Calfano, Brian Robert Djupe, Paul A. Cox, Daniel and Jones, Robert 2016. Muslim Mistrust: The Resilience of Negative Public Attitudes after Complimentary Information. Journal of Media and Religion, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 29.
Cassese, Erin C. and Holman, Mirya R. 2016. Religious Beliefs, Gender Consciousness, and Women’s Political Participation. Sex Roles,
Garner, Andrew D. and Palmer, Harvey D. 2016. Following the Crowd or Thinking Outside of the Box? Saliency and Issue Consistency. Social Science Quarterly,
Holman, Mirya R. and Schneider, Monica C. 2016. Gender, race, and political ambition: how intersectionality and frames influence interest in political office. Politics, Groups, and Identities, p. 1.
Wojcieszak, Magdalena Bimber, Bruce Feldman, Lauren and Stroud, Natalie Jomini 2016. Partisan News and Political Participation: Exploring Mediated Relationships. Political Communication, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 241.
C. Cassese, Erin Holman, Mirya R. Schneider, Monica C. and Bos, Angela L. 2015. Building a Gender and Methodology Curriculum: Integrated Skills, Exercises, and Practices. Journal of Political Science Education, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 61.
Krupnikov, Yanna and Piston, Spencer 2015. Accentuating the Negative: Candidate Race and Campaign Strategy. Political Communication, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 152.
Hayes, Robin J. and Greer, Christina M. 2014. The International Dimensions of Everyday Black Political Participation. Journal of African American Studies, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 353.
Muste, C. P. 2014. The Implications of Survey Modes and Methods in Measuring Social-Group Closeness. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 78, Issue. 4, p. 859.
Baum, Lawrence 2013. Linking Issues to Ideology in the Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Courts, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 89.
Jones-Correa, Michael and de Graauw, Els 2013. Looking Back to See Ahead: Unanticipated Changes in Immigration from 1986 to the Present and Their Implications for American Politics Today. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 209.
Lipscomb, Martin 2013. Some may beg to differ: individual beliefs and group political claims. Nursing Philosophy, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 254.
Palmer, Harvey D. Whitten, Guy D. and Williams, Laron K. 2013. Who should be chef? The dynamics of valence evaluations across income groups during economic crises. Electoral Studies, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 425.
2013. Combined References for Electoral Studies Special Edition. Electoral Studies, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. I.
Aarøe, Lene 2012. Does Tolerance of Religion in the Public Space Depend on the Salience of the Manifestation of Religious Group Membership?. Political Behavior, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 585.
Hannagan, Rebecca J. Schneider, Monica C. and Greenlee, Jill S. 2012. Data, Methods, and Theoretical Implications. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 45, Issue. 02, p. 232.
Taber, Charles S. and Lodge, Milton 2012. MOTIVATED SKEPTICISM IN THE EVALUATION OF POLITICAL BELIEFS (2006). Critical Review, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 157.
Wilson, J. Matthew 2012. How are we doing? Group-based economic assessments and African American political behavior. Electoral Studies, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 550.
Garner, Andrew and Palmer, Harvey 2011. Polarization and Issue Consistency Over Time. Political Behavior, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 225.
Jackson, Melinda S. 2011. Priming the Sleeping Giant: The Dynamics of Latino Political Identity and Vote Choice. Political Psychology, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 691.
This article outlines a cognitive-affective model of the role of social groups in political thinking. The model is based on the assumptions that people have stored information and emotional reactions to social groups, and that people are purposive in their thinking about social groups in the sense that they are interested in understanding what various groups have obtained and whether it is deserved. The process through which social groups influence political thinking varies significantly depending upon whether an individual identifies with the group in question. Generally, people are more inclined to feel sympathetic towards the groups to which they belong. These ideas are illustrated with an empirical analysis that focuses on women's issues and makes use of data collected in the 1984 National Election Study Pilot Study.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.