Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Darling, Linda T. 2008. Political Change and Political Discourse in the Early Modern Mediterranean World. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 505.


    Haneda, Masashi 1989. The evolution of the Safavid royal guard. Iranian Studies, Vol. 22, Issue. 2-3, p. 57.


    Banani, Amin 1978. Reflections on the social and economic structure of Safavid Persia at its zenith. Iranian Studies, Vol. 11, Issue. 1-4, p. 83.


    Savory, Roger 1968. Notes on the Safavid state. Iranian Studies, Vol. 1, Issue. 3, p. 96.


    ×
  • Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Volume 23, Issue 1
  • February 1960, pp. 91-105

The Principal Offices of the Ṣafawid State During the Reign of Isma'īl I (907–30/1501–24)

Abstract

Isma'īl's defeat by the Ottomans at Chāldirān—his first defeat—destroyed the legend of his invincibility. This legend was based on his pretensions to a quasi-divine status, and, after Chāldirān, the qizilbāsh, although they continued to pay lip-service to this idea, showed clearly by their actions that they no longer accorded any special reverence to the person of their ruler. They had lost their faith in Isma'īl's supernatural powers, and this impaired their fundamental relationship with him. Although in theory Isma'īl was still the murshid-i kāmil, and the qizilbāsh were his murīas, the qizilbāsh were no longer prepared to follow him with the fanatical devotion and indifference to personal danger which had been noted by a Venetian merchant in 1518, only two years before Chāldirān. Once the religious bond between Isma'īl and the qizilbāsh had been broken, and their relationship reduced in practice (though not in theory) to a secular plane, it was but a short step to disobedience to his commands and an open flouting of his authority, especially as this authority was further reduced by his virtual withdrawal from the conduct of state affairs and by the fact that after Chāldirān he ceased personally to lead his troops into battle. The oppressive rule of Amīr Khan Turkmān in Khurāsān during 922–8/1516–22, and his arrogant disregard of Isma'īl's express commands, constituted a challenge to Isma'īl's authority which he seemed reluctant or unable to meet.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
  • ISSN: 0041-977X
  • EISSN: 1474-0699
  • URL: /core/journals/bulletin-of-the-school-of-oriental-and-african-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×