Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 68
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bankoff, Greg 2016. Natural Hazards and Peoples in the Indian Ocean World.

    DeAngelis, Reed Acevedo, Gabriel and Xu, Xiaohe 2016. Secular Volunteerism among Texan Emerging Adults: Exploring Pathways of Childhood and Adulthood Religiosity. Religions, Vol. 7, Issue. 6, p. 74.

    Kestilä-Kekkonen, Elina and Söderlund, Peter 2016. Political Trust, Individual-level Characteristics and Institutional Performance: Evidence from Finland, 2004-13. Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 138.

    Meijer, Ellen Schout, Gert and Abma, Tineke 2016. Am I My Brother’s Keeper? Moral Dimensions of Informal Caregiving in a Neoliberal Society. Health Care Analysis,

    Miles-Touya, Daniel and Rossi, Máximo 2016. Cultural transmission of civic attitudes. SpringerPlus, Vol. 5, Issue. 1,

    Muskett, Judith A. 2016. Associational social capital and psychological type: an empirical enquiry among cathedral Friends in England. Journal of Beliefs & Values, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Park, Sohyun and Cnaan, Ram A. 2016. The Multifaceted Nature of Civic Participation: A Literature Review. Voluntaristics Review, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Rapp, Carolin 2016. Moral opinion polarization and the erosion of trust. Social Science Research, Vol. 58, p. 34.

    Sarracino, Francesco and Mikucka, Małgorzata 2016. Social Capital in Europe from 1990 to 2012: Trends and Convergence. Social Indicators Research,

    Anstead, Nick 2015. The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society.

    Antoci, Angelo Sabatini, Fabio and Sodini, Mauro 2015. Online and Offline Social Participation and Social Poverty Traps: Can Social Networks Save Human Relations?. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 229.

    Antonini, Matteo Hogg, Michael A. Mannetti, Lucia Barbieri, Barbara and Wagoner, Joseph A. 2015. Motivating Citizens to Participate in Public Policymaking: Identification, Trust and Cost-Benefit Analyses. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 131.

    Tomazos, Kostas and Luke, Sheila 2015. Mega-sports Events Volunteering: Journeys with a Past, a Present and a Future. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 1337.

    Akinbo, Olujide T. 2014. Service Learning and Environmental Chemistry: Relevant Connections.

    Gajewska, Katarzyna 2014. The Strategies of Recent Polish Left Social Movement Organizations: Two Cases of Membership-poor Organizations. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 103.

    Hao, Xiaoming Wen, Nainan and George, Cherian 2014. News consumption and political and civic engagement among young people. Journal of Youth Studies, Vol. 17, Issue. 9, p. 1221.

    Muskett, Judith A. 2014. Measuring religious social capital: scale properties of the modified Williams Religious Social Capital Index among Friends of cathedrals. Journal of Beliefs & Values, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 242.

    Painter, Matthew A. and Paxton, Pamela 2014. Checkbooks in the Heartland: Change over Time in Voluntary Association Membership. Sociological Forum, Vol. 29, Issue. 2, p. 408.

    Sarracino, Francesco 2014. Richer in Money, Poorer in Relationships and Unhappy? Time Series Comparisons of Social Capital and Well-Being in Luxembourg. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 115, Issue. 2, p. 561.

    Shaw, Aileen Brady, Bernadine McGrath, Brian Brennan, Mark A. and Dolan, Pat 2014. Understanding youth civic engagement: debates, discourses, and lessons from practice. Community Development, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 300.


Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2005

In his 1790 address to the Académie Française in Paris, Condorcet noted that every new generation has a tendency to accuse itself of being less civic-minded than previous cohorts. Two centuries later, this argument has once again regained front-page status. The debate is currently focused on the question of whether or not social capital and civic engagement are declining in Western societies. In his academic best-seller Bowling Alone, Robert Putnam argues that younger age cohorts, socialized in the prosperous economic conditions of the 1960s and onwards, are less inclined to engage in community life and in politics, and also less likely to trust their fellow citizens. By contrast, the ‘long civic generation’, born roughly between 1910 and 1940, is portrayed as much more motivated in these respects. They readily volunteer in community projects, read newspapers and take on more social responsibilities. In this view, a process of generational replacement is responsible for a steady decline of social capital and civic engagement in American society. As the long civic generation is replaced by younger age cohorts, the social capital stock of American communities slowly diminishes. The indicators used to substantiate this claim are numerous and diverse: measures for voter turnout, attendance of club meetings, generalized trust, the number of common family dinners, the number of card games played together, and even respect for traffic rules. All of these attitudes and behaviours, it is argued, depict a significant downward trend.

Although Putnam is by far the most vocal of all scholars in the ‘decline of social capital’ choir, he certainly is not the only author describing an erosion of traditional societal relations.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *