Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Party in Time

Abstract

Trends of falling membership and support spell a time of crisis for political parties, possibly of transformation. Dilemmas of principle arise: should partisans revise their normative commitments in whatever way garners new supporters, or would that be to sell their party’s soul? This article investigates this as a problem of intergenerational obligation, examining what consideration (if any) partisans owe their party’s past and future. It seeks to show the limits of conceiving partisanship as a ‘presentist’ activity that is legitimately governed exclusively by the concerns of the present generation, and argues that it must include some notion of showing loyalty to the actions of predecessors and advancing the prospects of those to come. Two corresponding norms of ethical partisanship – fidelity and sustainability – are outlined and discussed. The article’s goal is to refine our concept of what a party is, and in so doing contribute to a broader ethics of activism.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science (email: j.p.white@lse.ac.uk). The article significantly benefitted from the feedback of Geoff Brennan, John Dryzek, Dimitris Efthymiou, Nic Southwood, Fabio Wolkenstein and Lea Ypi, as well as participants of the Moral, Social and Political Theory Seminar at the Australian National University (ANU), four referees of this journal and its editor. The research was facilitated by a visiting fellowship at ANU’s School of Philosophy and a fellowship at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin funded by the EURIAS programme.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

MatteoBonotti . 2012. Partisanship and Political Obligation. Politics 32 (3):153161.

MichaelBruter , and SarahHarrison . 2009. The Future of Our Democracies: Young Party Members in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

AnthonyDowns . 1957a. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65 (2):135150.

ZsoltEnyedi . 2005. The Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation. European Journal of Political Research 44 (5):697720.

JoelFeinberg . 1980. Rights, Justice and the Bounds of Liberty: Essays in Social Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

MichaelFreeden . 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

AxelGosseries , and Lukas H.Meyer . 2009. Intergenerational Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

JohnHorton . 2010. Political Obligation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

RichardKatz , and PeterMair . 2009. The Cartel Party Thesis. Perspectives on Politics 7 (4):753766.

MichaelKenny , and Martin J.Smith . 1997. Discourses of Modernization: Gaitskill, Blair and the Reform of Clause IV. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 7 (1):110126.

AnthonyKing , ed. 2002. Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

GeorgeKlosko . 2005. Political Obligations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

John D.May 1973. Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity. Political Studies 21 (2):135151.

StuartMcAnulla . 2011. Post-Political Poisons? Evaluating the ‘Toxic’ Dimensions of Tony Blair’s Leadership. Representation 47 (3):251263.

Lukas H.Meyer 1997. More Than They Have a Right to: Future People and our Future-Oriented Projects. In Contingent Future Persons: On the Ethics of Deciding Who Will Live, or Not, in the Future, edited by Nick Fotion and Jan C. Heller, 137156. London: Kluwer.

RussellMuirhead . 2006. A Defence of Party Spirit. Perspectives on Politics 4 (4):713727.

Víctor M.Muñiz-Fraticelli 2009. The Problem of a Perpetual Constitution. In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Axel Gosseries and Lukas Meyer, 377410. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

JohnO’Neill . 1993. Future Generations, Present Harms. Philosophy 68 (263):3551.

PeterRiddell . 1997. The End of Clause IV, 1994-95. Contemporary British History 11 (2):2449.

MichaelRidge . 2003. Giving the Dead their Due. Ethics 114 (1):3859.

SamuelScheffler . 1997. Relationships and Responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs 26 (3):189209.

GeorgSimmel . 1904. The Sociology of Conflict: I. American Journal of Sociology 9 (4):490525.

A. JohnSimmons . 1996. Associative Political Obligations. Ethics 106 (2):247273.

RodneySmith , and AnikaGauja . 2010. Understanding Party Constitutions as Responses to Specific Challenges. Party Politics 16:755775.

JanTeorell . 1999. A Deliberative Defence of Intra-Party Democracy. Party Politics 5:363382.

AlanWare . 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DavidWeltman , and MichaelBillig . 2001. The Political Psychology of Contemporary Anti-Politics: A Discursive Approach to the End-of-Ideology Era. Political Psychology 22 (2):367382.

JonathanWhite . 2013. Left and Right in the Economic Crisis. Journal of Political Ideologies 18 (2):150170.

JonathanWhite . 2014. Transnational Partisanship: Idea and Practice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (3):377400.

JonathanWhite , and LeaYpi . 2010. Rethinking the Modern Prince: Partisanship and the Democratic Ethos. Political Studies 58 (4):809828.

JonathanWhite , and LeaYpi . 2011. On Partisan Political Justification. American Political Science Review 105 (2):381396.

PaulWhiteley , PatrickSeyd , JeremyRichardson , and PaulBissell . 1994. Explaining Party Activism: The Case of the British Conservative Party. British Journal of Political Science 24 (1):7994.

LisaYoung , and WilliamCross . 2002. Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties. Political Research Quarterly 55 (3):547570.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×