Skip to main content

Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality

  • G. Sarwar Gilani (a1), Chao Wu Xiao (a1) and Kevin A. Cockell (a1)

Dietary antinutritional factors have been reported to adversely affect the digestibility of protein, bioavailability of amino acids and protein quality of foods. Published data on these negative effects of major dietary antinutritional factors are summarized in this manuscript. Digestibility and the quality of mixed diets in developing countries are considerably lower than of those in developed regions. For example, the digestibility of protein in traditional diets from developing countries such as India, Guatemala and Brazil is considerably lower compared to that of protein in typical North American diets (54–78 versus 88–94 %). Poor digestibility of protein in the diets of developing countries, which are based on less refined cereals and grain legumes as major sources of protein, is due to the presence of less digestible protein fractions, high levels of insoluble fibre, and/or high concentrations of antinutritional factors present endogenously or formed during processing. Examples of naturally occurring antinutritional factors include glucosinolates in mustard and canola protein products, trypsin inhibitors and haemagglutinins in legumes, tannins in legumes and cereals, gossypol in cottonseed protein products, and uricogenic nucleobases in yeast protein products. Heat/alkaline treatments of protein products may yield Maillard reaction compounds, oxidized forms of sulphur amino acids, D-amino acids and lysinoalanine (LAL, an unnatural nephrotoxic amino acid derivative). Among common food and feed protein products, soyabeans are the most concentrated source of trypsin inhibitors. The presence of high levels of dietary trypsin inhibitors from soyabeans, kidney beans or other grain legumes have been reported to cause substantial reductions in protein and amino acid digestibility (up to 50 %) and protein quality (up to 100 %) in rats and/or pigs. Similarly, the presence of high levels of tannins in sorghum and other cereals, fababean and other grain legumes can cause significant reductions (up to 23 %) in protein and amino acid digestibility in rats, poultry, and pigs. Normally encountered levels of phytates in cereals and legumes can reduce protein and amino acid digestibility by up to 10 %. D-amino acids and LAL formed during alkaline/heat treatment of lactalbumin, casein, soya protein or wheat protein are poorly digestible (less than 40 %), and their presence can reduce protein digestibility by up to 28 % in rats and pigs, and can cause a drastic reduction (100 %) in protein quality, as measured by rat growth methods. The adverse effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and protein quality have been reported to be more pronounced in elderly rats (20-months old) compared to young (5-weeks old) rats, suggesting the use of old rats as a model for assessing the protein digestibility of products intended for the elderly.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr. G. S. Gilani, fax 1-613-941-6182, email
Hide All
1Pellett PL (1996) World essential amino acid supply with special reference to South-East Asia. Food Nutr Bull 17, 3, 204234.
2Sarwar G (1987) Digestibility of protein and bioavailability of amino acids in foods. World Rev Nutr Diet 54, 2670.
3FAO/WHO-United Nations University (1985) Energy and Protein Requirements; Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation, WHO Tech Rep Ser no. 724. Geneva: WHO.
4Hopkins DT (1981) Effects of variation in protein digestibility. In Protein Quality in Humans: Assessment and In Vitro Estimation, pp. 169193 [, editors]. Westport, Connecticut: AVI Publishing.
5Gilani GS, Cockell KA & Sepehr E (2005) Effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and amino acid availability in foods. J AOAC Int 88, 967987.
6Sarwar G & Brulé D (1991) Assessment of the uricogenic potential of processed foods based on the nature and quantity of dietary purines. Prog Food Nutr Sci 15, 159181.
7Friedman M & Brandon DL (2001) Nutritional and health benefits of soy proteins. J Agr Food Chem 49, 10691086.
8Liener IE (1994) Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34, 3167.
9Anderson RL & Wolf WJ (1995) Compositional changes in trypsin inhibitors, phytic acid, saponins and isoflavones related to soybean processing. J Nutr 125, 581S585S.
10Miyagi M, Shinjo S, Nishida R, et al. (1997) Trypsin inhibitor activity in commercial soybean products in Japan. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 43, 575580.
11Giami SY (2002) Chemical composition and nutritional attributes of selected newly developed lines of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr). J Sci Food Agri 82, 17351739.
12Radha C, Kumar PR & Prakash V (2008) Enzymatic modification as a tool to improve the functional properties of heat-processed soy flour. J Sci Food Agric 88, 336343.
13Peace RW, Sarwar G & Touchburn SP (1992) Trypsin inhibitor levels in soy-based infant formulas and commercial soy protein isolates and concentrates. Food Res Int 25, 137141.
14Gatel F (1994) Protein quality of legume seeds for non-ruminant animals: a literature review. Anim Feed Sci Tech 45, 317348.
15El-Adaway TA (2002) Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of chick peas (Cicer arietinum L.) undergoing different cooking methods and germination. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 57, 8397.
16Vadivel V & Janardhanan (2005) Nutritional and antinutritional characteristics of seven South Indian wild legumes. Plant Food Hum Nutr 60, 6975.
17Shimelis EA & Rakshit SK (2007) Effect of processing on antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in East Africa. Food Chem 103, 161172.
18Betancur-Ancona D, Gallegos-Tintoré S, Delgado-Herrera , et al. (2008) Some physiochemical and antinutritional properties of raw flours and protein isolates from Mucuna pruriens (velvet bean) and Canavalia ensiformis (jack bean). Int J Food Sci Technol 43, 816823.
19Rackis JJ (1974) Biological and physiological factors in soybeans. J Am Oil Chem Soc 51, 161A.
20Huang W, Wood C, L'Abbe MR, et al. (2005) Soy protein isolate increases hepatic thyroid hormone receptor content and inhibits its binding to target genes in rats. J Nutr 135, 16311635.
21Li S, Sauer WC, Huang S, et al. (1998) Response of pancreatic secretions to feeding diets with low and high levels of soybean trypsin inhibitors in growing pigs. J Sci Food Agric 76, 347356.
22Wu W, Woodie P, Williams M, et al. (1996) Amino acid availability and availability-corrected amino acid score of red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Agr Food Chem 44, 12961301.
23Sarwar G & Peace RW (1986) Comparisons between true digestibility of total nitrogen and limiting amino acids in vegetable proteins fed to rats. J Nutr 116, 11721184.
24Lewis JH & Taylor FHL (1947) Comparative utilization of raw and autoclaved soybean protein by the human. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 85.
25Jansman AFJ, Frohlich AA & Marquardt RR (1994) Production of proline-rich proteins by the parotid glands of rats is enhanced by feeding diets containing tannins from faba beans (Vicia faba L.). J Nutr 124, 249258.
26Salunkhe DK, Chavan JK & Kadam SS (1990) Occurrence, nature and composition. In Dietary Tannins: Consequences and Remedies, pp. 2968 [, editors]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
27Jansman AJM & Longstaff M (1993) Nutritional effects of tannins and vicine/covicine in legume seeds. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on “Antinutritional Factors (ANFS) in Legume Seeds”, pp. 301316 [, editors]. Wageningen: Pers Wageningen.
28Krépon K, Marget P, Peyronnet C, et al. (2010) Nutritional value of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds for feed and food. Field Crop Res 115, 329339.
29Ahmed AE, Smithard R & Ellis M (1991) Activities of enzymes of the pancreas, and the lumen and mucosa of the small intestine in growing broiler cockerels fed on tannin-containing diets. Br J Nutr 65, 189197.
30Duodu KG, Taylor JRN, Belton PS, et al. (2003) Factors affecting sorghum protein digestibility. J Cereal Sci 38, 117131.
31Jansman AJM, Verstegen MWA, Huisman J, et al. (1995) Effects of hulls of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) With a low or high contents of condensed tannins on the apparent ileal and fecal digestibility of nutrients and the excretion of endogenous protein in ileal digesta and feces of pigs. J Anim Sci 73, 118127.
32Elkin RG, Freed MB, Hamaker BR, et al. (1996) Condensed tannins are only partially responsible for variations in nutrient digestibilities of sorghum grain cultivars. J Agri Food Chem 44, 848853.
33Mehansho H, Asquith TN, Butler LG, et al. (1992) Tannin-mediated induction of proline-rich protein synthesis. J Agri Food Chem 40, 9397.
34Harland BF & Oberleas D (1987) Phytates in foods. Wld Rev Nutr Diet 52, 235259.
35Lott JNA, Ockenden I, Raboy Raboy, et al. (2002) Phytic acid and phosphorus in crop grain seeds and fruits. In Food Phytates, pp. 724 [, editors]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
36Ravindran V, Cabahug S, Ravindran G, et al. (1999) Influence of microbial phytase on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility of food stuffs for broilers. Poultry Sci 78, 699706.
37Torrie M, Rodrigez AR & Saura-Calixto P (1991) Effects of dietary fiber and phytic acid on mineral availability. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1, 122.
38Reddy NR (2002) Occurrence, distribution, content and dietary intake of phytate. In Food Phytates, pp. 2552 [, editors]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
39Selle PH, Ravindran V, Caldwell RA, et al. (2000) Phytate and phytase; consequences for protein utilisation. Nutr Res Rev 13, 255278.
40Li Z, Alli I & Kermasha S (1993) In vitro alpha-amylase inhibitor activity-phytate relationships in proteins from Phaseolus beans. Food Res 26, 195201.
41Chitra U, Vimala V, Singh U, et al. (1995) Variability in phytic acid content and protein digestibility of grain legumes. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 47, 163172.
42Batista KA, Prudêncio SH & Fernandes KE (2010) Changes in functional properties and antinutritional factors of extruded hard-to-cook common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Food Sci 75, C286C290.
43Porres JM, Urbano G, Fernández-Figares I, et al. (2002) Digestive utilization of protein and amino acids from raw and heated lentils by growing rats. J Sci Food Agri 82, 17401747.
44Ryden P & Selvendran RR (1993) In Encyclopedia of Food Science, Food Technology, and Nutrition, pp. 35823587 [, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45Vaintraub IA & Bulmaga VP (1991) Effect of phytate on the in vitro activity of digestive proteinases. J Agri Food Chem 39, 859861.
46Lothia D, Hoch H & Kievernagel Y (1987) Influence of phytate on in vitro digestibility of casein under physiological conditions. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 37, 229235.
47Antony U & Chnadra TS (1999) Enzymatic treatment and use of starters for the nutrient enhancement in fermented flour of red and white varieties of finger millet (Eleusine coracana). J Agri Food Chem 47, 20162019.
48Ravindran V, Selle PH, Ravindran G, et al. (2001) Microbial phytase improves performance, apparent metabolizable energy, and ileal amino acid digestibility of broilers fed a lysine-deficient diet. Poultry Sci 80, 338344.
49Brulé D, Sarwar G, Savoie L, et al. (1988) Differences in uricogenic effects of dietary purine bases, nucleosides and nucleotides in rats. J Nutr 118, 780786.
50Brulé D, Sarwar G & Savoie L (1988) Purine contents of selected Canadian food products. J Food Comp Anal 1, 130138.
51FAO/WHO (1975) PAG ad hoc working group on clinical evaluation and acceptance of nucleic acids of SCP for human consumption. In Protein-Calorie Advisory Group (PAG) of the United Nations System Bulletin 5, pp. 1726.
52Kreuger A (1976) Adenine metabolism during and after exchange transfusion in newborn infants with CPD-adenine blood. Translation 16, 249252.
53Rérat A, Calmes R, Vaissade P, et al. (2002) Nutritional and metabolic consequences of the early Maillard reaction of heat treated milk in the pig. Significance for man. Eur J Nutr 41, 111.
54Erbersdobler HF (1989) Protein reactions during food processing and storage and their relevance to human nutrition. Bibl Nutr Dieta 43, 140155.
55Rufián-Henares JA, Guerra-Hernandez E & Garcia-Villanova B (2001) Determination of furfural compounds in enteral formulas. J Liquid Chrom Relat Technolo 24, 30493062.
56Finot PA (1990) Metabolic and physiological consequences of Maillard reaction products. In The Maillard Reaction in Food Processing, Human Nutrition and Physiology, pp. 259272 [, editors]. Basel: Birkhauser.
57Seiquer I, Díaz-Alguacil J, Delgado-Andrade C, et al. (2006) Diets rich in Maillard reaction products affect protein digestibility in adolescent males aged 11–14 y. Am J Nutr 83, 10821088.
58Rudolff S & Lönnerdal B (1992) Solubility and digestibility of milk proteins in infant formulas exposed to different heat treatments. J Pediatr Gastr Nutr 15, 2533.
59Sarwar G, Peace RW & Botting HG (1989) Differences in protein digestibility and quality of liquid concentrates and powder forms of milk-based formulas fed to rats. Am J Clin Nutr 49, 806813.
60Friedman M (1999) Chemistry, nutrition, and microbiology of D-amino acids. J Agr Food Chem 47, 34573479.
61Friedman M (1991) Formation, nutritional value and safety of D-amino acids. In Nutritional and Toxicological Consequences of Food Processing, pp. 447481 [, editor]. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press.
62Csapó J, Albert Cs & Csapóo-Kiss Zs (2009) The D-amino acid content of foodstuffs (A Review). Acta Univ Sapientiae Alimentaria 2, 530.
63Payan IL, Cadilla-Perezrios R, Fisher GH, et al. (1985) Analysis of problems encountered in the determination of amino acid enantiomeric ratios by gas chromatography. Anal Biochem 149, 484491.
64Masters PM & Friedman M (1980) Amino acid racemisation in alkali-treated food proteins-chemistry, toxicology, and nutritional consequences. In Chemical Deterioration of Proteins, pp. 165194 [, editors]. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
65Finley JW (1985) Environmental effects of protein quality. In Chemical Changes in Food Processing, pp. 443482Inst. Food Technologies Basic Symp SerWestport, Connecticut: AVI Publishing.
66Palla G, Marchelli R, Dossena G, et al. (1989) Occurrence of D-amino acids in food. Detection by capillary gas chromatography and by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with L-phenylalanine amides as chiral selectors. J Chromatogr 475, 4553.
67Struthers BJ, Dahlgren RR, Hopkins DT, et al. (1979) Lysinolanine: biological effects and significance. In Soy Protein and Human Nutrition, pp. 235260 [, editors]. New York, NY: Academic Press.
68Finot PA (1983) Lysinoalanine in food proteins. Rev Clin Nutr 53, 6780.
69Friedman M (1999) Chemistry, biochemistry, nutrition and microbiology of lysinoalanine, lanthionine, and histidinoalanine in food and other proteins. J Agr Food Chem 47, 12951319.
70Pappenheimer JR, Karnovsky ML & Maggio JE (1997) Absorption and excretion of undegradable peptides: role of lipid solubility and net charge. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 280, 292300.
71de Vrese M, Frik R, Roos N, et al. (2000) Protein-bound D-amino acids, and to a lesser extent lysinoalanine, decrease true ileal protein digestibility in minipigs as determined with 15N-labeling. J Nutr 130, 20262203.
72International Life Sciences Institute (1989) Mechanism of toxicity of lysinoalanine. Nutr Rev 47, 362364.
73Sternberg M, Kim CY & Schwende FJ (1975) Lysinoalanine: presence in foods and food ingredients. Science 190, 992994.
74Gould DH & MacGregor JT (1977) Biological effects of alkali-treated protein and lysinoalanine: an overview. In Protein Crosslinking: Nutritional and Medical Consequences, pp. 2948 [, editor]. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
75Karayiannis N, MacGregor JT & Bjeldanes LF (1979) Biological effects of alkali-treated soy protein and lactalbumin in the rat and mouse. Food Cosmet Toxicol 17, 591604.
76DeGroot AP, Slump P, Feron WJ, et al. (1976) Feeding of alkali-treated proteins: feeding studies with free and protein-bound lysinoalanine in rats and other animals. J Nutr 106, 15271538.
77Woodard JC (1975) Renal toxicity of Nε-DL (2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-L-lysine, lysinoalanine. Vet Path 12, 6566.
78Slump P (1978) Lysinoalanine in alkali treated proteins and factors influencing its biological activity. Annales de la Nutr et de l'Alimentation 32, 271279.
79Sarwar G, L'Abbé MR, Trick K, et al. (1999) Influence of feeding alkaline/heat processed proteins on growth and protein and mineral status of rats. Adv Exp Med Biol 459, 161177.
80Friedman M, Zahnley JC & Masters PM (1981) Relationship between in vitro digestibility of casein and its contents of lysinoalanine and D-amino acids. J Food Sci 46, 127131.
81Friedman M, Gumbmann MR & Savoie L (1982) The nutritional value of lysinoalanine as a source of lysine. Nutr Rep Int 26, 937943.
82Robbins KR, Baker DH & Finley JW (1980) Studies on the utilization of lysinoalanine and lanthionine. J Nutr 110, 907915.
83Sarwar G & Peace RW (1994) The protein quality of some enteral products is inferior to that of casein as assessed by rat growth methods and digestibility-corrected amino acid scores. J Nutr 124, 22232232.
84Pompei C, Rossi M & Mare F (1987) Protein quality in commercial milk-based infant formulas. J Food Quality 10, 375391.
85Lister N, Sykes AP, Baily PD, et al. (1995) Dipeptide transport and hydrolysis in isolated loops of rat small intestine: effects of stereospecificity. J Physiol London 484, 173182.
86Paquet A, Thresher WC, Swaisgood HE, et al. (1985) Synthesis and digestibility determination of some epimeric tripeptides occurring in dietary proteins. Nutr Res 5, 891901.
87Sarwar G, Paquet A & Peace RW (1985) Bioavailability of methionine in some tripeptides occurring in dietary proteins as determined by rat growth. Nutr Res 5, 903909.
88FAO/WHO (1991) Protein quality evaluation; report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 51. Rome: FAO.
89Gilani GS & Sepehr E (2003) Protein digestibility and quality in products containing antinutritional factors are adversely affected by old age in rats. J Nutr 133, 220225.
90Moughan PJ & Rutherford SM (1996) A new method for determining digestible reactive lysine in foods. J Agr Food Chem 64, 22022209.
91Lalles SP & Toullec R (1994) Trypsin loss at the ileum of calves fed milk replacers containing legume protein. Ann Zootech 43, 263.
92Greenberg RE & Holt PR (1986) Influence of aging upon pancreatic digestive enzymes. Dig Dis Sci 31, 970977.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 135
Total number of PDF views: 1220 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1382 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.