Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 35
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    de Moor, Joost 2016. External Efficacy and Political Participation Revisited: The Role of Perceived Output Structures for State- and Non-State-Oriented Action Forms. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 69, Issue. 3, p. 642.

    Dejaeghere, Yves and Vanhoutte, Bram 2016. Virtuous villages and sinful cities? A spatial analysis into the effects of community characteristics on turnout and blank/invalid voting in local elections in Belgium 2006–2012. Acta Politica, Vol. 51, Issue. 1, p. 80.

    Donovan, Todd Tolbert, Caroline and Gracey, Kellen 2016. Campaign civility under preferential and plurality voting. Electoral Studies, Vol. 42, p. 157.

    Henderson, Ailsa and Romanova, Valentyna 2016. Multi-level voting and party competition in vertically simultaneous elections: the case of Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 201.

    Kölln, Ann-Kristin 2016. The virtuous circle of representation. Electoral Studies, Vol. 42, p. 126.

    Northmore-Ball, Ksenia 2016. Increasingly unequal turnout in Eastern European new democracies: Communist and transitional legacies versus new institutions. Electoral Studies, Vol. 42, p. 188.

    Rainey, Carlisle 2016. Does district magnitude matter? The case of Taiwan. Electoral Studies, Vol. 41, p. 202.

    Yıldırım, Kerem 2016. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication.

    Christensen, Henrik Serup 2015. Power Sharing and Political Dissatisfaction: A Multilevel Analysis of the Link Between Power-Sharing Institutions and Kinds of Political Dissatisfaction in 24 European Democracies. European Politics and Society, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 280.

    Dassonneville, Ruth Blais, André and Dejaeghere, Yves 2015. Staying With the Party, Switching or Exiting? A Comparative Analysis of Determinants of Party Switching and Abstaining. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 387.

    Karp, Jeffrey A. and Milazzo, Caitlin 2015. Democratic Scepticism and Political Participation in Europe. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Kim, Taehan Flanagan, Constance A. and Pykett, Alisa A. 2015. Adolescents’ Civic Commitments in Stable and Fledgling Democracies: The Role of Family, School, and Community. Research in Human Development, Vol. 12, Issue. 1-2, p. 28.

    Lamare, J. Ryan and Lamare, James W. 2015. Electoral reform, situational forces, and political confidence: Results from a multi-wave panel. Electoral Studies, Vol. 40, p. 361.

    Scotto, Thomas J. and Xena, Carla 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.

    Velasquez, Alcides and LaRose, Robert 2015. Social Media for Social Change: Social Media Political Efficacy and Activism in Student Activist Groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 456.

    Davis, Nicholas T. 2014. Responsiveness and the rules of the game: How disproportionality structures the effects of winning and losing on external efficacy. Electoral Studies, Vol. 36, p. 129.

    Garry, John 2014. Holding parties responsible at election time: Multi-level, multi-party government and electoral accountability. Electoral Studies, Vol. 34, p. 78.

    Hooghe, Marc and Quintelier, Ellen 2014. Political participation in European countries: The effect of authoritarian rule, corruption, lack of good governance and economic downturn. Comparative European Politics, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 209.

    Lefkofridi, Zoe Giger, Nathalie and Gallego, Aina 2014. Electoral Participation in Pursuit of Policy Representation: Ideological Congruence and Voter Turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 291.

    Altman, David 2013. Does an Active Use of Mechanisms of Direct Democracy Impact Electoral Participation? Evidence from the U.S. States and the Swiss Cantons. Local Government Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 6, p. 739.


Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 08 February 2008

Advocates of proportional representation (PR) often cite its potential for increasing citizen involvement in politics as one of PR's fundamental advantages over plurality or first-past-the-post systems. The assumption is that plurality electoral systems distort the translation of votes into seats, discouraging and alienating small party supporters and other political minorities. In contrast, PR systems are believed to provide greater opportunities for representation which are assumed to instil greater efficacy and increase participation. We examine this theory linking institutions to electoral participation across a diverse set of countries using data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Using a multi-level approach we find evidence consistent with the expectations about the negative influence of disproportional systems on political minorities. Voters are also likely to have stronger partisan preferences in PR systems, which enhances political efficacy and increases voter participation. The effects of PR, however, are not all positive; broad coalitions, which are likely to be a feature of these systems, reduce political efficacy.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *