Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-8sgpw Total loading time: 0.457 Render date: 2021-02-25T19:36:07.657Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Easing the Heavy Hand: Humanitarian Concern, Empathy, and Opinion on Immigration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2013

Abstract

The bulk of the public opinion research on immigration identifies the factors leading to opposition to immigration. In contrast, we focus on a previously unexplored factor yielding support for immigration: humanitarianism. Relying upon secondary analysis of national public opinion survey data and an original survey experiment, we demonstrate that humanitarian concern significantly decreases support for restrictive immigration policy. Results from our survey experiment demonstrate that in an information environment evoking both threat and countervailing humanitarian concern regarding immigration, the latter can and does override the former. Last, our results point to the importance of individual differences in empathy in moderating the effects of both threat and humanitarian inducements.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Newman: Department of Political Science, University of Connecticut; Hartman: Department of Government & Justice Studies, Appalachian State University; Lown and Feldman: Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University (emails benj.newman@uconn.edu, hartmantk@appstate.edu, patrick.lown@stonybrook.edu, stanley.feldman@stonybrook.edu). An online appendix with supplementary materials is available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123413000410.

References

Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2011. The Evolution and Diagnosis of Empathy. Evolutionary Review 2:5557.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon Wheelwright, Sally. 2004. The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34:163175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, C. Daniel. 1998. Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. Pp. 282316 in Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th Edition, Volume 2, edited by Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske and Gardner Lindzey. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Batson, C. Daniel, Chang, Johee, Orr, Ryan Rowland, Jennifer. 2002. Empathy, Attitudes, and Action: Can Feeling for a Member of a Stigmatized Group Motivate One to Help the Group? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 28:16561666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas A. Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science 52:959978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Peter Gimpel, James G.. 2000. Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy. Political Science Quarterly 1152:201225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise, Wong, Cara Citrin, Jack. 2006. Racial Threat, Partisan Climate, and Direct Democracy: Contextual Effects in Three California Initiatives. Political Behavior 282:129150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, Leo Ralph. 2008. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis Druckman, James N.. 2007. Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review 101:637655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Reingold, Beth Green, Donald P.. 1990. American Identity and the Politics of Ethnic Change. Journal of Politics 52:11241154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack., Reingold, Beth., Walters, Evelyn. Green, Donald P.. 1990. The ‘Official English’ Movement and the Symbolic Politics of Language in the United States. Western Political Quarterly 433:535559.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack., Green, Donald P., Muste, Christopher Wong, Cara. 1997. Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations. Journal of Politics 59:858881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. Rosenblum, Marc R.. 2005. Immigration and Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 8:99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela Saunders, Elizabeth N.. 2006. A New Electorate? Comparing Preferences and Partisanship between Immigrants and Natives. American Journal of Political Science 50 (4):962981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinan, Stephan. 2010. Debate on Haitian Refugees Status Begins, Washington Times. Available from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/15/disaster-sets-off-debate-on-haitian-status-in-us/?page=all. Accessed 10 August 2012.Google Scholar
Dixon, Jeffrey C. Rosenbaum, Michael S.. 2004. Nice to Know You? Testing Contact, Cultural, and Group Threat Theories of Anti-Black and Anti-Hispanic Stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly 85:257280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dymond, R. 1949. A Scale for the Measurement of Empathic Ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology 13:127133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espenshade, Thomas J. Calhoun, Charles A.. 1993. An Analysis of Public Opinion Toward Undocumented Immigration. Population Research and Policy Review 123:189224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values. American Journal of Political Science 31:416440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1999. Economic Values and Inequality. Pp. 159202 in Measures of Political Attitudes, edited by John P. Robinson, Phillip R. Shaver and Lawrence S. Wrightsman. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley Zaller, John. 1992. The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State. American Journal of Political Science 36:268307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2001. The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare. American Journal of Political Science 45:658677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S. 2000. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, Carmen. 2010. Earthquake Leads US to Relax Policy on Haitian Refugees, Time. Available from http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953379_1953494_1954262,00.html. Accessed 10 August 2012.Google Scholar
Guimond, Serge, De Oliveira, Pierre, Kamiesjki, Rodolphe Sidanius, Jim. 2010. The Trouble with Assimilation: Social Dominance and the Emergence of Hostility Against Immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 34:642650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jesn, Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2014. Public Attitudes toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science [Vol. 17, forthcoming].Google Scholar
Haubert, Jeannie Fussell, Elizabeth. 2006. Explaining Pro-Immigrant Sentiment in the US: Social Class, Cosmopolitanism, and Perceptions of Immigrants. International Migration Review 40:489507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M.V. Morris, Irwin L.. 1997. Amigo o Enemigo? Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration. Social Science Quarterly 782:78137819.Google Scholar
Hood, M.V. Morris, Irwin L.. 2000. Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? Racial/Ethnic Context and the Anglo Vote on Proposition 187. Social Science Quarterly 81:194206.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition. American Political Science Review 104:4060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie Sears, David O.. 1995. Opposition to Bilingual Education: Prejudice or the Defense of Realistic Interests? Social Psychology Quarterly 58 (2):133143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Jones, Jeffrey M. Chard, Richard E.. 2001. Compassionate Politics: Support for Old-Age Programs among the Non-Elderly. Political Psychology 22 (3):443471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto Kinder, D.R.. 1987. News that Matters: Agenda-Setting and Priming in a Television Age. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 347361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluegel, James R. Smith, Elliot R.. 1986. Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. Piscataway, N.J.: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Lipsey, Mark W. 1990. Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Malka, Ariel, Soto, Christopher J., Cohen, Adam B. Miller, Dale T.. 2011. Religiosity and Social Welfare: Competing Influences of Cultural Conservatism and Prosocial Value Orientation. Journal of Personality 79 (4):763792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCloskey, Herbert Zaller, John. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Democracy and Capitalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert Epstein, Norman. 1972. A Measure of Emotional Empathy. Journal of Personality 40:525543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, Benjamin J., Hartman, Todd K. Taber, Charles S.. 2012. Foreign Language Exposure, Cultural Threat, and Opposition to Immigration. Political Psychology 33 (5):635657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nteta, Tatishe M. 2013. United We Stand? African Americans, Self Interest, and Immigration Reform. American Politics Research 41 (1):147172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, Sabrina J. Huo, Yuen J.. 2007. The Role of Moral Emotions in Predicting Support for Political Actions in Post-War Iraq. Political Psychology 28:227255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passel, Jeffrey S. Fix, Michael. 1994. Myths About Immigrants. Foreign Policy 95:151160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Michael B., Slothuus, Rune, Stubager, Rune Togeby, Lisa. 2010. Deservingness Versus Values in Public Opinion on Welfare: The Automaticity of the Deservingness Heuristic. European Journal of Political Research 50:2452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quillian, Lincoln. 1995. Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review 60:586611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, Rene R. Espino, Rodolfo. 2009. Racial Threat, Residential Segregation, and the Policy Attitudes of Anglos. Political Research Quarterly 62:415426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John Citrin, Jack. 2007. European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests, and Information. British Journal of Political Science 37:477504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul, Hagendoorn, Louk Prior, Marcus. 2004. Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. American Political Science Review 981:3549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. Theriault, Sean M.. 2004. The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. Pp. 133165 in Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, ed. William Saris and Paul Sniderman. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Staub, Ervin. 1989. Individual and Societal (Group) Values in a Motivational Perspective and Their Role in Benevolence and Harmdoing. Pp. 4561 in Social and Moral Values: Individual and Societal Perspectives, ed. Nancy Eisenberg, Janusz Reykowski, and Ervin Staub. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R. 1996. Compassion and American Public Opinion: An Analysis of the NES Humanitarianism Scale. NES Pilot Study Report.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M., Shirley Post, Stephanie Rinden, Allison L.. 2000. Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes. Political Research Quarterly 53:285303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, Walter G., Renfro, C. Lausanne, Esses, Victoria M., Stephan, Cookie White Martin, Tim. 2005. The Effects of Feeling Threatened on Attitudes toward Immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, Walter G., Ybarra, Oscar Bachman, Guy. 1999. Prejudice Toward Immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2911:22212237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stotland, E. 1969. Exploratory Investigations of Empathy. Pp. 271314 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 4, edited by L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Stanford E. 1965. Eye Movements in Reading: Facts and Fallacies. American Educational Research Journal 4:187202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Lotte, Green, Eva G.T. Sidanius, Jim. 2008. We Will Hunt Them Down: How Social Dominance and Right-Wing Authoritarianism Fuel Ethnic Persecution of Immigrants in Fundamentally Different Ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44:14551464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J. Grummel, John A.. 2003. Revisiting the Racial Threat Hypothesis: White Voter Support for California's Proposition 209. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3:183202.Google Scholar
Van Laar, Colette, Levin, Shana, Sinclair, Stacey Sidanius, Jim. 2005. The Effect of University Roommate Contact on Ethnic Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41:329345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, Akio, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Wheelwright, Sally, Goldenfeld, Nigel, Delaney, Joe, Fine, Debra, Smith, Richard Weil, Leonora. 2006. Development of Short Forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences 41:929940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, Paul, Ventura, Elbert, Savillo, Robert, Lin, Susan, Lewis, Greg. 2008. Fear and Loathing in Prime Time: Immigration Myths and Cable News. Media Matters Action Network Report. http://mediamattersaction.org/reports/fearandloathing/online_version. Accessed: August 28, 2012.Google Scholar

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Appendix

File 104 KB

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Data

File 333 Bytes

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

File 7 MB

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Data

File 204 Bytes

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

File 2 MB

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Data

File 225 Bytes

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

File 359 KB

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Data

File 417 Bytes

Newman et al. Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

File 145 KB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 83
Total number of PDF views: 631 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Easing the Heavy Hand: Humanitarian Concern, Empathy, and Opinion on Immigration
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Easing the Heavy Hand: Humanitarian Concern, Empathy, and Opinion on Immigration
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Easing the Heavy Hand: Humanitarian Concern, Empathy, and Opinion on Immigration
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *