Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Role of Rules in Representation: Group Membership and Electoral Incentives

  • Brian F. Crisp, Betul Demirkaya, Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer and Courtney Millian
Abstract

Existing research shows that the election of members of previously underrepresented groups can have significant consequences for policymaking. Yet, quotas, reserved seats, communal rolls, and race-conscious districting make it difficult to distinguish whether it is group membership, electoral incentives, or a combination of the two that matters. It is argued here that lawmakers who are members of underrepresented groups will stand out as defenders of their group’s interests only when electoral rules incentivize them to do so. This is demonstrated empirically using data from New Zealand, showing that Māori Members of Parliament systematically vary in the extent to which they represent their ethnic group as a function of the three different sets of rules under which they were elected.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis (emails: crisp@wustl.edu; betul.demirkaya@wustl.edu; clmillian@gmail.com), except Schwindt-Bayer, who is at the Department of Political Science, Rice University (email: schwindt@rice.edu).The authors would like to thank Megan Linquiti and the other members of the Democratic Institutions Research Team (D.I.R.T.) for their research assistance, and Matt Gabel and Bill Mishler for their comments on an earlier draft of this article. Data replication sets available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000691. Replication data and code, as well as appendices not for print publication, are available at http://pages.wustl.edu/crisp.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Barker, Fiona, and McLeay, Elizabeth. 2000. How Much Change? An Analysis of the Initial Impact of Proportional Representation on the New Zealand Party System. Party Politics 6 (2):131154.
Barnes, Tiffany D. 2012. Gender and Legislative Preferences: Evidence from the Argentine Provinces. Politics & Gender 8 (4):483507.
Battle, Martin. 2011. Second-Class Representatives or Work Horses? Committee Assignments and Electoral Incentives in the Scottish Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 64 (3):494512.
Batto, Nathan F. 2012. Differing Mandates and Party Loyalty in Mixed-Member Systems: Taiwan as a Baseline Case. Electoral Studies 38 (2):384392.
Bernauer, Julian, Giger, Nathalie, and Rosset, Jan. 2015. Mind the Gap: Do Proportional Electoral Systems Foster a More Equal Representation of Women and Men, Poor and Rich? International Political Science Review 36 (1):7898.
Beyer, Georgina. 2010. Māori in General Seats. Pp. 201212 in Māori and Parliament: Diverse Strategies and Compromises, edited by Maria Bargh. Wellington: Huia Publishers.
Bird, Karen. 2014. Ethnic Quotas and Ethnic Representation Worldwide. International Political Science Review 35 (1):1226.
Bohrer, Robet E., and Krutz, Glen S.. 2004. Duverger and Devolution: A Note on the Effects of New Electoral Rules in the UK. Electoral Studies 23 (2):315327.
Bohrer, Robet E., and Krutz, Glen S.. 2005. The Devolved Party Systems of the United Kingdom: Sub-National Variation from the National Model. Party Politics 11 (6):654673.
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2006. The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence from the States. Social Science Quarterly 87 (5):11361157.
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race. Journal of Politics 61 (3):658679.
Bridges, Simon. 2010. Diversity Enriches the View. Pp. 213217 in Māori and Parliament: Diverse Strategies and Compromises, edited by Maria and Bargh. Wellington: Huia Publishers.
Calvo, Ernesto, and Medina, Jose Manuel Abal. 2002. Institutional Gamblers: Majoritarian Representation, Electoral Uncertainty, and the Coalitional Costs of Mexico’s Hybrid Electoral System. Electoral Studies 21 (3):453471.
Calvo, Ernesto, and Hellwig, Timothy. 2011. Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Different Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 55 (1):2741.
Carey, John M. 2005. Report for President Eduardo Rodriguez Vetlze Regarding Issues of Electoral and Constitutional Reform Based on Meetings of 8–11 August, La Paz, Bolivia. (Unpublished.)
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4):417439.
Chattopadhyay, R., and Duflo, Esther. 2004. Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India. Econometrica 72 (5):14091443.
Childs, Sarah. 2008. Women and British Party Politics: Descriptive, Substantive and Symbolic Representation. London: Routledge.
Clark, Jennifer Hayes, and Caro, Veronica. 2013. Multimember Districts and the Substantive Representation of Women: An Analysis of Legislative Cosponsorship Networks. Politics & Gender 9 (1):130.
Cox, Gary W. 1990. Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4):903935.
Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, & Representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Denemark, David. 2001. Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 Electoral Reform. Pp. 7095 in Mixed Members Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, edited by Matthew S. Shugartand Martin P. Wattenberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dow, Jay K. 2011. Party-System Extremism in Majoritarian and Proportional Electoral Systems. British Journal of Political Science 41 (2):341361.
Ferrara, Federico. 2004a. Electoral Coordination and the Strategic Desertion of Strong Parties in Compensatory Mixed Systems with Negative Vote Transfers. Electoral Studies 23 (3):391413.
Ferrara, Federico. 2004b. Frogs, Mice, and Mixed Member Electoral Institutions: Party Discipline in the XIV Italian Chamber of Deputies. Journal of Legislative Studies 10 (4):1031.
Gay, Claudine. 2007. Legislating without Constraints: The Effect of Minority Districting on Legislators’ Responsiveness to Constituency Preferences. Journal of Politics 69 (2):442456.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Haspel, Moshe, Remington, Thomas F., and Smith, Steven S.. 1998. Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma. Journal of Politics 60 (2):417439.
Hennl, Annika, and Kaiser, André. 2008. Ticket Balancing in Mixed-Member Proportional Systems: Comparing Sub-National Elections in Germany. Electoral Studies 27 (2):321336.
Herron, Erik S., and Nishikawa, Misa. 2001. Contamination Effects and the Number of Parties in Mixed-Superposition Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies 20 (1):6386.
Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, and Preuhs, Robert R.. 2012. Irreplaceable Legislators? Rethinking Minority Representatives in the New Century. American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):705715.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1998. In a Different Voice: Women and the Policy Process. Pp. 188202 in Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, edited by S. Thomas and C. Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kerevel, Yann. 2010. The Legislative Consequences of Mexico’s Mixed-Member Electoral System, 2000–2009. Electoral Studies 29 (4):691703.
King, Ronald F., and Marian, Cosmin Gabriel. 2012. Minority Representation and Reserved Legislative Seats in Romania. East European Politics & Societies 26 (3):561588.
Kostadinova, Tatiana. 2007. Ethnic and Women’s Representation under Mixed Election Systems. Electoral Studies 26 (2):418431.
Lundberg, Thomas C. 2014. Tensions between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics. Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2):351370.
Matland, Richard E. 1993. Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway. Journal of Politics 55 (3):737755.
Meier, Kenneth J., Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, Wrinkle, Robert D. and Polinard, J. L.. 2005. Structural Choices and Representational Biases: The Post-Election Color of Representation. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4):758768.
Minta, Michael D. 2009. Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (2):193218.
Owens, Chris T. 2005. Black Substantive Representation in State Legislatures from 1971–1994. Social Science Quarterly 86 (4):779791.
Pande, Rohini. 2003. Can Mandated Political Representation Increase Policy Influence for Disadvantaged Minorities? Theory and Evidence from India. American Economic Review 93 (4):11321151.
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Painter, Matthew A.. 2010. Growth in Women’s Political Representation: A Longitudinal Exploration of Democracy, Electoral System and Gender Quotas. European Journal of Political Research 49 (1):2552.
Pekkanen, Robert, Nyblade, Benjamin, and Krauss, Ellis S.. 2006. Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems: Party, Posts, and Zombie Politicians in Japan. American Political Science Review 100 (2):183193.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Preuhs, Robert R. 2006. The Conditional Effects of Minority Descriptive Representation: Black Legislators and Policy Influence in the American States. Journal of Politics 68 (3):585599.
Reynolds, Andrew. 2006. Electoral Systems and the Protection and Participation of Minorities. London: Minority Rights Group International.
Saalfeld, Thomas. 2011. Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–2010. Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3):271289.
Scheiner, Ethan. 2008. Does Electoral System Reform Work? Electoral System Lessons from the Reforms of the 1990s. Annual Review of Political Science 11:161181.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shugart, Matthew S., and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 2001. Mixed Member Electoral Systems: A Definition and Typology. Pp. 924 in Mixed Members Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, edited by Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spindler, Rakura. 2009. Members’ Bills in the New Zealand Parliament. Political Science 61 (1):5179.
Stephens, Mamari. 2010. ‘Tame Kākā’ Still? Māori Members and the Use of Māori Language in the New Zealand House of Representatives. Law Text Culture 14 (1):220246.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Togeby, Lise. 2008. The Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities Denmark as a Deviant Case. Party Politics 14 (3):325343.
Ward, Leigh J. 1998. Second-Class MPs? New Zealand’s Adaptation to Mixed-Member Parliamentary Representation. Political Science 49 (2):125152.
Wilson, Walter. 2009. Latino Representation on Congressional Websites. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (3):427448.
Wilson, Walter Clark. 2010. Descriptive Representation and Latino Interest Bill Sponsorship in Congress. Social Science Quarterly 91 (4):10431062.
Zittel, Thomas, and Gschwend, Thomas. 2008. Individualized Constituency Campaigns and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections. West European Politics 31 (5):9781003.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Crisp supplementary material
Crisp supplementary material 1

 PDF (112 KB)
112 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Crisp et al Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed