Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Unhinged Frames: Assessing Thought Experiments in Normative Political Theory

  • Mathias Thaler
Abstract

This article develops a framework for assessing thought experiments in normative political theory. It argues that we should distinguish between relevant and irrelevant hypotheticals according to a criterion of modality. Relevant hypotheticals, while far-fetched, construct imaginary cases that are possible for us, here and now. Irrelevant hypotheticals conjure up imaginary cases that are barely conceivable at all. To establish this claim, the article interrogates, via a discussion of Susan Sontag and Judith Butler’s accounts of representations of violence, the frames through which hypotheticals construct possible worlds, and concludes that some frames are better than others at sustaining a link with the world as we know it. Frames that disrupt this link can be charged with failing to offer action-guidance.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Unhinged Frames: Assessing Thought Experiments in Normative Political Theory
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Unhinged Frames: Assessing Thought Experiments in Normative Political Theory
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Unhinged Frames: Assessing Thought Experiments in Normative Political Theory
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Politics and International Relations, University of Edinburgh (email: mathias.thaler@ed.ac.uk). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Political Theory Research Group meeting in Edinburgh (2015), the PSA General Conference in Sheffield (2015) and the APSA General Conference in San Francisco (2015). The author is grateful to the audiences of all these events for their excellent questions. Special thanks are due to Philip Cook, Liz Frazer, Dustin Howes, Kim Hutchings, Moya Lloyd, Mihaela Mihai, Kieran Oberman and Alan Wilson, who have read various/different versions of this article and proposed highly perceptive and helpful feedback. A debt of gratitude is also due to this Journal’s three referees for suggesting many improvements to the original manuscript. Finally, the author thanks the Editor, Rob Johns, for expertly navigating the article through the review process and for generously offering guidance throughout. The usual disclaimers apply. The research for this article has benefited from a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (JUDGEPOL).

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alfano, Mark, and Loeb, Don. 2014. Experimental Moral Philosophy. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/experimental-moral/, accessed 20 November 2014.
Allhoff, Fritz. 2005. A Defense of Torture: Separation of Cases, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Moral Justification. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19:243264.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy 33:119.
Boltanski, Luc. 1999. Distant Suffering: Morality, Media, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. 2007. F. M. Kamm: Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Available from https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/25299-intricate-ethics-rights-responsibilities-and-permissible-harm/, accessed 14 November 2014.
Brecher, Robert. 2007. Torture and the Ticking Bomb. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Brendel, Elke. 2004. Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments. Dialectica 58:89108.
Brown, James Robert, and Yiftach, Fehige. 2016. “Thought Experiments”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL=<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/thought-experiment/>.
Bufacchi, Vittorio, and Arrigo, Jean Maria. 2006. Torture, Terrorism and the State: A Refutation of the Ticking-Bomb Argument. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23:355373.
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London/New York: Verso.
Butler, Judith. 2007. Torture and the Ethics of Photography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25:951966.
Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London/New York: Verso.
Carroll, Noël. 2002. The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60:326.
Chambers, Samuel A., and Carver, Terrell, eds. 2008. Judith Butler and Political Theory: Troubling Politics. London/New York: Routledge.
Chappell, Timothy. 2014. Knowing What to Do: Imagination, Virtue, and Platonism in Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, Stanley. 2001. States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge/Malden, Mass.: Polity.
Cova, Florian, and Naar, Hichem. 2011. Side-Effect Effect without Side Effects: The Pervasive Impact of Moral Considerations on Judgments of Intentionality. Philosophical Psychology 25:837854.
Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown and Co.
Dershowitz, Alan M. 2002. Why Terrorism Works: Understanding the Threat, Responding to the Challenge. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Edmonds, David. 2013. Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Elster, Jakob. 2011. How Outlandish Can Imaginary Cases Be? Journal of Applied Philosophy 28:241258.
Farrell, Michelle. 2013. The Ticking Bomb Scenario: Origins, Usages and the Contemporary Discourse. Pp. 82146 in The Prohibition of Torture in Exceptional Circumstances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrelly, Colin. 2007. Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation. Political Studies 55:844864.
Foot, Philippa. 1967. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Oxford Review 5:515.
Fried, Gregory. 2014. Review of Uwe Steinhoff, On the Ethics of Torture, SUNY Press 2013. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Available from http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/48412-on-the-ethics-of-torture/, accessed 19 May 2014.
Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Gilabert, Pablo. 2011. Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15:3956.
Gourevitch, Philip. 2008. Exposure: The woman behind the camera at Abu Ghraib. 24 March. Available from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/24/exposure-5, accessed 26 November 2014.
Gross, Oren. 2004. The Prohibition on Torture and the Limits of the Law. Pp. 229251 in Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Kamm, Frances M. 2006. Terrorism and Several Moral Distinctions. Legal Theory 12:1969.
Kamm, Frances M. 2008. Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Knobe, Joshua Michael, and Nichols, Shaun, eds. 2008. Experimental Philosophy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Laden, Anthony Simon. 2011. The Key to/of Public Philosophy. Political Theory 39:112117.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2010. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Luban, David. 2009. Human Dignity, Humiliation, and Torture. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19:211230.
Luban, David. 2014. Torture, Power, and Law. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
McMahan, Jeff. 2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
McMahan, Jeff. 2008. Torture in Principle and in Practice. Public Affairs Quarterly 22:91108.
McMahan, Jeff. 2009. Killing in War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McMahan, Jeff. Forthcoming. Torture and Method in Moral Philosophy. In Torture and the Rule of Law, edited by Scott Anderson and Martha Nussbaum. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mills, Charles W. 2005. ‘Ideal Theory’ as Ideology. Hypatia 20:165183.
Miščević, Nenad. 2013. Political Thought Experiments from Plato to Rawls. Pp. 191206 in Melanie Frappier, Letitia Meynell and Robert Brown, eds, Thought Experiments in Science, Philosophy, and the Arts. New York: Routledge.
Morris, Errol. 2008. The Most Curious Thing. New York Times blog. Available from http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/19/the-most-curious-thing/?, accessed 26 November 2014.
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rejali, Darius M. 2007. Torture and Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2005. Hypothetical Torture in the War on Terrorism. Journal of National Security Law & Policy 1:285340.
Shapiro, Ian. 2005. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Shue, Henry. 1978. Torture. Philosophy and Public Affairs 7:124143.
Shue, Henry. 2006. Torture in Dreamland: Disposing of the Ticking Bomb. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 37:231239.
Sontag, Susan. 1977. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sontag, Susan. 2003. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sontag, Susan. 2004. Regarding the Torture of Others. New York Times, 23 May. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/23/magazine/regarding-the-torture-of-others.html, accessed 9 October 2014.
Sorensen, Roy A. 1992. Thought Experiments. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Standard Operating Procedure, directed by Errol Morris (2008), available at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0896866/
Steinhoff, Uwe. 2010. Defusing the Ticking Social Bomb Argument: The Right to Self-Defensive Torture. Global Dialogue 12:1 Winter/Spring. Available from http://www.worlddialogue.org/content.php?id=457, accessed 19 November 2014.
Steinhoff, Uwe. 2013. On the Ethics of Torture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Stone, Alison. 2005. Towards a Genealogical Feminism: A Reading of Judith Butler’s Political Thought. Contemporary Political Theory 4:424.
Tetlock, Philip E., and Belkin, Aaron, eds. 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1:4766.
Tully, James. 2008. Public Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vaidya, Anand. 2015. The Epistemology of Modality. In Edward N. Zalta ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/modality-epistemology/, accessed 6 October 2015.
Valentini, Laura. 2012. Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass 7:654664.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2011. What Are Moral Absolutes Like? Rochester, N.Y.: Social Science Research Network. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1906850, accessed 26 September 2013.
Walsh, Adrian. 2011. A Moderate Defence of the Use of Thought Experiments in Applied Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14:467481.
Walzer, Michael. 2006. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 4th edn. New York: Basic Books.
Williams, Bernard. 2005. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Wisnewski, J. Jeremy. 2008. It’s About Time: Defusing the Ticking Bomb Argument. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22:103116.
Wisnewski, J. Jeremy. 2014. Review of F. M. Kamm, Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War, Oxford University Press, 2011, in Journal of Moral Philosophy 11:657660.
Zehfuss, Maja. 2009. Hierarchies of Grief and the Possibility of War: Remembering UK Fatalities in Iraq. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38:419440.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed