Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-ls6xp Total loading time: 1.277 Render date: 2022-11-26T11:43:57.599Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Non-soya legume-based therapeutic lifestyle change diet reduces inflammatory status in diabetic patients: a randomised cross-over clinical trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2015

Somayeh Hosseinpour-Niazi
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Endocrine Research Center, Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Parvin Mirmiran*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Arefeh Fallah-Ghohroudi
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Endocrine Research Center, Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Fereidoun Azizi
Affiliation:
Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: P. Mirmiran, fax +98 21 224 16 264 and +98 21 224 02 463, email mirmiran@endocrine.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present randomised cross-over clinical trial investigated the effects of two intervention diets (non-soya legume-based therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC) diet v. isoenergetic legume-free TLC diet) on inflammatory biomarkers among type 2 diabetic patients. A group of thirty-one participants (twenty-four women and seven men; weight 74·5 (sd 7·0) kg; age 58·1 (sd 6·0) years) were randomly assigned to one of the two following intervention diets for 8 weeks: legume-free TLC diet or non-soya legume-based TLC diet. The latter diet was the same as the legume-free TLC diet, except that two servings of red meat were replaced with different types of cooked non-soya legumes such as lentils, chickpeas, peas and beans over a period of 3 d per week. The intervention period was followed by a washout period of 4 weeks, after which the groups followed the alternate treatment for 8 weeks. Concentrations of inflammatory markers were measured at baseline and after the intervention periods. Compared with the legume-free TLC diet, the non-soya legume-based TLC diet significantly decreased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6 and TNF-α in overweight diabetic patients. The replacement of two servings of red meat by non-soya legumes in the isoenergetic TLC diet for a period of 3 d per week reduced the plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers among overweight diabetic patients, independent of weight change.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Diabetes is a disease characterised by a hyperglycaemic state that leads to a chronic inflammatory status( Reference King 1 ). In addition, co-morbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, central obesity and insulin resistance that act simultaneously with hyperglycaemia have been involved in the exacerbation of inflammatory status in diabetic patients( Reference Goldberg 2 ). Chronic inflammation plays a major role in the pathogenesis of its secondary complications such as atherothrombosis, nephropathy, retinopathy, CVD and insulin resistance in these patients( Reference King 1 Reference Spranger, Kroke and Möhlig 3 ).

Diet is the first line of intervention for preventing and treating diabetes, and its complications such as inflammation. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the role of different dietary determinants in the modulation of inflammation. Diets rich in anti-inflammatory components such as fibre, Mg and phenolic compounds constitute a promising preventive strategy against increasing inflammation( Reference Weglarz, Wawszczyk and Orchel 4 Reference Nilsson, Johansson and Ekström 8 ). These components reduce inflammation by decreasing lipid oxidation and hyperglycaemia, and by down-regulating genes involved in the inflammatory pathway( Reference Chacko, Song and Nathan 9 Reference González, Ballester and López-Posadas 11 ). Moreover, a diet with a low glycaemic index has been reported to be inversely associated with inflammatory marker levels( Reference Griffith, Ma and Chasan-Taber 12 ). Foods with a high glycaemic index have been shown to induce hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia that may lead to the production of advanced glycation end products, which may stimulate the liver to increase the production of acute-phase reactants( Reference Liu, Manson and Buring 13 ).

Legumes have a low glycaemic index, and also contain high contents of anti-inflammatory nutrients such as fibre, Mg and phenolic compounds( Reference Bouchenak and Lamri-Senhadji 14 ). Previous cross-sectional studies have reported that dietary patterns with higher intakes of legumes are inversely associated with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)( Reference Lopez-Garcia, Schulze and Fung 15 , Reference Esmaillzadeh, Kimiagar and Mehrabi 16 ). However, some clinical trials evaluating the effect of dietary legumes on inflammation have documented inconsistent results; inclusion of legumes in the diet has been reported to modulate the levels of inflammatory markers among obese subjects( Reference Hermsdorff, Zulet and Abete 17 ) and subjects at risk for colorectal cancer( Reference Hartman, Albert and Zhang 18 ), but not in hypercholesterolaemic subjects or patients with peripheral artery disease( Reference Zahradka, Wright and Weighell 19 , Reference Winham and Hutchins 20 ).

Although many clinical trial studies have indicated that intake of soyabean, being a subgroup of legumes, reduces the levels of inflammatory markers( Reference Azadbakht, Kimiagar and Mehrabi 21 , Reference Nasca, Zhou and Welty 22 ), the components of soyabean differ from those of non-soya legumes. The isoflavone and protein contents of soyabean are very high compared with those of non-soya legumes. Furthermore, compared with most non-soya legumes that are very low in fat (generally containing < 5 % of energy), soyabean contains 47 % fat( Reference Messina 23 ). The high content of fibre and complex carbohydrate and the low glycaemic index of non-soya legumes differ from those of soyabeans( Reference Messina 23 ). Thus, while soyabeans are efficacious in the reduction of inflammatory markers, their mode of action may be very distinct from that of non-soya legumes.

Therefore, considering the scarcity and inconsistency of the evidence available for the effect of non-soya legumes on inflammatory markers among diabetic patients, the present study aimed to determine the effect of non-soya legume inclusion in the therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC) diet on inflammatory markers among type 2 diabetic patients.

Materials and methods

Participants

The present randomised cross-over clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of two intervention diets (legume-free TLC diet and non-soya legume-based TLC diet) among type 2 diabetic patients. Of the participants who attended the clinic of Taleghani hospital, Tehran, Iran, during 2012, a total of 157 diabetic patients were screened. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age between 50 and 75 years; having a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (fasting blood glucose concentrations ≥ 7 mmol/l ( ≥ 126 mg/dl) or using oral glucose-lowering medications and having a stabilised status for the past 3 months); being non-smokers; BMI 25–30 kg/m2; not currently receiving insulin therapy; not having any impairments of cardiac, hepatic or renal function. Of the 157 diabetic patients, 115 were excluded due to lacking inclusion criteria (n 61) and refusal to participate (n 54). After exclusion, forty-two patients were eventually assigned to a 2-week run-in period on a usual diet (50 % of energy from carbohydrate, 15 % of energy from protein and 35 % of energy from fat, with restrictions that included no type of legume), with no changes in lifestyle during this period. At the end of the run-in period, two of the participants refused to participate. The remaining forty patients were randomly allocated to intervention groups by an assistant using random sequencing generated in SPSS. Of these remaining participants, half (n 20) were assigned to the legume-free TLC diet and the other half (n 20) to the non-soya legume-based TLC diet. The intervention period was followed by a washout period of 4 weeks, after which the groups followed the alternate treatment for 8 weeks. Of these forty participants, seven dropped out due to poor compliance with the treatment protocol and two other due to change in medications. Therefore, a final group of thirty-one patients completed the two intervention diets( Reference Hosseinpour-Niazi, Mirmiran and Hedayati 24 ). Because the present study was a dietary intervention, the patients and investigators were not blinded. Participants were requested not to change their habitual physical activity levels during the study, and to document their physical activity and 3 d dietary records, including 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day, at baseline and during the intervention for each week, to be reviewed by the study staff for checking dietary compliance and assessing nutrient intakes. The present study was approved by the Research Council and the Ethics Committee of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving patients were approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (identification no. IRCT201202251640N7). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Diets

For each patient, two dietary interventions were prescribed: (1) legume-free TLC diet and (2) non-soya legume-based TLC diet. The legume-free TLC diet included a macronutrient composition of 50–60 % of energy from carbohydrate, 15 % of energy from protein and 25 to 35 % of energy from fat ( < 7 % saturated fat, up to 20 % monounsaturated fat and up to 10 % polyunsaturated fat), as well as intake of < 200 mg cholesterol and 25–30 g fibre. The non-soya legume-based TLC diet was the same as the control diet, except that two servings of red meat were replaced by different types of cooked legumes such as lentils, chickpeas, peas and beans for 3 d per week; half a cup of cooked legumes was considered as one serving of red meat. Patients were not on a weight-reducing diet because weight loss was not the goal of the present study. Laboratory staff were blinded to the treatment status of the participants. For the assessment of dietary compliance, each participant was visited every week for 30 to 45 min at baseline and during the intervention. During each weekly visit, compliance was assessed using the 3 d dietary records. Participants were educated by dietitians on the substitution of red meat by legumes, and advised to reduce SFA and cholesterol intakes and increase fibre intakes. Participants also received education on using an exchange list of foods and preparation of the dietary record. Each participant had to bring his/her 3 d dietary record, including 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day, at each visit. Each food and beverage was then coded according to the prescribed protocol and analysed for the content of energy and the other nutrients using the Nutritionist III software (version 7.0; N-Squared Computing), exclusively designed for Iranian foods. Estimated nutrient intakes from all records collected during the intervention were averaged to determine dietary compliance. In the legume-free TLC diet, mean intakes of energy, protein, fat, SFA, MUFA and carbohydrate were determined from the dietary record and divided by the recommended amounts of these nutrients according to energy requirements of each patient, based on equations suggested by the Institute of Medicine, and Food and Nutrition Board( 25 ). Compliance was found to be >90 %. Moreover, intakes of cholesterol and fibre were adjusted according to the TLC diet ( < 200 mg cholesterol and 25–30 g fibre intake). In the non-soya legume-based TLC diet, in addition to the aforementioned data, intakes of legumes >90 % (of those prescribed) were considered as good compliance.

Measurements

Fasting venous blood samples were taken after an overnight fast of 12–14 h at baseline and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention. On the day of blood collection, serum was separated and frozen at − 70°C for biochemical analysis. Serum hs-CRP concentration (pg/ml) was measured using the ELISA kit (Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.). IL-6 (pg/ml) and TNF-α (pg/ml) concentrations were also measured using the ELISA kit (Diaclone). The intra-assay CV of all assays were < 5 %. The sensitivity of assays for hs-CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α was 0·2 mg/l, 2 pg/ml and 2 pg/ml, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 15.0 (SPSS). Initially, normal distribution of all variables was examined by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For the non-normal distributions of hs-CRP, TNF-α and IL-6, logarithmically transformed values of these variables were used in all analyses, and their geometric means are reported. End point and baseline treatment values were used to calculate the change in each variable. General linear models and paired Student's t tests were used to compare the means of inflammatory markers at the end of the two different dietary intervention periods and the mean change for each variable in the two intervention groups. Statistical significance was defined as P< 0·05.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the participants are summarised in Table 1. Mean age and weight of the participants (77·4 % females) who completed the study were 58·1 (sd 6·0) years and 74·5 (sd 7·0) kg, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics of the patients across the dietary intervention periods. The physical activity level of the legume-free TLC diet group was 2·56 (sd 0·2) metabolic equivalent hours per d and of the non-soya legume-based TLC diet group was 2·49 (sd 0·2) metabolic equivalent hours per d. These levels remained the same across all the study periods. Of the thirty-one participants, twenty-eight used lipid-lowering medications, thirty used blood pressure-lowering medications, and all participants used oral glucose-lowering medications.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants (Mean values and standard deviations)

MET-h, metabolic equivalent hours.

Compared with the legume-free TLC diet group, dietary intakes of total fibre (26·9 (se 1·3) v. 31·4 (se 1·5) g, P= 0·03) and Mg (408 (se 4·2) v. 450 (se 5·4) mg, P= 0·03) increased significantly, whereas dietary intakes of Fe (31·9 (se 1·2) v. 17·2 (se 1·3) mg, P= 0·04) and cholesterol (129 (se 9) v. 169 (se 14) mg, P= 0·04), and glycaemic index (49·8 (se 1·8) v. 42 (se 1·3), P= 0·04) decreased significantly in the non-soya legume-based TLC diet group, as revealed by the analysis of the self-reported 3 d dietary record. No significant differences were observed between the legume-free TLC diet group and the non-soya legume-based TLC diet group in relation to total energy intake (8610 (se 112) v. 8493 (se 104) kJ), percentage of protein (14·6 (se 0·7) v. 13·9 (se 0·5)), percentage of total fat (33·9 (se 0·8) v. 32·5 (se 0·6)), percentage of carbohydrate (52·2 (se 1·7) v. 53·6 (se 1·3)), percentage of SFA (8·4 (se 0·5) v. 7·1 (se 0·5)), percentage of MUFA (17·1 (se 0·9) v. 17·5 (se 0·9)) or percentage of PUFA (8·3 (se 0·4) v. 7·9 (se 0·4)).

The effects of dietary interventions on inflammatory markers are outlined in Table 2. After consumption of both the legume-free TLC diet and the non-soya legume-based TLC diet, hs-CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations decreased significantly from their baseline values. Compared with the legume-free TLC diet, the non-soya legume-based TLC diet significantly decreased the concentrations of hs-CRP ( − 1·3 (se 1·1) v. − 1·7 (se 1·2), P= 0·019), IL-6 ( − 1·2 (se 1·0) v. − 1·6 (se 1·1), P= 0·018) and TNF-α ( − 1·3 (se 1·1) v. − 1·8 (se 1·1), P= 0·018). The weight of the participants did not change significantly after consumption of either the legume-free TLC diet or the non-soya legume-based TLC diet.

Table 2 Concentrations of the inflammatory markers at baseline and after 8 weeks of dietary interventions in type 2 diabetic patients (Mean values and standard errors)

TLC, therapeutic lifestyle changes; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Mean value was significantly different from that at baseline: * P< 0·05, ** P< 0·001 (paired Student's t test).

The control diet was the legume-free TLC diet. The non-soya legume-based TLC diet was the same as the control diet, except that two servings of red meat were replaced with different cooked legumes such as lentils, chickpeas, peas and beans over a period of 3 d per week. End point and baseline treatment values were used to calculate the change in each variable.

Discussion

In the present study, we observed that an 8-week non-soya legume-based TLC diet intervention had favourable effects on inflammatory markers that were associated with type 2 diabetes. This may be explained in part by the comparison of nutrient contents between the two diets: for example, the non-soya legume-based TLC diet had a higher concentration of Mg and fibre, known to be associated with decreased concentrations of inflammatory markers( Reference Song, Li and van Dam 5 , Reference Nilsson, Johansson and Ekström 8 ). In a cross-sectional study, two dietary patterns, one high in Mg and the other (Western dietary pattern) low in Mg, have been reported to be inversely and positively associated with increased inflammatory marker levels and endothelial dysfunction, respectively( Reference Lopez-Garcia, Schulze and Fung 15 ). A high intake of Mg has been reported to be associated with lower concentrations of markers of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction( Reference Chacko, Song and Nathan 9 ), possibly through the down-regulation of genes related to metabolic and inflammatory pathways including C1q and TNF-related protein 9, and pro-platelet basic protein( Reference Chacko, Sul and Song 10 ). Dietary fibre reduces inflammation by decreasing lipid oxidation and hyperglycaemia, which, in turn, are associated with decreased inflammation. Normal bowel flora also contribute to a healthy intestinal environment achieved by dietary fibre intakes, which help to prevent inflammation( Reference King 26 ). Sources of protein intake (i.e. animal or plant) may have different effects on inflammatory markers. In the present study, substitution of animal protein with plant protein may be another component of non-soya legume-based TLC diet that may reduce inflammation. The present result is consistent with that of a previous study demonstrating that substitution of one serving of total red meat intake with an alternative protein food source (e.g. poultry, fish, legumes or nuts) is associated with lower concentrations of C-reactive protein, ferritin, glycosylated Hb and fasting insulin( Reference Ley, Sun and Willett 27 ). In a prospective study, during an 8-year follow-up, vegetable protein consumption has been shown to be inversely associated with endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, whereas no association has been observed between animal protein consumption and these markers( Reference van Bussel, Soedamah-Muthu and Henry 28 ). Moreover, less intake of vegetable protein has been associated with an increase in TNF-α and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 concentrations( Reference van Bussel, Soedamah-Muthu and Henry 28 ). In addition, in a clinical trial study, after 8 weeks of dietary intervention, higher intakes of animal and meat protein have been reported to be positively associated with inflammatory score based on CRP, IL-6, TNF-α and plasminogen activator concentrations, whereas no association has been found between vegetable protein intake and inflammation in obese individuals with metabolic syndrome symptoms( Reference Lopez-Legarrea, de la Iglesia and Abete 29 ). The mechanisms of the effects of animal and plant protein intakes on inflammatory markers have not been elucidated; however, these effects may be mediated through obesity( Reference Berg and Scherer 30 ). Obesity increases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from adipose tissue, and these cytokines induce hepatic production of CRP and other acute-phase proteins( Reference Montonen, Boeing and Fritsche 31 ). However, much remains to be learned about the underlying mechanisms that mediate the multiple effects reported to date. Moreover, lower intakes of cholesterol( Reference Kleemann, Verschuren and van Erk 32 ) and Fe( Reference Wessling-Resnick 33 ) from the non-soya legume-based TLC diet might in part explain these associations.

Cross-sectional and prospective studies have found that consumption of legumes and legume-based diets is inversely associated with type 2 diabetes( Reference Villegas, Gao and Yang 34 , Reference Venn and Mann 35 ). The biological mechanisms underlying these relationships are not entirely understood. One possible mechanism by which legumes has been reported to influence diabetes and it complications is the modulation of inflammation. Serum hs-CRP, an acute-phase protein and a sensitive marker of subclinical inflammation, has been found to be associated with impaired glucose homeostasis, β-cell dysfunction and development of insulin resistance, and therefore diabetes( Reference Nyström 36 Reference Yuan, Zhou and Tang 38 ). Recent trials have found that adherence to a legume-enriched diet lead to the improvement of the biomarkers of inflammation( Reference Zhang, Monk and Lu 6 ). In an animal model with acute colitis, a high-bean diet has been shown to reduce the mRNA expression of colonic inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-9, interferon-γ and IL-17A), and increase anti-inflammatory IL-10( Reference Zhang, Monk and Lu 6 ). In a cross-over trial, reductions in hs-CRP and soluble TNF-α receptor I levels have been reported among men at risk for colorectal cancer following consumption of a low glycaemic index and a high-legume diet( Reference Hartman, Albert and Zhang 18 ). Adherence to energy-restricted, legume-based diets (four servings/week) for 8 weeks has been shown to result in a significant reduction of hs-CRP, but not IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations, compared with an energy-restricted, legume-free diet among obese participants( Reference Hermsdorff, Zulet and Abete 17 ). In addition, inclusion of barley kernels and brown beans in meals has been shown to decrease inflammatory markers, such as IL-6, by − 17 and − 35 %, respectively( Reference Nilsson, Johansson and Ekström 8 , Reference Nilsson, Ostman and Holst 39 ). Moreover, in a cross-sectional study, plasma concentrations of hs-CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 have been reported to be decreased across increasing quintiles of dietary legumes among healthy women( Reference Esmaillzadeh and Azadbakht 40 ). In contrast, in a clinical trial study, daily consumption of half a cup of cooked legumes (beans, peas, lentils and chickpeas) for 8 weeks has not been shown to change serum markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation among twenty-six individuals with peripheral artery disease( Reference Zahradka, Wright and Weighell 19 ). In another study, daily intake of half a cup of baked beans has not been reported to change hs-CRP concentrations among hypercholesterolaemic patients after 8 weeks( Reference Winham and Hutchins 20 ).

Compared with previous studies investigating the effect of legumes in the framework of an energy-restricted diet, the present study found that in an isoenergetic TLC diet, replacement of two servings of red meat with legumes for a period of 3 d per week had beneficial effects on the biomarkers of inflammation in overweight diabetic patients, independent of weight change. The underlying mechanisms by which legume consumption might affect inflammation are not entirely clearly documented. Legumes contain non-digestible fermentable components (SCFA precursors), high fibre such as phytic acid (a major fibre-associated component of legumes), Mg and phenolic compounds (phenolic acids, flavonoids and anthocyanins), all with documented anti-inflammatory potentials( Reference Weglarz, Wawszczyk and Orchel 4 Reference Nilsson, Johansson and Ekström 8 ). Dietary polyphenols have been found to inhibit cellular enzymes, such as phospholipase A2, cyclo-oxygenase and lipoxygenase, in order to reduce the production of arachidonic acid, PG and leukotrienes, thus exerting an important anti-inflammatory action( Reference Santangelo, Varì and Scazzocchio 41 ). Dietary polyphenols also inhibit NF-κB signalling and the down-regulation of the expression of pro-inflammatory markers( Reference González, Ballester and López-Posadas 11 ). In addition, the beneficial effects of legumes on inflammatory biomarkers might be explained by the low-glycaemic index values of legumes( Reference Qi and Hu 42 ). A high dietary glycaemic index increased the pro-inflammatory process through hyperglycaemia, hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance( Reference Liu, Manson and Buring 13 ). Hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia induced by foods with a high-glycaemic index may lead to the production of advanced glycation end products, which may stimulate the liver to increase the production of acute-phase reactants( Reference Liu, Manson and Buring 13 ).

Our previous investigation has found that compared with the legume-free TLC diet, consumption of the non-soya legume-based TLC diet significantly decreased cardiometabolic risk factors such as fasting blood glucose ( − 19·5 v. − 28·7, P< 0·001), fasting insulin ( − 1·5 v. − 3·5, P= 0·006), TAG ( − 19·5 v. − 38·5, P= 0·02) and LDL-cholesterol ( − 8·7 v. − 15·6, P= 0·02) concentrations( Reference Hosseinpour-Niazi, Mirmiran and Hedayati 24 ). In the present study, a reduction in the inflammatory markers, which was independent of weight change, could have been due to a reduction in the aforementioned cardiometabolic risk factors. Hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance have been known to be involved in the exacerbation of inflammatory status through the up-regulation of their genesis( Reference Eiselein, Wilson and Lamé 43 Reference Festa, D'Agostino and Howard 48 ).

As regards the limitations of the study, one limitation was that the intervention diets were based on specific dietary recommendations, and pre-prepared diets were not given to the participants; thus, the diets may not have been followed as carefully as in trials where prepared food is provided. In addition, the biochemical index of legume intakes was not measured due to limited funds; however, our findings show that compliance with the non-soya legume-based TLC diet has benefits on inflammatory markers. The non-blinding of patients and investigators due to the nature of the trial (dietary intervention) is another limitation of the present study. Although the rate of non-compliance was also a limitation, with about one-quarter of diabetic patients being lost to follow-up, considering that it was a cross-over trial carried out over a long period of time, a greater number of patient exclusion is common.

Conclusion

Replacement of two servings of red meat with non-soya legumes in the isoenergetic TLC diet for a period of 3 d per week reduced plasma concentrations of hs-CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α among overweight diabetic patients, independent of weight change.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants who took part in the present study. The authors appreciate Ms N. Shiva for critical editing of English grammar and syntax of the manuscript.

The present study was supported by the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (grant no. 411).

The authors' contributions are as follows: S. H.-N. conceived the study; P. M., S. H.-N. and F. A. designed the study; S. H.-N. and A. F.-G. analysed and interpreted the data; S. H.-N., A. F.-G. and P. M. prepared the manuscript; F. A. supervised the project and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1 King, GL (2008) The role of inflammatory cytokines in diabetes and its complications. J Periodontol 79, 15271534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Goldberg, RB (2009) Cytokine and cytokine-like inflammation markers, endothelial dysfunction, and imbalanced coagulation in development of diabetes and its complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94, 31713182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Spranger, J, Kroke, A, Möhlig, M, et al. (2003) Inflammatory cytokines and the risk to develop type 2 diabetes: results of the prospective population-based European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. Diabetes 52, 812817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Weglarz, L, Wawszczyk, J, Orchel, A, et al. (2007) Phytic acid modulates in vitro IL-8 and IL-6 release from colonic epithelial cells stimulated with LPS and IL-1β. Dig Dis Sci 52, 93102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Song, Y, Li, TY, van Dam, RM, et al. (2007) Magnesium intake and plasma concentrations of markers of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in women. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 10681074.Google ScholarPubMed
6 Zhang, C, Monk, JM, Lu, JT, et al. (2014) Cooked navy and black bean diets improve biomarkers of colon health and reduce inflammation during colitis. Br J Nutr 13, 115.Google Scholar
7 Sergent, T, Piront, N, Meurice, J, et al. (2010) Anti-inflammatory effects of dietary phenolic compounds in an in vitro model of inflamed human intestinal epithelium. Chem Biol Interact 188, 659667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Nilsson, A, Johansson, E, Ekström, L, et al. (2013) Effects of a brown beans evening meal on metabolic risk markers and appetite regulating hormones at a subsequent standardized breakfast: a randomized cross-over study. PLOS ONE 8, e59985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Chacko, SA, Song, Y, Nathan, L, et al. (2010) Relations of dietary magnesium intake to biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in an ethnically diverse cohort of postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care 33, 304310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Chacko, SA, Sul, J, Song, Y, et al. (2011) Magnesium supplementation, metabolic and inflammatory markers, and global genomic and proteomic profiling: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover trial in overweight individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 93, 463473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 González, R, Ballester, I, López-Posadas, R, et al. (2011) Effects of flavonoids and other polyphenols on inflammation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 51, 331362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Griffith, JA, Ma, Y, Chasan-Taber, L, et al. (2008) Association between dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Nutrition 24, 401406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Liu, S, Manson, JE, Buring, JE, et al. (2002) Relation between a diet with a high glycemic load and plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 75, 492498.Google ScholarPubMed
14 Bouchenak, M & Lamri-Senhadji, M (2013) Nutritional quality of legumes, and their role in cardiometabolic risk prevention: a review. J Med Food 16, 185198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Lopez-Garcia, E, Schulze, MB, Fung, TT, et al. (2004) Major dietary patterns are related to plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 10291035.Google ScholarPubMed
16 Esmaillzadeh, A, Kimiagar, M, Mehrabi, Y, et al. (2007) Dietary patterns and markers of systemic inflammation among Iranian women. J Nutr 137, 992998.Google ScholarPubMed
17 Hermsdorff, HH, Zulet, MA, Abete, I, et al. (2011) A legume-based hypocaloric diet reduces proinflammatory status and improves metabolic features in overweight/obese subjects. Eur J Nutr 50, 6169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Hartman, TJ, Albert, PS, Zhang, Z, et al. (2010) Consumption of a legume-enriched, low-glycemic index diet is associated with biomarkers of insulin resistance and inflammation among men at risk for colorectal cancer. J Nutr 146, 6067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Zahradka, P, Wright, B, Weighell, W, et al. (2013) Daily non-soy legume consumption reverses vascular impairment due to peripheral artery disease. Atherosclerosis 230, 310314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Winham, DM & Hutchins, AM (2007) Baked bean consumption reduces serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic adults. Nutr Res 27, 380386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Azadbakht, L, Kimiagar, M, Mehrabi, Y, et al. (2007) Soy consumption, markers of inflammation, and endothelial function: a cross-over study in postmenopausal women with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 30, 967973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Nasca, MM, Zhou, JR & Welty, FK (2008) Effect of soy nuts on adhesion molecules and markers of inflammation in hypertensive and normotensive postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol 102, 8486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Messina, MJ (1999) Legumes and soybeans: overview of their nutritional profiles and health effects. Am J Clin Nutr 70, 439S450S.Google ScholarPubMed
24 Hosseinpour-Niazi, S, Mirmiran, P, Hedayati, M, et al. (2014) Substitution of red meat with legumes in the therapeutic lifestyle change diet based on dietary advice improves cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight type 2 diabetes patients: a cross-over randomized clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr (In the Press) .Google ScholarPubMed
25 Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Food and Nutrition Board (2005) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids, pp. 107264. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google ScholarPubMed
26 King, DE (2005) Dietary fiber, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. Mol Nutr Food Res 49, 594600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Ley, SH, Sun, Q, Willett, WC, et al. (2014) Associations between red meat intake and biomarkers of inflammation and glucose metabolism in women. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 352360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 van Bussel, BC, Soedamah-Muthu, SS, Henry, RM, et al. (2013) Unhealthy dietary patterns associated with inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in type 1 diabetes: the EURODIAB study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 23, 758764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Lopez-Legarrea, P, de la Iglesia, R, Abete, I, et al. (2014) The protein type within a hypocaloric diet affects obesity-related inflammation: the RESMENA project. Nutrition 30, 424429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Berg, AH & Scherer, PE (2005) Adipose tissue, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 96, 939949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Montonen, J, Boeing, H, Fritsche, A, et al. (2013) Consumption of red meat and whole-grain bread in relation to biomarkers of obesity, inflammation, glucose metabolism and oxidative stress. Eur J Nutr 52, 337345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Kleemann, R, Verschuren, L, van Erk, MJ, et al. (2007) Atherosclerosis and liver inflammation induced by increased dietary cholesterol intake: a combined transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis. Genome Biol 8, R200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Wessling-Resnick, M (2010) Iron homeostasis and the inflammatory response. Annu Rev Nutr 30, 105122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Villegas, R, Gao, YT, Yang, G, et al. (2008) Legume and soy food intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Shanghai Women's Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 162167.Google ScholarPubMed
35 Venn, BJ & Mann, JI (2004) Cereal grains, legumes and diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 14431461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Nyström, T (2007) C-reactive protein: a marker or a player? Clin Sci (Lond) 113, 7981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Pfützner, A & Forst, T (2006) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein as cardiovascular risk marker in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 8, 2836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Yuan, G, Zhou, L, Tang, J, et al. (2006) Serum CRP levels are equally elevated in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance and related to adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 72, 244250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 Nilsson, AC, Ostman, EM, Holst, JJ, et al. (2008) Including indigestible carbohydrates in the evening meal of healthy subjects improves glucose tolerance, lowers inflammatory markers, and increases satiety after a subsequent standardized breakfast. J Nutr 138, 732739.Google ScholarPubMed
40 Esmaillzadeh, A & Azadbakht, L (2012) Legume consumption is inversely associated with serum concentrations of adhesion molecules and inflammatory biomarkers among Iranian women. J Nutr 142, 334339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Santangelo, C, Varì, R, Scazzocchio, B, et al. (2007) Polyphenols, intracellular signalling and inflammation. Ann Ist Super Sanita 43, 394405.Google ScholarPubMed
42 Qi, L & Hu, FB (2007) Dietary glycemic load, whole grains, and systemic inflammation in diabetes: the epidemiological evidence. Curr Opin Lipidol 18, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Eiselein, L, Wilson, DW, Lamé, MW, et al. (2007) Lipolysis products from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins increase endothelial permeability, perturb zonula occludens-1 and F-actin, and induce apoptosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292, H2745H2753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44 Esposito, K, Nappo, F, Marfella, R, et al. (2002) Inflammatory cytokine concentrations are acutely increased by hyperglycemia in humans: role of oxidative stress. Circulation 106, 20672072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45 Holvoet, P, Vanhaecke, J, Janssens, S, et al. (1998) Oxidized LDL and malondialdehyde-modified LDL in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. Circulation 98, 14871494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46 Hulthe, J & Fagerberg, B (2002) Circulating oxidized LDL is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis development and inflammatory cytokines (AIR Study). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22, 11621167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Berliner, JA, Navab, M, Fogelman, AM, et al. (1995) Atherosclerosis: basic mechanisms. Oxidation, inflammation, and genetics. Circulation 91, 24882496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48 Festa, A, D'Agostino, R Jr, Howard, G, et al. (2000) Chronic subclinical inflammation as part of the insulin resistance syndrome: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Circulation 102, 4247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 1

Table 2 Concentrations of the inflammatory markers at baseline and after 8 weeks of dietary interventions in type 2 diabetic patients† (Mean values and standard errors)

You have Access
24
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Non-soya legume-based therapeutic lifestyle change diet reduces inflammatory status in diabetic patients: a randomised cross-over clinical trial
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Non-soya legume-based therapeutic lifestyle change diet reduces inflammatory status in diabetic patients: a randomised cross-over clinical trial
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Non-soya legume-based therapeutic lifestyle change diet reduces inflammatory status in diabetic patients: a randomised cross-over clinical trial
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *