Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
2023.
Parasitoid Wasps of South East Asia.
p.
335.
Article contents
Study on mating ecology and sex ratio of three internally ovipositing fig wasps of Ficus curtipes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 July 2009
Abstract
Studies on mating ecology and sex allocation in fig-parasitizing wasps ovipositing from outside the fig have given valuable insights into known factors that are responsible for the theory of sex ratio. Similarly, internally ovipositing fig-parasitizing wasps and fig-pollinating wasps provide interesting models for comparative analysis. In addition to the fig-pollinating wasp Eupristina sp., we found that Ficus curtipes hosts two species of internally ovipositing fig-parasitizing wasps: D. yangi and Lipothymus sp. Eupristina sp. males showed less aggression. Eupristina sp. has wingless males that mate only within the natal patch, providing excellent examples of full local-mate competition. D. yangi males showed high levels of aggression and lethal combat. D. yangi has winged males but mate mostly within the natal patch. Only a few matings occur after male dispersal. Its sex ratio was lower than the prediction of partial local mate competition theory. Wingless male Lipothymus sp., which mate partly after dispersal, did not present fatal fight. Therefore, the mating behaviour of D. yangi and Lipothymus sp. did not follow predicted patterns, based on wing morph. The mating pattern of D. yangi and Lipothymus sp. should follow the partial local mate competition theory. Furthermore, there was not a significant correlation between the proportion of males and the proportion of fruit parasitized in both winged D. yangi males and wingless Lipothymus sp. males.
- Type
- Research Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
Cook, J.M., Compton, S.A., Herre, E.A. & West, S.A. (1997) Alternative mating tactics and extreme male dimorphism in fig wasps. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264, 747–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellowes, M.D.E., Compton, S.G. & Cook, J.M. (1999) Sex allocation and local mate competition in Old World non-pollinating fig wasps. Behavioral Ecological Sociobiology 46, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S.A. (1985) Hierarchial selection theory and sex ratios. On applying the theory, and a test with fig wasps. Evolution 39, 949–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galil, J. & Eisikowitch, D. (1969) Further studies on the pollination ecology of Ficus sycomorus L. (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 112, 1–13.Google Scholar
Greeff, J.M. & Ferguson, J.W.H. (1999) Mating ecology of the non-pollinating figs wasps of Ficus ingens. Animal Behaviour 57, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3, 193–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. (1979) Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. pp. 167–220 in Blum, M.S. & Blum, N.A. (Eds) Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insect. New York, USA, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, I.C.W. (1994) Sex ratio and mating structure in the parasitoid Hymenoptera. Oikos 69, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herre, E.A. (1985) Sex ratio adjustments in fig wasps. Science 228, 896–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herre, E.A. (1987) Optimality, plasticity, and selective regime in fig wasp sex ratios. Nature 329, 627–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herre, E.A., West, S.A., Cook, J.M., Compton, S.G. & Kjellberg, F. (1997) Fig-associated wasps: pollinators and parasites, sex-ratio adjustment and male polymorphism, population structure and its consequences. pp. 226–239 in Choe, J.C. (Ed.) The Evolution of Mating, Systems in Insects and Arthropods. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jousselin, E., Rasplus, J.Y. & Kjellberg, F. (2001) Shift to mutualism in parasitic lineages of the fig/fig wasp interaction. Oikos 94, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molbo, D., Machado, C.A., Sevenster, J.G., Keller, L. & Herre, E.A. (2003) Cryptic species of fig-pollinating wasps: Implications for the evolution of the fig-wasp mutualism, sex allocation, and precision of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 5867–5872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J.C., Dunn, A.M., Compton, S.G. & Hatcher, M.J. (2003) Foundress re-emergence and fig permeability in fig tree-wasp mutualisms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16, 1186–1195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, M.G. (1987) The closed environment of the fig receptacle and its influence on male conflict in the Old Word fig wasp, Philotrypesis pilosa. Animal Behaviour 35, 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Noort, S. & Compton, S.G. (1996) Convergent evolution of agaonine and sycoecine (Agaonidae, Chalcidoidea) head shape in response to the constraints of host fig morphology. Journal of Biogeography 23, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, S.L. (1991) Polymorphism and fighting in male fig wasps. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.Google Scholar
West, S.A. & Herre, E.A. (1998) Partial local mate competition and the sex ratio: A study on non-pollinating fig wasps. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11, 531–548.Google Scholar
West, S.A., Murray, M.G., Machado, C.A., Griffin, A.S. & Herre, E.A. (2001) Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives. Nature 409, 510–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, F.P., Peng, Y.Q., Guan, J.M. & Yang, D.R. (2008) A species of fig tree and three unrelated fig wasp pollinators. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10, 611–620.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by