Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-6zkrn Total loading time: 0.595 Render date: 2023-02-06T07:34:25.980Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-expression Values on Political Regime Type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2015

Abstract

The notion that cultural characteristics influence political regimes remains popular, despite mixed supporting evidence. In particular, democracy is argued to emerge and thrive in countries where liberal or freedom-oriented values (so-called self-expression values) are widespread. Inglehart and Welzel, for instance, report such an effect, mainly drawing inferences from cross-country comparisons. Yet cross-country correlations between self-expression values and democracy could stem from different processes. Reinvestigating this relationship, this article finds no empirical support when employing models accounting for sample-selection bias, country-specific effects and the endogeneity of values to democracy. Self-expression values do not enhance democracy levels or democratization chances, and neither do they stabilize existing democracies. In contrast, this study finds indications that a country’s experience with democracy enhances self-expression values.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, University of Oslo (emails: s.a.dahlum@stv.uio.no; c.h.knutsen@stv.uio.no). We thank Tore Wig, Håvard Mokleiv Nygård and anonymous reviewers, as well as the discussants and participants at the 2013 ISA Annual Conference in San Franciso, the 2013 Annual EPSA Meeting in Barcelona, the Democracies Today: Constitutions, Cultures, Practices Workshop at CSMN, UiO, and at the CSCW, PRIO brownbag seminar for very valuable comments and suggestions. We also thank Jørn Wichne Pedersen and Øyvind Solheim for excellent assistance. Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123415000447.

References

Abdollahian, Mark A., Coan, Travis G., Oh, Hana, and Yesilada, Birol A.. 2012. Dynamics of Cultural Change: The Human Development Perspective. International Studies Quarterly 56 (4):827842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A.. 2001. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review 91 (5):13691401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A., and Yared, Pierre. 2005. From Education to Democracy. American Economic Review 95 (2):4449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A., and Yared, Pierre. 2008. Income and Democracy. American Economic Review 98 (3):808842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswick, Else, Levinson, Daniel, and Nevitt Sanford, R.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2):155194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Amy C., Inglehart, Ronal, and Welzel, Christian. 2012. Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense. International Political Science Review 33 (1):4162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, Gal, and Davidov, Eldad. 2011. Assessment of Measurement Equivalence with Cross-National and Longitudinal Surveys in Political Science. European Political Science 11 (3):363377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslaksen, Silje. 2010. Oil and Democracy: More Than a Cross-Country Correlation? Journal of Peace Research 47 (4):111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review 89 (3):634647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2001. Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon. International Organization 55 (2):487495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasius, Jörg, and Thiessen, Victor. 2012. Assessing the Quality of Survey Data. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, Richard, and Bond, Stephen R.. 1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1):115143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2012. Where to Draw the Line? From Degree to Dichotomy in Measures of Democracy. Democratization 19 (4):690712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2003. Endogenous Democratization. World Politics 55 (4):517549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Smith, Alastair. 2009. Political Survival and Endogenous Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies 42 (2):167197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Downs, George W.. 2005. Development and Democracy. Foreign Affairs 84:7786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, Ross E., and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 1994. Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis. American Political Science Review 88 (4):903910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelló-Climent, Amparo. 2008. On the Distribution of Education and Democracy. Journal of Development Economics 87 (2):179190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James R.. 2010. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice 143 (1–2):67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2008. The Spirit of Democracy. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Fails, Matthew D., and Pierce, Heather N.. 2010. Changing Mass Attitudes and Democratic Deepening. Political Research Quarterly 63 (1):174187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Smith, Amy E.. 2011. Civic Education, Political Discussion, and the Social Transmission of Democratic Knowledge and Values in a New Democracy: Kenya 2002. American Journal of Political Science 55 (2):417435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francisco, Ronald A. 2005. The Dictator’s Dilemma. In Repression and Mobilization, edited by Christian Davenport, Hank Johnston and Carol Mueller, 5884. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassebner, Martin, Lamla, Michael J., and Vreeland, James R.. 2012. Extreme Bounds of Democracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (2):171197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, Bond, Philip, Barndt, William T., and Moreno, Carola. 2005. Democracy and Economic Growth: A Historical Perspective. World Politics 57 (3):323364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D.. 2006. The Diffusion of Democracy and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization 60 (4):911933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadenius, Axel, and Teorell, Jan. 2005. Cultural and Economic Prerequisites of Democracy: Reassessing Recent Evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development 39 (4):87106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heid, Benedikt, Langer, Julian, and Larch, Mario. 2012. Income and Democracy: Evidence from System GMM Estimates. Economic Letters 116 (2):166169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honaker, James, and King, Gary. 2010. What to Do About Missing Values in Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):561581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, Christian. 2009. Inequality and Democracy: Why Inequality Harms Consolidation but Does Not Affect Democratization. World Politics 61 (4):589622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1997. The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W., and Miller, Ross A.. 1996. A Renaissance of Political Culture? American Journal of Political Science 40 (3):632659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Ryan. 2010. The Contradiction of Modernization: A Conditional Model of Endogenous Democratization. Journal of Politics 72 (3):785798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, Carl H. 2010. Measuring Effective Democracy. International Political Science Review 31 (2):109128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, Carl H. 2011. Democracy, Dictatorship and Protection of Property Rights. Journal of Development Studies 47 (1):164182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989. World Politics 44 (1):748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2006. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (1):69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinov, Nikolay, and Goemans, Hein. 2014. Coups and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science 44 (4):799825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslow, Abraham. 1988 [1954]. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 2001. What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies. Comparative Political Studies 34 (1):3062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 2007. Generation, Age, and Time: The Dynamics of Political Learning During Russia’s Transformation. American Journal of Political Science 51 (4):822834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 1994. Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships. American Political Science Review 88 (3):635652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1):534.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Political Activism Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2009. Democracy Time-Series Dataset, release 3.0, January 2009.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 2002. Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship. American Sociological Review 67 (2):254277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Rohrschneider, Robert. 2003. Democratization and Political Tolerance in Seventeen Countries: A Multi-Level Model of Democratic Learning. Political Research Quarterly 56 (3):243257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. Modernization: Theory and Facts. World Politics 49 (2):155183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, Lingling, and Shin, Doh Chull. 2011. How Mass Political Attitudes Affect Democratization: Exploring the Facilitating Role Critical Democrats Play in the Process. International Political Science Review 32 (3):246262.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1994. Report from the Laboratory: The Influence of Institutions on Political Elites’ Democratic Values in Germany. American Political Science Review 88 (4):927941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roodman, David. 2009. A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71 (1):135158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. Transitions to Democracy. Towards a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics 2:337363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salame, Ghassan, ed. Democracy Without Democrats: The Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World. New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2002. The Renaissance of Political Culture or the Renaissance of the Ecological Fallacy. Comparative Politics 34:273292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. 1975. Personality and Democratic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan. 2010. Determinants of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan, and Hadenius, Axel. 2006. Democracy Without Democratic Values: A Rejoinder to Welzel and Inglehart. Studies in Comparative International Development 41 (3):95111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thyne, Clayton L., and Powell, Jonathan M.. 2015. Coup d’état or Coup d’Autocracy? How Coups Impact Democratization, 1950–2008. Foreign Policy Analysis (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1955 [1835]. The Old Regime and the French Revolution. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E., ed. 1999. Democracy & Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian. 2006. Democratization as an Emancipative Process: The Neglected Role of Mass Motivations. European Journal of Political Research 45 (6):871896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian. 2007. Are Levels of Democracy Affected by Mass Attitudes? Testing Attainment and Sustainment Effects on Democracy. International Political Science Review 28 (4):397424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2006. Emancipative Values and Democracy: Response to Hadenius and Teorell. Studies in Comparative International Development 41 (3):7494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2008. The Role of Ordinary People in Democratization. Journal of Democracy 19 (1):126140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 2003. The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. European Journal of Political Research 42 (3):341379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wucherpfennig, Julian, and Deutsch, Franziska. 2009. Modernization and Democracy: Theories and Evidence Revisited. Living Reviews in Democracy 1. Available from http://www.livingreviews.org/lrd-2009-4, accessed March 2013.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Dahlum and Knutsen supplementary material

Appendix

Download Dahlum and Knutsen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 3 MB
17
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-expression Values on Political Regime Type
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-expression Values on Political Regime Type
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Democracy by Demand? Reinvestigating the Effect of Self-expression Values on Political Regime Type
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *