Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Sino-Bodic

  • George Van Driem (a1)
Extract

In terms of number of speakers, Tibeto-Burman vies with Indo-European for the title of the world's largest language family. Yet by comparison little is known of its past. In linguistic terms, eastern Eurasia has always been much more of a terra incognita than western Eurasia. Speakers of Tibeto-Burman languages occupy a vast area in the heartland of eastern Eurasia, but Tibeto- Burman peoples are by no means the only inhabitants of the Orient. Yet at one time it was believed that virtually all languages spoken by what was impressionistically called ‘the Mongoloid race’ or ‘Mongolian races’ belonged to a vast language family known as Turanian. In the middle of the last century, Friedrich Max Müller, a celebrated champion of this theory, divided the languages of the Old World into three language families.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Avery, John. 1885. ‘The Tibeto-Burman group of languages’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, xvi, Appendix (Morning Session, Wednesday, July 8, 1885, New Haven, Connecticut), xviixix.
Bàrtoli, Matteo. 1942. ‘Figure similari e norme spaziali’, Bollettino dell' Atlante linguistico italiano, iii: 122.
Bàrtoli, Matteo. 1945. Saggi di linguistica spaziale. Torino: Vicenza Bona.
Baxter, William Hubbard, iii. 1980. ‘Some proposals on Old Chinese phonology’, van Coetsem, Frans and Waugh, Linda R. (ed.), Contributions to historical linguistics: issues and materials. Leiden: E. J. Brill: 133.
Baxter, William Hubbard, iii. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baxter, William Hubbard, iii. 1994. ‘Some phonological correspondences between Chinese and Tibeto-Burman’, in Kitamura, Hajime, Nishida, Tatsuo and Nagano, Yasuhiko (ed.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Ōsaka: Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics: 25–35.
Baxter, William Hubbard, iii. 1995. ‘Ongoing research: Old Chinese version 1.1’.Paper presented at the Old Chinese Seminar held at Leiden UniversityJuly 14th and 17th, 1995.
Beekes, Robert S.P. 1990. Vergelijkende taalwetenschap—tussen Sanskrit en Nederlands. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Het Spectrum.
Benedict, Paul King. 1939. ‘Semantic differentiation in Indo-Chinese’, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 4: 213229.
Benedict, Paul King. 1942. ‘Thai, Kadai, and Indonesia: A new alignment in southeastern Asia’, American Anthropologist, 44: 576601.
Benedict, Paul King. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: a conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benedict, Paul King. 1976. ‘Sino-Tibetan: another look’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 96/2: 167197.
Benedict, Paul King. 1991. ‘Austric: an “extinct” proto-language’, Davidson, Jeremy H. C. S. (ed.), Austroasiatic languages: essays in honour of H. L. Shorto. London: School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London: 711.
Benedict, Paul King. 1994. ‘Proto-Tibeto-Burman/Proto-Sino-Tibetan pronominals/pronominalization: a note on systemic dyschronicity’, in Kitamura, Hajime, Nishida, Tatsuo and Nagano, Yasuhiko (ed.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Ōsaka: Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics: 633636.
Blust, Robert. 1995. ‘An Austronesianist looks at Sino-Austronesian’, in Wang, (ed.), 283298.
Bodman, Nicholas Cleaveland. 1980. ‘Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: data towards establishing the nature of the relationship’, in van Coetsem, Frans and Waugh, Linda R. (eds.), Contributions to historical linguistics: issues and materials. Leiden: E. J. Brill: 34199.
Dwight, Bolinger. 1975. Aspects of language (second ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Bopp, Franz. 1816. Ueber das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache, nebst Episoden des Ramajan und Mahabharat in genauen metrischen Uebersetzungen aus dem Originaltexte und einigen Abschnitten aus den Veda's, Frankfurt am Main: Die Andreäische Buchhandlung.
Bradley, David. 1994a. ‘Tibeto-Burman’, in Mosely, Christopher and Asher, R. E. (ed.), Atlas of the world's languages. London: Routledge: 168181.
Bradley, David. 1994b. ‘The subgrouping of Proto-Tibeto-Burman’, in Kitamura, Hajime, Nishida, Tatsuo and Nagano, Yasuhiko (ed.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Ōsaka: Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics: 5978.
Brown, N. 1837. ‘Comparison of Indo-Chinese languages’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 6/2: 10231038.
Burling, Robert. 1983. ‘The Sal languages’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 7/2: 132.
Chalmers, John. 1866. The origin of the Chinese: an attempt to trace the connection of the Chinese with Western nations in their religion, superstitions, arts, language and traditions. Hong Kong: De Souza & Co.
Civil, Miguel. 1973. ‘The Sumerian Writing System: Some Problems’, Orientalia, New Series 42: 2134.
Coblin, Weldon South. 1986. A Sinologist's handlist of Sino-Tibetan lexical comparisons. (Monumenta Serica Monograph Series, xviii.) Nettetal: Steyler Verlag.
Coblin, Weldon South. 1995. ‘Review article: William H. Baxter, A handbook of Old Chinese phonology’, Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies, xliii: 509519.
Coblin, Weldon South and Norman, Jerry L.. 1995. ‘A new approach to Chinese historical linguistics’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 115/4: 576584.
Cœdès, Georges. 1948. ‘Les langues de l'lndochine’, Conférences de l'Institut de Linguistique de l'Université de Paris viii (Années 19401948): 6381.
Conrady, August. 1896. Eine indochinesische Causativ-Denominate-Bildung und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Tonaccenten: Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Grammatik der indochinesischen Sprachen, insonderheit des Tibetischen, Barmanischen, Siamesischen und Chinesischen. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.
Conrady, August. 1916. ‘Eine merkwürdige Beziehung zwischen den austrischen und den indochinesischen Sprachen’, Aufsätze zur Kultur-und Sprachgeschichte vornehmlich des Orients: Ernst Kuhn zum 70. Geburtstage am 7. Februar 1916 gewidmet von Freunden und Schülern. München: Verlag von M. & H. Marcus, 475504.
Conrady, August. 1922. ‘Neue austrisch-indochinesische Parallelen’, Asia Major: Hirth Anniversary Volume. London: Robsthan and Company: 2366.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1955. ‘La geografía lingüística’, Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias (Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo), 14: 2969.
Courant, Maurice. 1903. ‘Note sur l'existence, pour certains caracteres chinois, de deux lectures, distinguées par les finales k-ṅ, t-n, p-m’, Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, xii: 6772.
De Lacouperie, Terrien. 1887. ‘The languages of China before the Chinese’, Transactions of the Philological Society (London), 1885–87: 394538.
Diffloth, Gérard. 1994. ‘The lexical evidence for Austric, so far’, Oceanic Linguistics, 33/2: 309321.
Downer, G. B. 1959. ‘Derivation by tone change on Classical Chinese’, BSOAS, 22/2: 258290.
Driem, George van. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. West Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Driem, George van. 1990. ‘The fall and rise of the phoneme /r/ in Eastern Kiranti: sound change in Tibeto-Burman’, BSOAS, 53/1: 8386.
Driem, George van. 1991. Guide to official Dzongkha romanization. Thimphu: Royal Government of Bhutan.
Driem, George van. 1993a. A grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Driem, George van. 1993b. ‘The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system’, BSOAS, 56/2: 292334.
Driem, George van. 1995a. ‘Black Mountain conjugational morphology, Proto-Tibeto-Burman morphosyntax. and the linguistic position of Chinese’, in Nishi, Yoshio, Matisoff, James Alan and , Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.), New horizons in Tibeto-Burman morphosyntax. (Senri Ethnological Studies, 41.) Ōsaka: National Museum of Ethnology: 229259.
Driem, George van. 1995b. Een eerste grammaticale verkenning van het Bumthang, een taal van Midden-Bhutan—met een overzicht van de talen en volkeren van Bhutan. Leiden: Centrum voor Niet-Westerse Studiën.
Driem, George van. (forthcoming a.) ‘Neolithic correlates of ancient Tibeto-Burman migrations’, in Blench, Roger (ed.). London: Routledge.
Driem, George van. (forthcoming b.) ‘The Toto language of the Bhutanese duars’.
Finck, Franz Nikolaus. 1909. Die Sprachstämme des Erdkreises. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
Forbes, C. J. F. S. 1878. ‘On Tibeto-Burman languages’, JRAS, N.S. x: 210227.
Forbes, C. J. F. S. 1882. Comparative grammar of the languages of Further India: a fragment and other essays. London: W. H. Allen and Company.
Forchhammer, Emile. 1882. ‘Indo-Chinese languages’, Indian Antiquary, xi: 177189.
Gernet, Jacques. 1984. ‘La vie et l'œuvre’, in Hommage à Henri Maspéro 1883–1945. Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac: 1524.
Gong, Yushu, 1993. Studien zur Bildung und Entwicklung der Keilschriftzeichen. (Schriftenreihe Antiquates, Bd. 7.) Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovaĉ.
Green, M. W. 1991. ‘Early cuneiform’, in Senner, Wayne M. (ed.), The origins of writing. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 4357.
Grierson, George Abraham (ed.). 1909. Linguistic Survey of India (Vol. iii. Part I, Tibeto-Burman family: Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects and the North Assam group). Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India.
Grube, Wilhelm. 1881. Die sprachgeschichtliche Stellung des Chinesischen. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.
Hall, Robert A. Jr.. 1980. ‘The gradual decline of case in Romance substantives’, van Coetsem, Frans and Waugh, Linda R. (ed.), Contributions to historical linguistics: issues and materials. Leiden: E. J. Brill: 261269.
Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1954. ‘De l'origine des tons en viētnamien’, Journal Asiatique, 242: 6882.
Hodgson, Brian Houghton. 1849. ‘On the Aborigines of Nor-Eastern India’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, cciii (May 1849): 451460.
Hunter, William W. 1868. A comparative dictionary of the non-Aryan languages of India and High Asia. London: Trübner and Company.
Jaxontov, Sergej Evgenieviĉ. 1959. ‘Fonetika kitajskogo jazyka I tysjaĉeletija do n.è. (sistema finalej)’, Problemy Vostokovedenija, 2: 137147.
Jaxontov, Sergej Evgenieviĉ. 1965. Drevnekitajskij jazyk. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’.
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1920. ‘Le proto-chinois, langue flexionnelle’, Journal Asiatique, xie Serie, Tome xv: 205232.
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1923. Analytic dictionary of Chinese and Sino-Japanese. Paris: Geuthner.
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1933. ‘Word families in Chinese’, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 5: 9120.
Karlgren, Bernahrd. 1957. Grammata Serica Recensa ( = Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 29: 1332).
Keping ( = von Kepping), Borisovna, Ksenija. 1985. Tangutskij jazyk: morfologija. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’.
Keping ( = von Kepping), Borisovna, Ksenija. 1994. ‘The conjugation of the Tangut verb’, BSOAS, 57/2: 339346.
Klaproth, Julius. 1823. Asia Polyglotta. Paris: A. Schubart.
Krecher, Joachim. 1967. ‘Die sumerischen Texte in “syllabischer” Orthographie’, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 58: 1665.
Kuhn, Ernst. 1883. Ueber Herkunft und Sprache der transgangetischen Völker. Festrede zur Vorfeier des AHerhöchsten Geburts-und Namensfestes Seiner Majestät des Königs Ludwig II., gehalten in der öffentlichen Sitzung der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München am 25. Juli 1881. München: Verlag der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie.
Kuhn, Ernst. 1889. ‘Beiträge zur Sprachenkunde Hinterindiens’ (Sitzung vom 2. März 1889), Sitzungsberichte der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (München), Philosophisch-philologische Classe ii: 189236.
Labat, René. 1948. Manuel d'épigraphie akkadienne (signes, syllabaire. idéogrammes). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
Lepsius, . 1861. ‘Über die Umschrift und Lautverhältnisse einiger hinterasiatischer Sprachen, namentlich der Chinesischen und der Tibetischen’. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin aus dem Jahre 1860, 449496.
Leyden, J. 1808. ‘On the languages and literature of the Indo-Chinese nations’, Asiatic Researches, x: 158289.
Li, Fang Kuei [ = Lî Fānggui]. 1974. ‘Studies on Archaic Chinese’ (tr. by Mattos, G. L.), Monumenta Serica, xxxi (19741975): 219287.
Li, Fang Kuei [ = Lî Fānggui]. 1977. A Handbook of comparative Tai (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, no. 15.) Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Li, Fang Kuei [ = Lî Fānggui]. 1983. ‘Archaic Chinese’, in Keightley, David N. (ed.), The origins of Chinese civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press: 393408.
Li, Paul Jenkuei. 1995. ‘Is Chinese genetically related to Austronesian’, in Wang, (ed.), 93112.
John, Logan. 1858. ‘The West-Himalaic or Tibetan tribes of Asam, Burma and Pegu’, Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia (Singapore), ii/1: 68114.
Lubotsky, Alexander, (forthcoming). ‘Tocharian loan words in Old Chinese: Chariots, chariot gear and town building’.
Mainwaring, Colonel George Byres. 1876. A grammar of the Róng (Lepcha) language, as it exists in the Dorjiling and Sikim Hills. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.
Mainwaring, Colonel George Byres. 1889. Dictionary of the Lepcha language (revised and completed by Albert Grünwedel). Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.
Maspéro, Henri Paul Gaston. 1912. ‘Études sur la phonétique historique de la langue annamite’, Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient, xii/1: 1127.
Maspéro, Henri Paul Gaston. 1948 (posthumous). ‘Notes sur la morphologie du tibéto-birman et du munda’, Bulletin de la Sociétê Linguistique de Paris, xliv: 155185.
Maspéro, Henri Paul Gaston. 1952 (posthumous). ‘Langues de l'Asie du sud-est’, in (ed.) Meillet, Antoine and Cohen, Marcel, Les langues du monde. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: 523644.
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1994. ‘Manner vs. place of articulation in the Kiranti initial stops’, in Kitamura, Hajime, Nishida, Tatsuo and Nagano, Yasuhiko (eds.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Ōsaka: Organizing Committee of the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, 5978.
Miller, Roy Andrew. 1988. ‘The Sino-Tibetan hypothesis’, Bulletin of the School of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, lix/2: 509540.
Müller, Friedrich Max. 1855. Languages of the seat of war in the East, with a survey of the three families of language, Semitic, Arian, and Turanian (frontispiece title: Max Mütter's Survey of languages) (second ed.) London: Williams and Norgate.
Müller, Friedrich Max. 1881. Selected essays on language, mythology and religion (2 vols.). London: Longmans, Green and Company.
Müller, Friedrich Max. 1901 (posthumous). My autobiography. London: Longmans, Green and Company.
Pott, August Friedrich. 1887. Zur Litteratur der Sprachenkunde Europas. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1962. ‘The consonantal system of Old Chinese’, Asia Major (New Series) ix/1: 58144, (2) 206–265.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1973a. ‘Some further evidence regarding Old Chinese -s and its time of disappearance’, BSOAS 36/2: 368373.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1973b. ‘Some new hypotheses concerning word families in Chinese’, Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1: 111125.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1984. Middle Chinese: a study in historical phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1991. Lexicon of reconstructed pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Earlv Mandarin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. ‘Comments from Pulleyblank’, in Wang, (ed.), 325335.
Rask, Rasmus Kristian. 1834 (posthumous). Samlede tildels forhen utrykte afhandlinger. (2 vols.) Copenhagen: det Poppske Bogtrykkeri.
Reid, Lawrence A. 1994. ‘Morphological evidence for Austric’, Oceanic Linguistics, 33/2: 323344.
Reiner, Erica. 1973. ‘How we can read cuneiform texts’, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, xxv/1: 358.
Sagart, Laurent. 1990. ‘Chinese and Austronesian are genetically related’.Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics (5 to 7 October), University of Texas at Arlington.
Sagart, Laurent. 1994. ‘Proto-Austronesian and Old Chinese evidence for Sino-Austronesian’, Oceanic Linguistics 33/2: 271308.
Sagart, Laurent. 1995a. ‘Some remarks on the ancestry of Chinese’, in Wang, (ed.), 195223.
Sagart, Laurent. 1995b. ‘Comments from Sagart’, in Wang, (ed.), 337372.
Sapir, Edward. 1978 [first published 1921]. Language: an introduction to the study of speech. London: Granada Publishing.
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1808. Ueber die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier: Ein Beitrag zur Begruendung der Alterthumskunde, nebst metrischen Uebersetzungen indischer Gedichte. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.
Schlegel, Gustave. 1902. Siamese studies. (T' oung-pao, New Series II, Vol. ii, Supplement.) Leiden.
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
Schmidt, Wilhelm. 1906. ‘Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Volkern Zentral-Asiens und Austronesiens’, Archiv für Anthropologie, Neue Folge, v, 59109.
Schmidt, Wilhelm. 1926. Die Sprachfamilien und Sprachenkreise der Erde. [2 vols., the second of which is an atlas]. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Schmidt, Wilhelm. 1930. ‘Die Beziehungen der austrischen Sprachen zum Japanischen’, Wiener Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte und Linguistik, Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Völkerkunde an der Universität Wien, i, 239251.
Schott, Wilhelm. 1856. ‘Uuml;ber die sogenanten indo-chinesischen Sprachen insonderheit das Siamische’, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin aus dem Jahre 1856 (philosophisch-historische Klasse), 161179.
Schüssler, Axel. 1976. Affixes in Proto-Chinese. (Münchener Ostasiatische Studien, 18.) Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Schüssler, Axel. 1987. A dictionary of Early Zhou Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Shafer, Robert. 1954. ‘The linguistic position of Dwags’, Oriens, Zeitschrift der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Orientforschung, 7: 348356.
Shafer, Robert. 1955. ‘Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages’, Word, Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York, 11: 94111.
Shafer, Robert. 1974. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Shaughnessy, Edward L. 1988. ‘Historical perspectives on the introduction of the chariot into China’, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 48/1: 189237.
Simon, Walter. 1929. ‘Tibetisch-chinesische Wortgleichungen, ein Versuch’, Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen an der Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin, xxxii/1: 157228.
Starostin, Sergej Anatol'eviĉ. 1989. Rekonstrukcija drevnekitajskoj fonologiĉeskoj sistemy. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’.
Starostin, Sergej Anatol'eviĉ. 1994. ‘The reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti’.Paper presented at the 27éme Congrés International sur les Langues et la Linguistique Sino-Tibétaines, Centre International d'Études Pédagogiques à Sévres,14 octobre 1994.
Starostin, Sergej Anatol'eviĉ. 1995a. ‘Old Chinese vocabulary: A historical perspective’, in Wang, (ed.), 225251.
Starostin, Sergej Anatol'eviĉ. 1995b. ‘Comments from Starostin’, in Wang, (ed.), 393404.
Thomsen, Marie-Louise. 1984. The Sumerian language, an introduction to its history and grammatical structure. (Mesopotamia, Copenhagen Studíes in Assyriology, 10.) København: Akademisk Forlag.
Thurgood, Graham. 1985. ‘Pronouns, verbal agreement systems, and the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burmana’, in Thurgood, Graham, Matisoff, James Alan and Bradley, David (ed.), Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: the state of the art—papers presented to Paul K. Benedict for his list birthday. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics: 376400.
Wang, William S-Y. (ed.). 1995. The ancestry of the Chinese language. (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, no. 8.) Berkeley, California.
Wulff, K. 1934. Chinesiscli und Tai: Sprachvergleichende Untersuchungen. (Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser, xx, 3.) Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.
Xylander, Joseph Ritter von. 1835. Die Sprache der Albanesen oder Schkipetaren. Frankfurt am Main: Die Andreäische Buchhandlung.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
  • ISSN: 0041-977X
  • EISSN: 1474-0699
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-the-school-of-oriental-and-african-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed