AbneyRonni, AdamsJames, ClarkMichael, EastonMalcolm, EzrowLawrence, KosmidisSpyros
NeundorfAnja. Forthcoming, 2013. When Does Valence Matter? Heightened Valence Effects for Governing Parties During Election Campaigns. Party Politics.
AdamsJames. 2001. Party Competition and Responsible Party Government: A Theory of Spatial Competition Based Upon Insights from Behavioural Voting Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
AdamsJames, ClarkMichael, EzrowLawrence
GlasgowGarrett. 2004. Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or Past Election Results?
British Journal of Political Science
AdamsJames, ClarkMichael, EzrowLawrence
GlasgowGarrett. 2006. Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different From Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science
EzrowLawrence. 2009. Who Do European Parties Represent? How Western European Parties Represent the Policy Preferences of Opinion Leaders. Journal of Politics
AdamsJames, EzrowLawrence, Merrill IIISamuel
Somer-TopcuZeynep. Forthcoming, 2013. Does Collective Responsibility for Performance Alter Party Strategies? Policy-Seeking Parties in Proportional Systems. British Journal of Political Science.
StollHeather. 2009. What Moves Parties? The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies
MerrillSamuelIII. 2009. Policy-Seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation: A Valence-Uncertainty Model. British Journal of Political Science
GrofmanBernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
AdamsHames, MerrillSamuelIII, SimasElizabeth N.
StoneWalter J.. 2011. When Candidates Value Good Character: A Spatial Model with Applications to Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics
Somer-TopcuZeynep. 2009. Do Parties Adjust Their Policies in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts? Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Postwar Democracies. British Journal of Political Science
AldrichJohn. 1983. A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activists. American Political Science Review
AndersonChristopher J. 2000. Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective. Electoral Studies
BanksJeffrey. 1988. Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes. American Political Science Review
KatzJonathan N.. 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review
KatzJonathan N.. 1996. Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis
MeguidBonnie. 2008. Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice. Electoral Studies
BergerMark M., MungerMichael C.
PothoffRichard F. 2000. The Downsian Model Predicts Candidate Divergence. Journal of Theoretical Politics
IngbermanDaniel E.. 1985. Candidate Reputations and the ‘Incumbency Effect’. Journal of Public Economics
BudgeIan. 1994. A New Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology, and Policy Equilibria Viewed Temporally and Comparatively. British Journal of Political Science
BudgeIan, KlingemannHans-Dieter, VolkensAndrea, BaraJudith
TenenbaumEric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BurdenBarry. 2004. Candidate Positioning in U.S. Congressional Elections. British Journal of Political Science
BurkJames. 1999. Public Support for Peacekeeping in Lebanon and Somalia: Assessing the Casualties Hypothesis. Political Science Quarterly
StoneWalter J.. 2012. Candidates Matter: Policy and Quality Differences in Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics
Canes-WroneBrandice, BradyDavid W.
CoganJohn F.. 2002. Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting. American Political Science Review
ClarkMichael. 2009. Valence and Electoral Outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998. Electoral Studies
LeiterDebra. Forthcoming. Does the Ideological Dispersion of Parties Mediate the Electoral Impact of Valence? A Cross-National Study of Party Support in Nine Western European Democracies. Comparative Political Studies.
ClarkeHarold D., SandersDavid, StewartMarianne C.
WhiteleyPaul. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.
ClarkeHarold D., SandersDavid, StewartMarianne C.
WhiteleyPaul. 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
CoxGary. 1990. Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science
CoxGary. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HolmbergSoren. 2005. Party Leaders and Party Choice. Pp. 235–253 in The European Voter edited by Jacques Thomassen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DuvalRobert. 1986. The Political Environment and Foreign Policy Opinions: British Attitudes Towards European Integration, 1972–1979. British Journal of Political Science
DaltonRussell J., FarrellDavid M.
McAllisterIan. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DowJay K. 2001. A Comparative Spatial Analysis of Majoritarian and Proportional Elections. Electoral Studies
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
HinichMelvin J.. 1982. Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition. Journal of Politics
StimsonJames. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 1985. Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
EzrowLawrence. 2007. The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preference of Voters. Journal of Politics
EzrowLawrence, De VriesCatherine, SteenbergenMarco
EdwardsErica. 2011. Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position, or to Their Supporters?
GrofmanBernard. 1991. Incumbency Advantage, Voter Loyalty and the Benefit of the Doubt. Journal of Theoretical Politics
FennoRichard F.Jr. 1978. Home Style. New York: Harper Collins.
FiorinaMorris. 1977. Representatives, Roll-Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
FunkCarolyn L. 1999. Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluations. Journal of Politics
NanniciniTomasso. 2011. Competing on Good Politicians. American Political Science Review
HoboltSara B.. 2008. Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies
JenningsWill. 2012a. The Dynamics of Issue Competence and Vote for Parties In and Out of Power: An Analysis of Valence in Britain, 1979–1997. European Journal of Political Research
JenningsWill. 2012b. Valence as Macro-Competence: An Analysis of Mood in Party Competence Evaluations in Great Britain. British Journal of Political Science
2005. Do Legislators Use ‘Pork’ Projects to Deviate from Constituents’ Interests? Valence Advantages and Position-Taking in Congress. (Unpublished paper, Vanderbilt University.)
GrosecloseTimothy. 2001. A Model of Candidate Location when One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage. American Journal of Political Science
HauptAndrea B. 2010. Parties’ Responses to Economic Globalization: What is Left for the Left and Right for the Right?
HearlDerek. 2001. Checking the Party Policy Estimates: Reliability. Pp. 111–126 in Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, edited by Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Eric Tannenbaum, and Judith Bara. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
IrwinGalen. 1999. Changing Strategies: The Dilemma of the Dutch Labor Party. Pp. 112–140 in Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, edited by Wolfgang Muller and Kaare Strøm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MungerMichael. 1996. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
1993. Keesing's Record of World Events. London: Longman.
1994. Keesing's Record of World Events. London: Longman.
KingAnthony. 2002. Do Leaders’ Personalities Really Matter? Pp. 1–43 in Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, edited by Anthony King. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KitscheltHerbert P. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
GarryJohn. 2003. Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data. American Political Science Review
LaverMichael. 2005. Policy and the Dynamics of Political Competition. American Political Science Review
Lewis-BeckMichael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
RomerThomas. 1993. Polarization, Incumbency, and the Personal Vote. Pp. 355–378 in Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation, edited by William A. Barnett, Melvin J. Hinich, and Norman J. Schofield. New York: Cambridge University Press.
RabinowitzGeorge. 1998. Searching the Paradox of Nonconvergence: Valence, Position, and Direction in Democratic Politics. Electoral Studies
MondakJeffery J.. 1995. Inspected by #1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents’ Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections. American Journal of Political Science
MendesSylvia. 2001. Checking the Party Policy Estimates: Convergent Validity. Pp. 127–142 in Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998, edited by Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Eric Tannenbaum, and Judith Bara. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BudgeIan. 2005. Elections, Parties, and Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGannAnthony. 2002. The Advantages of Ideological Cohesion: A Model of Constituency Representation and Electoral Competition in Multiparty Democracies. Journal of Theoretical Politics
MeguidBonnie. 2005. Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review
AdamsJames. 2002. Centripetal Incentives in Multicandidate Elections. Journal of Theoretical Politics
StokesDonald E.. 1963. Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review
SchofieldNorman. 2003. Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review
MondakJeffery J. 1995. Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents. Journal of Politics
NielsenDaniel L. 2003. Supplying Trade Reform: Political Institutions and Liberalization in Middle-Income Presidential Democracies. American Journal of Political Science
WhittenGuy D.. 2000. Government Competence, Economic Performance and Endogenous Election Dates. Electoral Studies
PancerMark S., BrownSteven D.
Widdis BarrCathy. 1999. Forming Impressions of Political Leaders: A Cross-National Comparison. Political Psychology
Pardos-PradoSergi. 2012. Valence Beyond Consenus. Electoral Studies
PelizzoRiccardo. 2003. Party Position or Party Direction? An Analysis of Party Manifesto Data. West European Politics
PetrocikJohn R. 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science
PowellG. BinghamJr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
RogersWilliam H. 1993. Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples. Stata Technical Bulletin
SchofieldNorman. 2003. Valence Competition in the Spatial Stochastic Model. Journal of Theoretical Politics
SenedItai. 2005. Modeling the Interaction of Parties, Activists, and Voters: Why is the Political Center so Empty?
European Journal of Political Research
SerraGilles. 2010. Polarization of What? A Model of Elections with Endogenous Valence. Journal of Politics
SerraGilles. 2011. Why Primaries? The Party's Tradeoff between Policy and Valence. Journal of Theoretical Politics
ShareDonald. 1999. From Policy-Seeking to Office-Seeking: The Metamorphosis of the of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party. Pp. 89–111 in Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, edited by Wolfgang Muller and Kaare Strøm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2007. Party Policy Strategies and Valence Issues: An Empirical Study of Ten Post-Communist European Party Systems. Paper presented at the Conference on the Dynamics of Party Position Taking, SUNY Binghamton, NY.
Somer-TopcuZeynep. 2009. Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy. Journal of Politics
EriksonRobert. 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review
StokesDonald. 1963. Spatial Models and Party Competition. American Political Science Review
StokesDonald. 1992. Valence Politics. Pp. 141–162 in Electoral Politics, edited by Dennis Kavanagh. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
SimasElizabeth. 2010. Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections. American Journal of Political Science
SullivanJohn L., AldrichJohn H., BorgidaEugene
RahnWendy. 1990. Candidate Appraisal and Human Nature: Man and Superman in the 1984 Election. Political Psychology
DorussenHan. 2011. Globalization, Party Positions, and the Median Voter. World Politics
WarwickPaul. 1999. Ministerial Autonomy or Ministerial Accomodation? Contested Bases of Governmental Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. British Journal of Political Science
WilliamsRick L. 2000. A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster-Correlated Data. Biometrics
WittmanDonald A. 1977. Candidates with Policy Preferences: A Dynamic Model. Journal of Economic Theory
WittmanDonald A. 1983. Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories. American Political Science Review
WittmanDonald A. 1990. Spatial Strategies When Candidates Have Policy Preferences. Pp. 66–98 in Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, edited by James M. Enelow, and Melvin J. Hinich. New York: Cambridge University Press.
WittmanDonald A. 2005. Valence Characteristics, Costly Policy and the Median-Crossing Property: A Diagrammatic Exposition. Public Choice
WittmanDonald A. 2007. Candidate Quality, Pressure Group Endorsements, and the Nature of Political Advertising. European Journal of Political Economy