Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-6djgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-10T23:46:36.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of the coconut flat moth (Agonoxena argaula Meyr.) and its allies, including a new species (Lepidoptera, Agonoxenidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. D. Bradley
J. D. Bradley
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Taxonomic characters of the adult, pupa and larva of the coconut flat moth, Agonoxena argaula Meyr., are compared with those of the three other known species comprising the family Agonoxenidae, and keys to the species are provided. One new species, A. phoenicia, is described from northern Queensland. The systematic position of the family and the generic status of the four species are discussed. Although differences of possible taxonomic importance have been noted, the species are considered sufficiently homogeneous to allow assignment to the single genus Agonoxena Meyr. Haemolytis miniana Meyr. is transferred to Agonoxena, and Haemolytis Meyr. is suppressed as a junior synonym.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 453 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dumbleton, L. J. (1954). A list of insect pests recorded in South Pacific territories.— Tech. Pap. S. Pacif. Comm. no. 79, p. 100.Google Scholar
Hinckley, A. D. (1961). Insects on young coconut palms in Fiji.—Agric. J. Fiji 31 pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E. (1946). On the homology and nomenclature of the setae of lepidopterous larvae, with some notes on the phylogeny of the Lepidoptera.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 97 pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E. (1948). The dorsal cranial areas of caterpillars.—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (11) 14 (1947) pp. 843–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyrick, E. (1921). Exot. Microlep. 2 pp. 471–472.Google Scholar
Meyrick, E. (1926). Exot. Microlep. 3 pp. 245–246.Google Scholar
O'connor, B. A. (1949). Some insect pests of Tonga.—Agric. J. Fiji 20 p. 49.Google Scholar
O'connor, B. A. (1957). Entomological notes.—Agric. J. Fiji 28 pp. 79–81.Google Scholar
O'connor, B. A. (1960). A decade of biological control work in Fiji.—Agric. J. Fiji 30 p. 50.Google Scholar
Paine, R. W. (1961). Search for an insect parasite on the Northern Bangalow Palm.—N. Qd Nat. 29 no. 130 pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Risbec, J. (1931). Note sur un parasite du cocotier en Nouvelle Calédonie (Agonoxena sp.).—Rev. Path. vég. 18 pp. 217–219.Google Scholar
Simmonds, H. W. (1938). Coconut pests and diseases in Melanesia and Southern Polynesia.—Bull. Dep. Agric. Fiji no. 20 p. 18.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. (1952). Notes on the life-history of the coconut leaf moth, Agonoxena argaula Meyr.—Agric. J. Fiji 23 pp. 106–107.Google Scholar
Swezey, O. H. (1946). Insects of Guam—II.—Bull. Bishop Mus., Honolulu no. 189 p. 212.Google Scholar
Tjoa, Tjen Mo (1953). Membrantas hama-hama kelapa dan kopra, pp. 103–104, figs. 85, 85a. Djakarta, Nordhoff-Kolff.Google Scholar
Weber, P. W. (1957). Agonoxena argaula Meyrick.—Proc. Hawaii, ent. Soc. 16 p. 194.Google Scholar