Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:13:19.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Climate control systems and equipment — heating, energy conservation and system failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Jamieson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Silsoe, Bedford
Get access

Abstract

Conventionally heat consumption forms a small proportion (about 002) of the total cost of producing finishing pigs. Heating costs are incurred from farrowing to about 20 kg live weight and generally represent about 0–05 of production costs to this stage.

Apart from the incorporation of adequate insulation in the building structure, the main means of restricting heating costs is by good control of minimum ventilation rate. Efficient control systems are available but operators do not always fully understand how they are intended to work, so effective training is as important as clear operating instructions.

Techniques exist for the reduction of fossil fuel consumption but all involve the expenditure of additional capital and have running costs of their own. In relation to the current low costs of fossil fuels, oil and propane, even the simplest of these methods are difficult to justify in commercial practice. They include: heat recovery by static recuperator from ventilation exhaust air; and heat recovery by heat pump from low temperature sources such as aerobically treated slurry, ground water and exhaust air.

Alternative non-fossil fuels include biogas and straw. Biogas production by anaerobic digestion of slurry is expensive in capital and is only feasible where the slurry must be treated for other reasons, such as odour control. Heat production from straw may be economical where the straw is available at low cost and simple stoking aids (e.g. existing tractor fore-loaders) are used.

Fail-safe equipment to protect stock in the event of forced ventilation system breakdown must be carefully designed and installed to be reliable. Methods are available to suit the range of ventilation and housing systems. Failure of natural ventilation systems is less likely to cause problems, and indications to the stockman of abnormal temperature conditions should be sufficient to prevent loss of stock.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Advisory and Development Service. 1985. Straw as a fuel for heating greenhouses. Booklet 2386. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.Google Scholar
Electricity Council. 1984. Heat pumps and heat recovery techniques in agriculture and horticulture. Technical Information AGR-10.Google Scholar
Electricity Council. 1986. Pig creep heating. Technical Information AGR 7–2.Google Scholar
Askestad, E. O. and Henriksen, J. E. 1985. Heat exchangers in animal rooms — evaluation of corrosion problems. Report, Agricultural University of Norway Institutt for Bygningsteknikk Report, No. 211.Google Scholar
Baines, S., Svoboda, J. F., Evans, M. R. and Martin, N. J. 1986. A computer program for calculation of the extractable heat from aerobic treatment of animal wastes. Journal ofAgricultural Engineering Research 34: 133140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, S. H. 1984. Intensive Pig Production, Environmental Management and Design. Granada Technical Books, London.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. 1975. Waste heat recovery in piggeries — the possibilities. Farm Buildings Progress No. 41, 1720.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. 1981. Ventilation and temperature control criteria for pigs. In Environmental Aspects of Housing for Animal Production (ed. Clark, J. A.), pp. 197216. Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. M. 1983. Design temperatures for the UK. Farm Buildings Progress No. 74, pp. 57.Google Scholar
Commission Internationale du Genic Rural. 1984. Report of the Working Group on Climatisation of Animal Houses. Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Friman, R. 1984. Monitoring aerobic digesters on farms. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 29: 357365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A. D. 1984. Extraction of energy from an anaerobic farm waste lagoon. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 29: 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneeshaw, A. 1986. Economy 7 electric storage boiler for creep heating. Pig Unit Newsletter, National Agricultural Centre, No. 18.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, A. L. 1986. Kennelled flat decks to improve the environment for 3 week weaned pigs. Proceedings of the Agricultural Engineering Conference, Noordwijkerhout.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. P. 1986. Firing boilers and furnaces with non-fossil fuels. Agricultural Engineer 41: (1), 1727.Google Scholar
Neukermans, G., Biest, W. Vander and Debruyckere, M. 1984. Evaluation of heat pump applications in animal housing. In Results of Pig Research. Institute for the Encouragement of Scientific Research in Industry and Agriculture, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Ridgeon, R. F. 1984. Pig Management Scheme — Results. University of Cambridge, Agricultural Economics Unit.Google Scholar
Wood, J. L. 1979. Waste heat recovery in piggeries. Agricultural Engineer 34: (1), 2022.Google Scholar