Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

No Character or Personality

Abstract:
Abstract:

Solomon argues that, although recent research in social psychology has important implications for business ethics, it does not undermine an approach that stresses virtue ethics. However, he underestimates the empirical threat to virtue ethics, and his a priori claim that empirical research cannot overturn our ordinary moral psychology is overstated. His appeal to seemingly obvious differences in character traits between people simply illustrates the fundamental attribution error. His suggestion that the Milgram and Darley and Batson experiments have to do with such character traits as obedience and punctuality cannot help to explain the relevant differences in the way people behave in different situations. His appeal to personality theory fails, because, as an intellectual academic discipline, personality theory is in shambles, mainly because it has been concerned with conceptions of personality rather than with what is true about personality. Solomon’s rejection of Doris’s claims about the fragmentation of character is at odds with the received view in social psychology. Finally, he is mistaken to think that rejecting virtue ethics implies rejecting free will and moral responsibility.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Darley J. M. 1973. “From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27: 1008.
Dennett D. C. 1981. Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Doris J. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fodor J. A. 1975. The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Crowell.
Fodor J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Funder D. C. 2001. “Personality.” Annual Review of Psychology 52: 197221.
Gilovich T. 1993. How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: The Free Press.
Harman G. 1998–99. “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99: 31531.
Harman G. 1999–2000. “The Nonexistence of Character Traits.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100: 2236.
Isen A. M., and Levin P. F. 1972. “Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21: 3848.
Kunda Z. 1999. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Latané B., and Darley J. M. 1970. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Merritt M. 2000. “Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3: 36583.
Milgram S. 1974. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper and Row.
Miller G. A., and Cantor N. 1982. Review of Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. In Social Cognition 1: 8393.
Nisbett R. 1998. “Essence and Accident.” In Attribution and Social Interaction: The Legacy of Edward E. Jones, ed. Darley J. M. and Cooper J. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Solomon R. 2003. “Victims of Circumstances? A Defense of Virtue Ethics in Business.” Business Ethics Quarterly 13(1): 4362.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 244 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.