Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-q5mmw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-01T01:15:07.569Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

The Origins of Campaign Agendas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2006

Department of Political Science, George Washington University.


Why and how do candidates choose the issues on which their campaigns are based? Drawing on a large database of candidate advertisements from the 1998 House and Senate campaigns, extant theories of issue emphasis, which focus on factors such as party ownership and candidate record, are tested here and these theories are expanded by examining in more detail the role of constituency characteristics. Most notably, party ownership's impact is demonstrated to be weak: candidates are more willing to ‘trespass’ or talk about the other party's issues than previous literature has found. Also ‘trespassing’ is shown to be facilitated by framing the other party's issues in certain ways. The results have implications for theories of candidate strategy and for normative questions, such as how much ‘dialogue’ occurs in campaigns.

Research Article
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)