Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:39:34.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional needs of sheep in the hills and uplands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. A. Milne
J. A. Milne*
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
Get access

Abstract

Current knowledge of the potential nutrient supply that can be derived from indigenous and sown pasture is described and related to classically derived nutrient requirements. From this information, nutrient deficits can be identified for specific times in the ewe's cycle of production. Whilst nutrient deficits have been clearly identified in late pregnancy and early lactation, responses to nutrients and nutrient supply from autumn pasture have not yet been adequately described for the ewe over the mating period.

Nutrient deficits can be met by a combination of tissue catabolism and the provision of supplementary feeding. The dearth of knowledge of the factors influencing tissue catabolism and of the effects of supplementary feeding on herbage intake limits quantification of the amount and type of supplementary feeding to offer.

The principles concerning supplementary feeding in late pregnancy in some circumstances still require elucidation because of the interactions between mid- and late-pregnancy nutrition and this will be illustrated with reference to sheep grazing a predominantly heather hill. However, the principles governing supplementary feeding in early lactation are relatively well understood in relation to sown pastures below 4 cm in sward surface height and these are outlined. Information on the relative importance of milk and herbage in the diet of the lamb to weaning is discussed. The dependence of one part of the annual cycle on the nutrition in other parts of the cycle is stressed.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 10: Hill and Upland Livestock Production , 1985 , pp. 39 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. H., Common, T. G. and Smith, H. K. 1985. The voluntary intake and in vivo digestibility of herbage harvested from indigenous hill plant communities. Grass and Forage Sci. In press.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Terry, R. A., Cammell, S. B. and Wallace, A. S. 1978. The digestion of spring and autumn harvested perennial ryegrass by sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 90: 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bircham, J. S. 1981. Herbage growth and utilisation under continuous stocking management. PhD Thesis, Univ. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J. and McDonald, T. 1982. A note on the effects of body fatness and level of food intake on the rate of fat loss in lactating ewes. Anim. Prod. 34: 355–358.Google Scholar
Davis, S. R., Rattray, P. V., Petch, M. E. and Duganzich, D. M. 1981. Interrelationships of placental development with nutrition in pregnancy and lamb birth weight. Proc. NZ Soc. Anim. Prod. 44: 218–223.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Milne, J. A., Lamb, C. S., McCormack, H. A. and Spence, A. M. 1985. The effect of supplementation on non-ammonia N flows at the abomasum of lactating grazing ewes. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 44: 63A.Google Scholar
Eadie, J. 1967. The nutrition of grazing hill sheep; utilisation of hill pastures. HFRO 4th Rep. 1966-7, pp. 38–45.Google Scholar
Girard, J., Pintado, E. and Ferre, P. 1979. Fuel metabolism in the mammalian foetus. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochem. Biophys. 19(1B): 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. 1983. The influence of nutrition on the reproductive performance of ewes. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 99–110. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Hill Farming Research Organisation. 1983. Biennial Report 1982-83.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1985. The control of herbage intake in the grazing ruminant. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 44: 339–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, J. and Grant, S. A. 1981. Grazing animals and forage resources in the hills and uplands. Proc. Occ. Symp. No. 12, Brit. Grassld Soc, Edinburgh 1980, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R., Demarouilly, C. and Dulphy, J. P. 1974. The voluntary intake of forages. Proc. 5th General meeting, European Grassld Fed., Uppsala, pp. 98–106.Google Scholar
Lippert, M. 1985. Aspects of feeding the hill ewe during pregnancy. PhD Thesis, Univ. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Macrae, J. C., Milne, J. A., Wilson, S. and Spence, A. M. 1979. Nitrogen digestion in sheep given poor quality indigenous hill herbage. Brit. J. Nutr. 112: 525–534.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W. and Milne, J. A. 1983. The use of 3-hydroxybutyrate concentration in plasma to describe the degree of energy undernourishment of the ewe in late pregnancy. Anim. Prod. 36: 543. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W. and Lamb, C. S. 1982. The effect of supplementary starch and urea on the digestion of a heather-based diet by sheep. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production (ed. Thomson, D. J. et al.), pp. 149–150. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc Anim. Prod. No. 6.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W. and Lamb, C. S. 1984. The possible use of n-alkanes in herbage as indigestible faecal markers. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 43: 39A.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. J. 1983. Nutritional and placental determinants of foetal growth rate in sheep and consequences for the new-born lamb. Br. Vet. J. 139: 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A. 1984. The effects of season and age of stand on the nutritive value of heather (Calluna vulgaris, L. Hull) to sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 83: 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A., Bagley, L. and Grant, S. A. 1979. Effect of season and level of grazing on the utilisation of heather by sheep. 2. Diet selection and intake by sheep. Grass and Forage Sci. 34: 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. and Souter, W. 1981. Effect of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Anim. Prod. 32: 185–195.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Sibbald, A. M., Lamb, C. S., McCormack, H. A. and Lees, J. A. 1985. The herbage intake of ewes grazing perennial ryegrass swards and when given supplements during lactation and in the autumn. Grazing Symposium Brit. Grassld Soc. Nov. 1985. In press.Google Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Trigo, T. E. and Ulrich, C. F. 1980. Energy exchanges in twin-pregnant ewes. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Mount, L. E.), pp. 325–328. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1978. Responses of the lactating ewe to variation in energy and protein intake. In Milk Production in the Ewe (ed. Boyazoglu, J. G. and Treacher, T. T.), pp. 53–65. EAAP Publ. No. 23.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1982. Pregnancy. In Sheep and Goat Production, Volume CI (ed. Coop, I. E.), pp. 103–118. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1983. Nutrition of the pregnant ewe. In Sheep Production (ed. Harcsign, W.), pp. 111–131. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. 1971. Relationships between energy intake and productivity in hill sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russel, A. J. F. 1978. The use of measurements of energy status in pregnant ewes. In The Use of Blood Metabolites in Animal Production, pp. 31–40. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 1.Google Scholar
Teleni, E., Rowe, J. B. and Croker, K. P. 1985. Increased ovulation rates in ewes given intravenous infusions of energy yielding substrates. Proc. Nutr. Soc. Aust. 9: 158.Google Scholar
White, I. R., Russel, A. J. F. and Fowler, D. O. 1984. Real-time ultrasonic scanning in the diagnosis of pregnancy and the determination of foetal numbers in sheep. Vet. Rec. 115: 140–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed