Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-8zwnf Total loading time: 0.552 Render date: 2022-12-04T05:57:27.156Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English
British Journal of Political Science British Journal of Political Science

Article contents

Mass Participation, Electoral Competitiveness, and Issue-Attitude Agreement Between Congressmen and their Constituents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Kim Quaile Hill  and
Patricia A. Hurley
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent research Verba and Nie and Hansen have provided systematic evidence on the positive effects of mass participation on other aspects of the public policy process. Specifically, Verba and Nie demonstrated that for data on American communities, a curvilinear relationship exists between the level of mass political participation and the extent of elite-mass agreement on ‘policy agenda’ items. The effect of this relationship is such that the highest agreement, or ‘attitude concurrence’, is found in those communities with the highest levels of participation. Working with the same data, Hansen3 showed that the competitiveness of elections also influences concurrence independently and that there was an interaction effect of participation and competition on policy-agenda agreement. The interaction was such that attitude concurrence was highest in communities with especially high levels of both participation and competition.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1979 , pp. 507 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman H., Participation in America (New York: Harper and Row, 1972).Google Scholar

2 Hansen, Susan Blackall, ‘Participation, Political Structure, and Concurrence’, American Political Science Review, LXIX (1975), 1181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Hansen, , ‘Participation, Political Structure, and Concurrence’, pp. 1193–4.Google Scholar

4 Verba, and Nie, , Participation in America, pp. 301–4.Google Scholar

5 Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E., ‘Constituency Influence in Congress’, American Political Science Review, LVII (1963), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Because metropolitan areas and non-metropolitan counties, rather than Congressional districts, were the original sampling units, the districts were weighted in the original analysis in order to make the weighted sample a representative one. A second result of this procedure, as discussed by Miller and Stokes (see fn. 5) is an increase in the reliability of the original averaged constituency-attitude scores.

7 These subsets were created by dividing the sample into four groups along the mean value for participation and a value of 45 per cent or more of the votes won by the losing congressional candidate.

4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Mass Participation, Electoral Competitiveness, and Issue-Attitude Agreement Between Congressmen and their Constituents
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Mass Participation, Electoral Competitiveness, and Issue-Attitude Agreement Between Congressmen and their Constituents
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Mass Participation, Electoral Competitiveness, and Issue-Attitude Agreement Between Congressmen and their Constituents
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *