Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-7j4dq Total loading time: 0.373 Render date: 2022-09-25T06:43:25.221Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2017

Abstract

Various theories of democratic governance posit that citizens should vote for incumbent politicians when they provide good service, and vote for the opposition when service delivery is poor. But does electoral accountability work as theorized, especially in developing country contexts? Studying Southern African democracies, where infrastructural investment in basic services has expanded widely but not universally, we contribute a new empirical answer to this question. Analyzing the relationship between service provision and voting, we find a surprising negative relationship: improvements in service provision predict decreases in support for dominant party incumbents. Though stronger in areas where opposition parties control local government, the negative relationship persists even in those areas where local government is run by the nationally dominant party. Survey data provide suggestive evidence that citizen concerns about corruption and ratcheting preferences for service delivery may be driving citizen attitudes and behaviors. Voters may thus be responsive to service delivery, but perhaps in ways that are more nuanced than extant theories previously recognized.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Assistant Professor, UC Merced Political Science (email: ddekadt@ucmerced.edu); graduate student at MIT when article was accepted). Total Professor of Political Science and Contemporary Africa, MIT Political Science (email: evanlieb@mit.edu). Author names are listed alphabetically. Thank you to Michael Bratton, Gary King, Beatriz Magaloni-Kerpel and Melissa Sands for detailed commentary. We are grateful to Jessica Grody and Blair Read for research assistance; to Afrobarometer, Stats SA (Helene Verhoef) and the IEC (James Aphane) for sharing data; to members of the Harvard Research Workshop on Comparative Politics, OSU Comparative Politics Seminar, the MIT Poverty, Violence and Development working group, Boston-area Working Group on African Political Economy and discussants at numerous conferences for valuable feedback. A supplementary appendix and replication archive are available online. Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OTEWG2 and online appendices at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000345

References

Ashworth, Scott. 2012. Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work. Annual Review of Political Science 15:183201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Kate. 2013. Why Vote with the Chief? Political Connections and Public Goods Provision in Zambia. American Journal of Political Science 57 (4):794809.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Burgess, Robin. 2001. Political Agency, Government Responsiveness and the Role of the Media. European Economic Review 45 (4):629640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booysen, S. 2007. With the Ballot and the Brick: The Politics of Attaining Service Delivery. Progress in Development Studies 7:2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Mattes, Robert. 2003. Support for Economic Reform? Popular Attitudes in Southern Africa. World Development 31 (2):303323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, David S. 1999. Reading, Writing, and Regime Type: Democracy’s Impact on Primary School Enrollment. Political Research Quarterly 52 (4):681707.Google Scholar
Bruns, Barbara, Filmer, Deon, and Anthony Patrinos, Harry. 2011. Making Schools Work: New Evidence on Accountability Reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kadt, Daniel; Evan, Lieberman, 2017, “Replication Data for: Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa”, doi:10.7910/DVN/OTEWG2, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:s1xmBue3zoyWQ3v6ISrMzg==.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kadt, Daniel, and Horacio, Larreguy. Forthcoming. Agents of the Regime? Traditional Leaders and Electoral Behavior in South Africa. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Dinkelman, Taryn. 2011. The Effects of Rural Electrification on Employment: New Evidence from South Africa. American Economic Review 101:30783108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65 (2):135150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1999. Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation 55:61.Google Scholar
Ferree, Karen E. 2010. Framing the Race in South Africa: The Political Origins of Racial Census Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, Thacker, Strom C., and Alfaro, Rodrigo. 2011. Democracy and Human Development. Journal of Politics 74 (1):117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Min, Brian. 2013. Distributive Politics around the World. Annual Review of Political Science 16:7399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Jessica. 2016. Greater Expectations: A Field Experiment to Improve Accountability in Mali. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):143157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Romero, Roxana. 2013. Decentralisation, Accountability and the 2007 MP Elections in Kenya. Journal of Development Studies 49 (1):7294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Xu, Yiqing. 2016. How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice. SSRN Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Robin. 2015. Attribution and Accountability: Voting for Roads in Ghana. World Politics 67 (4):656689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Robin, and Stasavage, David. 2013. What Democracy Does (and Doesn’t Do) for Basic Services: School Fees, School Inputs, and African Elections [in English]. Journal of Politics 76 (01):229245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hlavac, Marek. 2013. Stargazer: LaTeX Code and ASCII text for Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. http://CRAN. R-project. org/package=stargazer Google Scholar
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., and Stuart, E. A.. 2007. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15 (3):199236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Carolyn E., and Shoup, Brian D.. 2013. Framing the Democratic Narrative: Local and National Voting Patterns in South Africa. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 51 (1):5675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroth, Verena. 2014. Essays in Political Economy: Elections, Public Finance and Service Delivery in South Africa. PhD dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).Google Scholar
Kroth, Verena, Larcinese, Valentino, and Wehner, Joachim. 2015. A Better Life for All? Democratization and Electrification in Post-Apartheid South Africa. The Journal of Politics 78 (3):774791 Google Scholar
Lake, David A., and Baum, Matthew A.. 2001. The Invisible Hand of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies 34 (6):587621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S., Posner, Daniel N., and Tsai, Lily L.. 2014. Does Information Lead to More Active Citizenship? Evidence from an Education Intervention in Rural Kenya. World Development 60:6983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53 (01):69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Gabrielle. 2008. Courting the Kalenjin: The Failure of Dynasticism and the Strength of the ODM Wave in Kenya’s Rift Valley Province. African Affairs 107 (429):541568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: The Politics of Party Hegemony and Its Demise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, Anandi, and Mukand, Sharun. 2007. Democracy, Visibility and Public Good Provision. Journal of Development Economics 83 (2):506529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Robert B. 1995. The Election Book: Judgement and Choice in South Africa’s 1994 election. IDASA, Public Information Centre. Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
Mattes, Robert B.. 2015. South Africa’s Emerging Black Middle Class: A Harbinger of Political Change? Journal of International Development 27 (5):665692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Robert B., and Piombo, Jessica. 2001. Opposition Parties and the Voters in South Africa’s General Election of 1999. Democratization 8 (3):101128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Noah L. 2016. Local Ethnic Geography, Expectations of Favoritism, and Voting in Urban Ghana. Comparative Political Studies 49 (14):18961929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, Rohini. 2011. Can Informed Voters Enforce Better Governance? Experiments in Low-Income Democracies. Annual Review of Economics 3 (1):215237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel N., and Simon, David J.. 2002. Economic Conditions and Incumbent Support in Africa’s New Democracies Evidence from Zambia. Comparative Political Studies 35 (3):313336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Bingham G., and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2):391414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravallion, Martin, and Lokshin, Michael. 2010. Who Cares about Relative Deprivation? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 73:171185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2006. Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science 50 (4):860874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2005a. Democracy and Education Spending in Africa. American Journal of Political Science 49 (2):343358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2005b. The Role of Democracy in Uganda’s Move to Universal Primary Education. Journal of Modern African Studies 43 (1):5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Quincy Thomas. 2006. Reinvigorating Relative Deprivation: A New Measure for a Classic Concept. Social Science Research 35:779802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2013. Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy. American Journal of Political Science 57:685702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2014. Elite Parties and Poor Voters: Theory and Evidence from India. American Political Science Review 108 (02):454477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weghorst, Keith R., and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2013. What Drives the Swing Voter in Africa? American Journal of Political Science 57 (3):717734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2003. World Development Report 2004 Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/book/9780821354681.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2011. Accountability in Public Services in South Africa. Technical report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

de Kadt and Lieberman Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

de Kadt and Lieberman supplementary material

Appendix

Download de Kadt and Lieberman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2 MB
21
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *