urinary concentrations of 8-OHdG in comparison with chromatography-based methods(Reference Song, Li and Ootsuyama103Reference Guo, Li and Wang105). Therefore, further studies are needed to assess the link between ultra-processed food and DNA oxidative damage using HPLC.

Another limitation was the relatively small sample size as the consumption has been classified into three categories, which can reduce the power of analysis. Moreover, this study was cross-sectional and no conclusion about causality can be drawn. DNA damage may also be affected by other environmental factors such as outdoor or indoor air pollution and therefore needs to be addressed in future studies(Reference Kelishadi, Mirghaffari and Poursafa106,Reference He, Cui and Xia107) . Furthermore, although the FFQ used in the present study was developed and validated for the Iranian population, developing specified FFQ for assessing ultra-processed food consumption(Reference Fangupo, Haszard and Leong108) may be needed for more accurate measurement in future studies in adolescents.

In conclusion, the present study showed that higher ultra-processed food intake was associated with higher DNA oxidative damage in healthy adolescents. Future research is needed to confirm these results.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate participated students and Karaj public schools to support the present study.

The study was approved and financed by the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.

S. E. was involved in formulating the research question, data analysis, data interpretation, writing and finalising of the manuscript. F. B. was involved in data collection and data entry process. M. E.-M. and M. A. J. supervised the project. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material referred to in this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520001981

References

Bloom, DE, Chisholm, D, Jané-Llopis, E, et al. (2011) From Burden to “Best Buys”: Reducing the Economic Impact of Non-Communicable Diseases in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Program on the Global Demography of Aging working paper no. 7511. https://ideas.repec.org/p/gdm/wpaper/7511.html Google Scholar
Kryston, TB, Georgiev, AB, Pissis, P, et al. (2011) Role of oxidative stress and DNA damage in human carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 711, 193201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, PG, McCallum, GP, Chen, CS, et al. (2009) Oxidative stress in developmental origins of disease: teratogenesis, neurodevelopmental deficits, and cancer. Toxicol Sci 108, 418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, KA & Tollefsbol, TO (2017) The influence of an epigenetics diet on the cancer epigenome. Epigenomics 9, 11531155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neri, M, Bonassi, S, Knudsen, LE, et al. (2006) Children’s exposure to environmental pollutants and biomarkers of genetic damage: I. Overview and critical issues. Mutat Res 612, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastorci, F, Traghella, I, Sabatino, L, et al. (2019) Oxidative stress and cardiovascular risk and prevention in children and adolescents. In Oxidative Stress in Heart Diseases, pp. 318 [Chakraborti, S, Dhalla, N, Ganguly, N and Dikshit, M, editors]. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tain, Y-L & Hsu, C-N (2017) Interplay between oxidative stress and nutrient sensing signaling in the developmental origins of cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci 18, 841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barouki, R, Gluckman, PD, Grandjean, P, et al. (2012) Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: implications for research and public health. Environ Health 11, 42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvini, S, Sera, F, Caruso, D, et al. (2006) Daily consumption of a high-phenol extra-virgin olive oil reduces oxidative DNA damage in postmenopausal women. Br J Nutr 95, 742751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helmersson, J, Ärnlöv, J, Larsson, A, et al. (2008) Low dietary intake of β-carotene, α-tocopherol and ascorbic acid is associated with increased inflammatory and oxidative stress status in a Swedish cohort. Br J Nutr 101, 17751782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D, Ferguson, K, Troester, MA, et al. (2019) Tea consumption and oxidative stress: a cross-sectional analysis of 889 premenopausal women from the Sister Study. Br J Nutr 121, 582590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C, Milne, GL, Sandler, DP, et al. (2016) Oxidative stress in relation to diet and physical activity among premenopausal women. Br J Nutr 116, 14161424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, LL, Chiou, C-C, Chang, P-Y, et al. (2004) Urinary 8-OHdG: a marker of oxidative stress to DNA and a risk factor for cancer, atherosclerosis and diabetics. Clin Chim Acta 339, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valavanidis, A, Vlachogianni, T & Fiotakis, C (2009) 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG): a critical biomarker of oxidative stress and carcinogenesis. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 27, 120139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honda, M, Yamada, Y, Tomonaga, M, et al. (2000) Correlation of urinary 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage, and clinical features of hematological disorders: a pilot study. Leuk Res 24, 461468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Minno, A, Turnu, L, Porro, B, et al. (2017) 8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine levels and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 27, 201208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Minno, A, Turnu, L, Porro, B, et al. (2016) 8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine levels and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Antioxid Redox Signal 24, 548555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qing, X, Shi, D, Lv, X, et al. (2019) Prognostic significance of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 19, 997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, P & Loft, S (2006) Dietary antioxidants and beneficial effect on oxidatively damaged DNA. Free Radic Biol Med 41, 388415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loft, S & Møller, P (2006) Oxidative DNA damage and human cancer: need for cohort studies. Antioxid Redox Signal 8, 10211031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, MS, Olinski, R & Loft, S (2008) Measurement and meaning of oxidatively modified DNA lesions in urine. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17, 314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, PM, Mistry, V, Marczylo, TH, et al. (2012) Rapid measurement of 8-oxo-7, 8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine in human biological matrices using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Free Radic Biol Med 52, 20572063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, CA, Moubarac, JC, Cannon, G, et al. (2013) Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev 14, 2128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, P & Friel, S (2016) Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia. Global Health 12, 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moubarac, J-C, Batal, M, Martins, APB, et al. (2014) Processed and ultra-processed food products: consumption trends in Canada from 1938 to 2011. Can J Diet Pract Res 75, 1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva Meneguelli, T, Viana Hinkelmann, J, Hermsdorff, HHM, et al. (2020) Food consumption by degree of processing and cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review. Int J Food Sci Nutr (epublication ahead of print version 13 February 2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rico-Campà, A, Martínez-González, MA, Alvarez-Alvarez, I, et al. (2019) Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and all cause mortality: SUN prospective cohort study. BMJ 365, l1949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco-Rojo, R, Sandoval-Insausti, H, López-Garcia, E, et al. (2019) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and mortality: a national prospective cohort in Spain. Mayo Clin Proc 94, 21782188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiolet, T, Srour, B, Sellem, L, et al. (2018) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. BMJ 360, k322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Moubarac, J-C, et al. (2018) The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr 21, 517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, CS, Del-Ponte, B, Assunção, MCF, et al. (2018) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and body fat during childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 21, 148159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juul, F, Martinez-Steele, E, Parekh, N, et al. (2018) Ultra-processed food consumption and excess weight among US adults. Br J Nutr 120, 90100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trudeau, K, Rousseau, M-C & Parent, M-É (2020) Extent of food processing and risk of prostate cancer: the PROtEuS study in Montreal, Canada. Nutrients 12, 637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marti, A (2019) Ultra-processed foods are not “real food” but really affect your health. Nutrients 11, 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourd, E (2018) Ultra-processed foods might increase cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 19, e186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srour, B, Fezeu, LK, Kesse-Guyot, E, et al. (2019) Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé). BMJ 365, l1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlassara, H & Striker, GE (2011) AGE restriction in diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7, 526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, KE, Prasad, C, Vijayagopal, P, et al. (2015) Contribution of dietary advanced glycation end products (AGE) to circulating AGE: role of dietary fat. Br J Nutr 114, 17971806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Carvalho, AM, Carioca, AAF, Fisberg, RM, et al. (2016) Joint association of fruit, vegetable, and heterocyclic amine intake with DNA damage levels in a general population. Nutrition 32, 260264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Bo, C, Marino, M, Martini, D, et al. (2019) Overview of human intervention studies evaluating the impact of the mediterranean diet on markers of DNA damage. Nutrients 11, 391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giovannelli, L, Saieva, C, Masala, G, et al. (2002) Nutritional and lifestyle determinants of DNA oxidative damage: a study in a Mediterranean population. Carcinogenesis 23, 14831489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J, Yang, Y, Yang, Y, et al. (2011) Diet quality scores and oxidative stress in Korean adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 1271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, G & Streiner, D (2000) Biostatistics: the Bare Essentials. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker Inc.Google Scholar
Asghari, G, Rezazadeh, A, Hosseini-Esfahani, F, et al. (2012) Reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns derived from an FFQ in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Br J Nutr 108, 11091117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghafarpour, M, Houshiar-Rad, A, Kianfar, H, et al. (1999) The Manual for Household Measures, Cooking Yields Factors and Edible Portion of Food. Tehran: Nashre Olume Keshavarzy.Google Scholar
Moubarac, J-C, Parra, DC, Cannon, G, et al. (2014) Food classification systems based on food processing: significance and implications for policies and actions: a systematic literature review and assessment. Curr Obes Rep 3, 256272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Nutrient Data Laboratory (2018) USDA Food Composition Databases. https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list Google Scholar
Banna, JC, McCrory, MA, Fialkowski, MK, et al. (2017) Examining plausibility of self-reported energy intake data: considerations for method selection. Front Nutr 4, 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trichopoulou, A, Costacou, T, Bamia, C, et al. (2003) Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med 348, 25992608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, R, Chan, D & Woo, J (2013) A cross sectional study to examine the association between dietary patterns and cognitive impairment in older Chinese people in Hong Kong. J Nutr Health Aging 17, 757765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2007) Growth Reference Data for 5–19 Years. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/growthref/who2007_bmi_for_age/en/ Google Scholar
Aadahl, M & Jørgensen, T (2003) Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35, 11961202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziaee, V, Kelishadi, R, Ardalan, G, et al. (2006) Physical activity in Iranian students CASPIAN Study. Iran J Pediatr 16, 157164.Google Scholar
Croft, M, Tong, P, Fuentes, D, et al. (2004) Australian survey of acrylamide in carbohydrate-based foods. Food Addit Contam 21, 721736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shakeri, F, Shakeri, S, Ghasemi, S, et al. (2019) Effects of formulation and baking process on acrylamide formation in Kolompeh, a traditional cookie in Iran. J Chem 2019, 1425098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razia, S, Bertrand, M, Klaus, V, et al. (2016) Investigation of acrylamide levels in branded biscuits, cakes and potato chips commonly consumed in Pakistan. Int Food Res J 23, 21872192.Google Scholar
Rufian-Henares, JA, Arribas-Lorenzo, G & Morales, FJ (2007) Acrylamide content of selected Spanish foods: survey of biscuits and bread derivatives. Food Addit Contam 24, 343350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eslamizad, S, Kobarfard, F, Tsitsimpikou, C, et al. (2019) Health risk assessment of acrylamide in bread in Iran using LC-MS/MS. Food Chem Toxicol 126, 162168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadeghi, E, Yeganeh, S, Shoeibi, S, et al. (2016) Determination of acrylamide in traditional and industrial breads: a case study: Tehran, Iran. IJPT 8, 1288112892.Google Scholar
Boyacı Gündüz, CP & Cengiz, MF (2015) Acrylamide contents of commonly consumed bread types in Turkey. Int J Food Prop 18, 833841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamla, L & Nisha, P (2014) Acrylamide in deep-fried snacks of India. Food Addit Contam 7, 220225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powers, SJ, Mottram, DS, Curtis, A, et al. (2017) Acrylamide levels in potato crisps in Europe from 2002 to 2016. Food Addit Contam 34, 20852100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guenther, H, Anklam, E, Wenzl, T, et al. (2007) Acrylamide in coffee: review of progress in analysis, formation and level reduction. Food Addit Contam 24, 6070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seal, CJ, De Mul, A, Eisenbrand, G, et al. (2008) Risk-benefit considerations of mitigation measures on acrylamide content of foods–a case study on potatoes, cereals and coffee. Br J Nutr 99, S1S46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normandin, L, Bouchard, M, Ayotte, P, et al. (2013) Dietary exposure to acrylamide in adolescents from a Canadian urban center. Food Chem Toxicol 57, 7583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2002) Health Implications of Acrylamide in Food: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland, 25–27 June 2002 (Food Safety Consultations). no. 9241562188. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Tritscher, AM (2004) Human health risk assessment of processing-related compounds in food. Toxicol Lett 149, 177186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogervorst, JG, Baars, B-J, Schouten, LJ, et al. (2010) The carcinogenicity of dietary acrylamide intake: a comparative discussion of epidemiological and experimental animal research. Crit Rev Toxicol 40, 485512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besaratinia, A & Pfeifer, GP (2007) A review of mechanisms of acrylamide carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis 28, 519528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riboldi, BP, Vinhas, ÁM & Moreira, JD (2014) Risks of dietary acrylamide exposure: a systematic review. Food Chem 157, 310322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcason, W (2016) What’s the latest on acrylamide? J Acad Nutr Diet 116, 1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinöcker, MK & Lindseth, IA (2018) The Western diet–microbiome–host interaction and its role in metabolic disease. Nutrients 10, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leo, EEM & Campos, MRS (2019) Effect of ultra-processed diet on gut microbiota and thus its role in neurodegenerative diseases. Nutrition 71, 110609.Google Scholar
Shi, Z (2019) Gut microbiota: an important link between Western diet and chronic diseases. Nutrients 11, 2287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, RE, Dordevic, AL, Tan, SM, et al. (2016) Dietary advanced glycation end products and risk factors for chronic disease: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Nutrients 8, 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, V, Kumar, V, Singh, K, et al. (2019) Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) may be a striking link between modern diet and health. Biomolecules 9, 888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cioffi, F, Senese, R, Lasala, P, et al. (2017) Fructose-rich diet affects mitochondrial DNA damage and repair in rats. Nutrients 9, 323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, RB, Alderete, TL, Kim, JS, et al. (2019) High intake of dietary fructose in overweight/obese teenagers associated with depletion of Eubacterium and Streptococcus in gut microbiome. Gut Microbes 10, 712719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yen, G-C, Liao, C-M & Wu, S-C (2002) Influence of Maillard reaction products on DNA damage in human lymphocytes. J Agric Food Chem 50, 29702976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seiquer, I, Rubio, LA, Peinado, MJ, et al. (2014) Maillard reaction products modulate gut microbiota composition in adolescents. Mol Nutr Food Res 58, 15521560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fardet, A (2016) Minimally processed foods are more satiating and less hyperglycemic than ultra-processed foods: a preliminary study with 98 ready-to-eat foods. Food Funct 7, 23382346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahado-Singh, P, Wheatley, A, Ahmad, M, et al. (2006) Food processing methods influence the glycaemic indices of some commonly eaten West Indian carbohydrate-rich foods. Br J Nutr 96, 476481.Google ScholarPubMed
Enes, CC, Camargo, CMd & Justino, MIC (2019) Ultra-processed food consumption and obesity in adolescents. Rev Nutr 32, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslami, O & Khoshgoo, M & Shidfar, F (2020) Dietary phytochemical index and overweight/obesity in children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes 13, 132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez, MA, Popkin, BM, Jakszyn, P, et al. (2006) Adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with reduced 3-year incidence of obesity. J Nutr 136, 29342938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brisson, B, Ayotte, P, Normandin, L, et al. (2014) Relation between dietary acrylamide exposure and biomarkers of internal dose in Canadian teenagers. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 24, 215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, SY, Ko, A, Kang, H-S, et al. (2019) Association of urinary acrylamide concentration with lifestyle and demographic factors in a population of South Korean children and adolescents. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26, 1824718255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2002) FAO/WHO Consultation on the Health Implications of Acrylamide in Food-Summary Report. no. 1–12. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Anese, M, Suman, M & Nicoli, MC (2009) Technological strategies to reduce acrylamide levels in heated foods. Food Eng Rev 1, 169179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrinis, G & Monteiro, CA (2018) Ultra-processed foods and the limits of product reformulation. Public Health Nutr 21, 247252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allemandi, L, Castronuovo, L, Tiscornia, MV, et al. (2018) Food advertising on Argentinean television: are ultra-processed foods in the lead? Public Health Nutr 21, 238246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallarino, C, Gómez, LF, González-Zapata, L, et al. (2013) Advertising of ultra-processed foods and beverages: children as a vulnerable population. Rev Saúde Pública 47, 10061010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noll, M, de Abreu, LC, Baracat, EC, et al. (2019) Ultra-processed food consumption by Brazilian adolescents in cafeterias and school meals. Sci Rep 9, 7162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siddiqi, S, Masud, TI, Nishtar, S, et al. (2009) Framework for assessing governance of the health system in developing countries: gateway to good governance. Health Policy 90, 1325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandevijvere, S, Dominick, C, Devi, A, et al. (2015) The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand. Bull World Health Organ 93, 294302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S, Hawk, T, Aggarwal, A, et al. (2019) Characterizing ultra-processed foods by energy density, nutrient density, and cost. Front Nutr 6, 70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGill, R, Anwar, E, Orton, L, et al. (2015) Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact. BMC Public Health 15, 457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neff, RA, Palmer, AM, McKenzie, SE, et al. (2009) Food systems and public health disparities. J Hunger Environ Nutr 4, 282314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branca, F, Lartey, A, Oenema, S, et al. (2019) Transforming the food system to fight non-communicable diseases. BMJ 364, l296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tryfidou, DV, McClean, C, Nikolaidis, MG, et al. (2020) DNA damage following acute aerobic exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 50, 103127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curwin, BD, Hein, MJ, Barr, DB, et al. (2010) Comparison of immunoassay and HPLC-MS/MS used to measure urinary metabolites of atrazine, metolachlor, and chlorpyrifos from farmers and non-farmers in Iowa. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 20, 205212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossner, P Jr & Sram, RJ (2012) Immunochemical detection of oxidatively damaged DNA. Free Radic Res 46, 492522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, M-F, Li, Y-S, Ootsuyama, Y, et al. (2009) Urea, the most abundant component in urine, cross-reacts with a commercial 8-OH-dG ELISA kit and contributes to overestimation of urinary 8-OH-dG. Free Radic Biol Med 47, 4146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, MD, Olinski, R, Loft, S, et al. (2010) Toward consensus in the analysis of urinary 8-oxo-7, 8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine as a noninvasive biomarker of oxidative stress. FASEB J 24, 12491260.Google ScholarPubMed
Guo, C, Li, X, Wang, R, et al. (2016) Association between oxidative DNA damage and risk of colorectal cancer: sensitive determination of urinary 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine by UPLC-MS/MS analysis. Sci Rep 6, 32581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelishadi, R, Mirghaffari, N, Poursafa, P, et al. (2009) Lifestyle and environmental factors associated with inflammation, oxidative stress and insulin resistance in children. Atherosclerosis 203, 311319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, L, Cui, X, Xia, Q, et al. (2020) Effects of personal air pollutant exposure on oxidative stress: potential confounding by natural variation in melatonin levels. Int J Hyg Environ Health 223, 116123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fangupo, LJ, Haszard, JJ, Leong, C, et al. (2019) Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess energy intake from minimally processed and ultra-processed foods in young children. Nutrients 11, 1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Participant characteristics and dietary intakes in total population and according to tertiles (T) of ultra-processed food intake in adolescents in the present study(Mean values and standard deviations; geometric mean values and 95 % confidence intervals; numbers and percentages)

Figure 1

Table 2. Main contribution of ultra-processed food intake in adolescents in the present study(Percentages)

Figure 2

Table 3. Urinary concentration of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG8)/creatinine according to tertiles of ultra-processed food group consumption in adolescents in the present study(Geometric mean (GM) values and 95 % confidence intervals)

Supplementary material: File

Edalati et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Edalati et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB
You have Access
13
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with higher DNA damage in healthy adolescents
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with higher DNA damage in healthy adolescents
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with higher DNA damage in healthy adolescents
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *