Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Preference Representation and the Influence of Political Parties in Majoritarian vs. Proportional Systems: An Empirical Test

Abstract

Electoral systems determine the role that representatives’ party affiliations play in political representation. According to conventional expectations, party affiliation drives the behavior of representatives when they are elected under a proportional system, while majoritarian systems mute the role of party affiliation by forcing politicians to converge to the median position of their constituency. This study directly tests these predictions within a common party system by matching referenda decisions of constituents with voting behavior of their representatives who are elected either under a majoritarian or proportional system.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Economics, University of Bayreuth (Germany), and Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Switzerland (email: david.stadelmann@uni-bayreuth.de); Department of Economics, University of Fribourg (Switzerland), and CREMA (email: marco.portmann@unifr.ch); Department of Economics, University of Fribourg (Switzerland), and CREMA (email: reiner.eichenberger@unifr.ch). We would like to thank Dennis Mueller, Mark Schelker and Ronny Freier for illuminating discussions, and three anonymous referees as well as the editor, Sona Golder, for their highly constructive remarks. Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS, and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123416000399

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Christopher H Achen . 1977. Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient. American Journal of Political Science 21 (4):805815.

Stephen Ansolabehere , James M. Snyder , and Charles Stewart III. 2001. The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (4):533572.

Nathan F Batto . 2012. Differing Mandates and Party Loyalty in Mixed-Member Systems: Taiwan as a Baseline Case. Electoral Studies 31 (2):384392. Special Symposium: Generational Differences in Electoral Behaviour.

Kathleen Bawn . 1999. Voter Responses to Electoral Complexity: Ticket Splitting, Rational Voters and Representation in the Federal Republic of Germany. British Journal of Political Science 29 (3):487505.

Julian Bernauer , and Simon Munzert . 2014. Loyal to the Game? Strategic Policy Representation in Mixed Electoral Systems. Representation 50 (1):8397.

André Blais , and Marc A. Bodet . 2006. Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers? Comparative Political Studies 39 (10):12431262.

Ian Budge , Michael McDonald , Paul Pennings , and Hans Keman . 2012. Organizing Democratic Choice: The Party Mandate Over Time. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barry C. Burden , and Gretchen Helmke . 2009. The Comparative Study of Split-Ticket Voting. Electoral Studies 28 (1):17.

John M Carey . 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51:92107.

John M. Carey , and Simon Hix . 2011. The Electoral Sweet Spot: Low-Magnitude Proportional Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 55 (2):383397.

Gary W Cox . 1990. Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4):903935.

Gary W Cox . 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Paolo Dardanelli . 2005. The Parliamentary and Executive Elections in Switzerland. Electoral Studies 24 (1):123129.

Thomas A Garrett . 1999. A Test of Shirking Under Legislative and Citizen Vote: The Case of State Lottery Adoption. Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1):189208.

Elisabeth R. Gerber , and Jeffrey B. Lewis . 2004. Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation. Journal of Political Economy 112 (6):13641383.

Nathalie Giger , and Heike Klüver . 2016. Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation. American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):190205.

Matt Golder , and Gabriella Lloyd . 2014. Re-Evaluating the Relationship Between Electoral Rules and Ideological Congruence. European Journal of Political Research 53:200212.

Matt Golder , and Jacek Stramski . 2010. Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 54 (1):90106.

Bernard Grofman . 2004. Downs and Two-Party Convergence. Annual Review of Political Science 7:2546.

Bernd Hayo , and Florian Neumeier . 2012. Leaders’ Impact on Public Spending Priorities: The Case of the German Laender. Kyklos 65 (4):480511.

Hans-Peter Hertig . 1978. Party Cohesion in the Swiss Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly 3 (1):6381.

Zohal Hessami . 2016. How Do Voters React to Complex Choices in a Direct Democracy? Evidence from Switzerland. Kyklos 69 (2):263293.

Simon Hug , and Tobias Schulz . 2007. Left-Right Positions of Political Parties in Switzerland. Party Politics 13 (3):305330.

Björn Kauder , and Niklas Potrafke . 2016. Supermajorities and Political Rent Extraction. Kyklos 69 (1):6581.

David S. Lee , Enrico Moretti , and Matthew J. Butler . 2004. Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the U.S. House. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3):807859.

Arend Lijphart . 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Alessandro Lizzeri , and Nicola Persico . 2001. The Provision of Public Goods Under Alternative Electoral Incentives. American Economic Review 91 (1):225239.

John G Matsusaka . 2001. Problems with a Methodology Used to Evaluate the Voter Initiative. Journal of Politics 63 (4):12501256.

Dennis C Mueller . 2003. Public Choice, 3rd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roger B Myerson . 1999. Theoretical Comparisons of Electoral Systems. European Economic Review 43 (4–6):671697.

Torsten Persson , and Guido Tabellini . 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marco Portmann , David Stadelmann , and Reiner Eichenberger . 2012. District Magnitude and Representation of the Majority’s Preferences: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Popular and Parliamentary Votes. Public Choice 151 (3–4):585610.

G. Bingham Powell . 2009. The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules. Comparative Political Studies 42 (12):14751497.

René Ruske . 2015. Does Economics Make Politicians Corrupt? Empirical Evidence from the United States Congress. Kyklos 68 (2):240254.

Ulrich Sieberer . 2010. Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems: Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag. Electoral Studies 29 (3):484496.

David Stadelmann , Marco Portmann , and Reiner Eichenberger . 2012. Evaluating the Median Voter Model’s Explanatory Power. Economics Letters 114 (3):312314.

David Stadelmann , Marco Portmann , and Reiner Eichenberger . 2013. Quantifying Parliamentary Representation of Constituents’ Preferences with Quasi-Experimental Data. Journal of Comparative Economics 41 (1):170180.

David Stadelmann , Marco Portmann , and Reiner Eichenberger . 2014. The Law of Large Districts: How District Magnitude Affects the Quality of Political Representation. European Journal of Political Economy 35:128140.

Thomas Stratmann . 1992. Are Contributors Rational? Untangling Strategies of Political Action Committees. The Journal of Political Economy 100 (3):647664.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Stadelmann supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (103 KB)
103 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 79 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 709 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th December 2016 - 18th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.