Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-zts5g Total loading time: 0.29 Render date: 2021-10-22T07:35:23.280Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Labor Union Strength and the Equality of Political Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2016

Abstract

Amid growing evidence of ‘unequal democracy’ in the United States, labor unions can play a potentially important role by ensuring that low-income citizens’ opinions receive more equal consideration when elected officials make policy decisions. To investigate this possibility, this article evaluates the relationship between labor union strength and representational equality across states and finds evidence that states with higher levels of union membership weigh citizens’ opinions more equally in the policy-making process. In contrast, there is no relationship between the volume of labor union contributions to political campaigns in a state and the equality of its political representation. These findings suggest that labor unions promote greater political equality primarily by mobilizing their working-class members to political action and, more broadly, underscore the important role that organized labor continues to play in shaping the distribution of political power across American society.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, Baylor University (email: patrick_j_flavin@baylor.edu). A previous version of this article was presented at the 2016 meeting of the Southern Political Science Association in San Juan, Puerto Rico. I thank Nicholas Carnes, Michael Hartney and Christopher Witko for helpful comments. Data replication sets are available at https//dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS, and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123416000302.

References

Achen, Christopher. 1978. Measuring Representation. American Journal of Political Science 22:475510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher. 2005. Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis. Political Analysis 13:447456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlquist, John S., and Levi, Margaret. 2013. In the Interest of Others: Organizations and Social Activism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, de Figueiredo, John M., and Snyder, James M.,. 2003. Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17:105130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, Herbert B., Heberlig, Eric, Ripley, Randall, and Snyder, Karen. 2001. American Labor Unions in the Electoral Arena. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, R. Frank, Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, Andre, and Bodet, Marc Andre. 2006. Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policymakers? Comparative Political Studies 39:12431262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, Baker, Regina S., and Finnigan, Ryan. 2013. When Unionization Disappears State-Level Unionization and Working Poverty in the United States. American Sociological Review 78:872896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2004. A Technique for Estimating Candidate and Voter Locations. Electoral Studies 23:623639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Harden, Jeffrey J.. 2010. New Measures of Partisanship, Ideology, and Policy Mood in the American States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10:136156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher. 2012. Understanding Economic Biases in Representation: Income, Resources, and Policy Representation in the 110th House. Political Research Quarterly 65:938951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Facchini, Giovanni, Mayda, Anna Maria, and Mishra, Prachi. 2011. Do Interest Groups Affect U.S. Immigration Policy? Journal of International Economics 85:114128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellowes, Matthew C., and Rowe, Gretchen. 2004. Politics and the New American Welfare States. American Journal of Political Science 48:362373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, Patrick. 2012. Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States. American Politics Research 40:2959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, Patrick. 2015. Lobbying Regulations and Political Equality in the American States. American Politics Research 43:304326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, Patrick, and Hartney, Michael T.. 2015. When Government Subsidizes Its Own: Collective Bargaining Laws as Agents of Political Mobilization. American Journal of Political Science 59:896911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, Patrick, and Radcliff, Benjamin. 2011. Labor Union Membership and Voting Across Nations. Electoral Studies 30:633641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Anthony. 2013. Electoral and Policy Consequences of Voter Turnout: Evidence from Compulsory Voting in Australia. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8:159182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francia, Peter L. 2006. The Future of Organized Labor in American Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, William W., Tolbert, Caroline, and Witko, Christopher. 2013. Inequality, Self-Interest and Public Support for ‘Robin Hood’ Tax Policies. Political Research Quarterly 66:923937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershtenson, Joseph, and Plane, Dennis L.. 2007. Ideology and Representation in the US Senate: Roll Calls v. Constituent Assessments. Journal of Legislative Studies 13:558576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giger, Nathalie, Rosset, Jan, and Bernauer, Julian. 2012. The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective. Representation 48:4761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 69:778796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2009. Preference Gaps and Inequality in Representation. PS: Political Science & Politics 42:335341.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12:564581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Matt, and Stramski, Jacek. 2010. Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 54:90106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfield, Michael. 1987. The Decline of Organized Labor in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Lowery, David, Fellowes, Matthew, and McAtee, Andrea. 2004. Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Organized Interests in the American States. Political Research Quarterly 57:411420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D., and Flavin, Patrick. 2007. Racial Differences in Information, Expectations, and Accountability. Journal of Politics 69:220236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D., and Newman, Brian. 2005. Are Voters Better Represented? Journal of Politics 67:12061227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D., and Newman, Brian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner Take All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Wayman, Frank W.. 1990. Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees. American Political Science Review 84:797820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander M. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Leighley, Jan E.. 1992. The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates. American Journal of Political Science 36:351365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Barry T., Macpherson, David A., and Vroman, Wayne G.. 2001. Estimates of Union Density by State. Monthly Labor Review 124:5155.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Jessee, Stephen A. 2009. Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election. American Political Science Review 103:5981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Nathan J. 2009. The Politics of Income Inequality in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Nathan J., and Witko, Christopher. 2012. Federalism and American Inequality. Journal of Politics 74:414426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingman, David, and Lammers, William W.. 1984. The ‘General Policy Liberalism’ Factor in American State Politics. American Journal of Political Science 28:598610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, Laura I. 1986. Money and Access: Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Politics 48:10521062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Nagler, Jonathan. 1992. Socioeconomic Class Bias in Turnout, 1964–1988: The Voters Remain the Same. American Political Science Review 86:725736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Nagler, Jonathan. 2007. Unions, Voter Turnout, and Class Bias in the U.S. Electorate, 1964–2004. Journal of Politics 69:430441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey B., and Linzer, Drew A.. 2005. Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable is Based on Estimates. Political Analysis 13:345364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makinson, Larry. 2003. Speaking Freely: Washington Insiders Talk About Money in Politics. Washington, DC: Center for Responsive Politics.Google Scholar
Masters, Marick F., and Delaney, John T.. 2005. Organized Labor’s Political Scorecard. Journal of Labor Research 26:365392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1964. Majority Rule and the Representative System of Government. In Cleavages, Ideologies, and Party Systems, edited by Erik Allardt and Yrjo Littunen, 343376. Helsinki: Academic Bookstore.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2009. The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules. Comparative Political Studies 42:14751497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Lynda W. 1982. Issue Representation in Congress. Journal of Politics 44:658678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Lynda W. 1989. Analyzing Misinformation: Perceptions of Congressional Candidates’ Ideologies. American Journal of Political Science 33:272293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Lynda W. 2012. The Influence of Campaign Contributions in State Legislatures: The Effects of Institutions and Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin. 2001. Organized Labor and Electoral Participation in American National Elections. Journal of Labor Research 22:405414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin, and Saiz, Martin. 1998. Labor Organization and Public Policy in the American States. Journal of Politics 60:113125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, Elizabeth, and Wright, Gerald C.. 2011. Whose Statehouse Democracy: Policy Responsiveness to Poor Versus Rich Constituents in Poor Versus Rich States. In Who Gets Represented? edited by Peter Enns and Christopher Wlezian, 189222. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Rigby, Elizabeth, and Wright, Gerald C.. 2013. Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States. American Journal of Political Science 57:552565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Jake. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, Martin. 1995. Speaking Freely: Former Members of Congress Talk About Money in Politics. Washington, DC: Center for Responsive Politics.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorauf, Frank. 1988. Money in American Elections. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Sorens, Jason, Muedini, Fait, and Ruger, William P.. 2008. U.S. State and Local Public Policies in 2006: A New Database. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8:309326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, John D. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valletta, Robert G., and Freeman, Richard B.. 1988. Appendix B: The NBER Public Sector Collective Bargaining Law Data Set. In When Public Sector Workers Unionize, edited by Richard B. Freeman and Casey Ichniowski, 399419. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 2003. Would the Dream of Political Equality Turn Out to Be a Nightmare? Perspectives on Politics 1:663680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Volscho, Thomas W., and Kelly, Nathan J.. 2012. The Rise of the Super-Rich: Power Resources, Taxes, Financial Markets, and the Dynamics of the Top 1 Percent, 1949 to 2008. American Sociological Review 77:679699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witko, Christopher. 2006. PACs, Issue Context, and Congressional Decisionmaking. Political Research Quarterly 59:283295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witko, Christopher, and Newmark, Adam J.. 2005. Business Mobilization and Public Policy in the U.S. States. Social Science Quarterly 86:356367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 1978. Candidates’ Policy Positions and Voting in U.S. Congressional Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 3:445464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Flavin supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Flavin supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 95 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Flavin Dataset

Link
18
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Labor Union Strength and the Equality of Political Representation
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Labor Union Strength and the Equality of Political Representation
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Labor Union Strength and the Equality of Political Representation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *