Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 34
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kim, Tae Wan and Donaldson, Thomas 2016. Rethinking Right: Moral Epistemology in Management Research. Journal of Business Ethics,

    Miller, Christian B. 2016. The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism.

    Abela, Andrew V. and Shea, Ryan 2015. Avoiding the Separation Thesis While Maintaining a Positive/Normative Distinction. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 131, Issue. 1, p. 31.

    Alzola, Miguel 2015. Virtuous Persons and Virtuous Actions in Business Ethics and Organizational Research. Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 25, Issue. 03, p. 287.

    Messina, J. P. and Surprenant, Chris W. 2015. Situationism and the Neglect of Negative Moral Education. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 835.

    Murphy, James Bernard 2015. Does Habit Interference Explain Moral Failure?. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 255.

    Ferrero, Ignacio and Sison, Alejo José G. 2014. A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980-2011). Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 375.

    Rowden, Trampas J. Harris, Steven M. and Wickel, Katharine 2014. Understanding Humility and Its Role in Relational Therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, Vol. 36, Issue. 3, p. 380.

    Alfano, Mark 2013. Book Reviews. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 671.

    de Bruin, Boudewijn 2013. Epistemic Virtues in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 113, Issue. 4, p. 583.

    Mower, Deborah S. 2013. Situationism and Confucian Virtue Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 113.

    Simpson, Thomas W. 2013. Trustworthiness and Moral Character. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 543.

    Swaine, Lucas 2013. Moral Character for Political Leaders: A Normative Account. Res Publica, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 317.

    Kristjánsson, Kristján 2012. Situationism and the Concept of a Situation. European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 20, p. E52.

    Alfano, Mark 2011. Explaining Away Intuitions About Traits: Why Virtue Ethics Seems Plausible (Even if it Isn’t). Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 121.

    April, Kurt Peters, Kai Locke, Kirsten and Mlambo, Caroline 2011. Ethical Leadership.

    Chen, Stephen 2011. Ethical Leadership.

    Hartman, Edwin M. 2011. Virtue, Profit, and the Separation Thesis: An Aristotelian View. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 99, Issue. 1, p. 5.

    April, Kurt Peters, Kai Locke, Kirsten and Mlambo, Caroline 2010. Ethics and leadership: Enablers and stumbling blocks. Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 152.

    Chen, Stephen 2010. Bolstering unethical leaders: The role of the media, financial analysts and shareholders. Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 200.


No Character or Personality


Solomon argues that, although recent research in social psychology has important implications for business ethics, it does not undermine an approach that stresses virtue ethics. However, he underestimates the empirical threat to virtue ethics, and his a priori claim that empirical research cannot overturn our ordinary moral psychology is overstated. His appeal to seemingly obvious differences in character traits between people simply illustrates the fundamental attribution error. His suggestion that the Milgram and Darley and Batson experiments have to do with such character traits as obedience and punctuality cannot help to explain the relevant differences in the way people behave in different situations. His appeal to personality theory fails, because, as an intellectual academic discipline, personality theory is in shambles, mainly because it has been concerned with conceptions of personality rather than with what is true about personality. Solomon’s rejection of Doris’s claims about the fragmentation of character is at odds with the received view in social psychology. Finally, he is mistaken to think that rejecting virtue ethics implies rejecting free will and moral responsibility.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. M. Darley 1973. “From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27: 1008.

J. Doris 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

D. C. Funder 2001. “Personality.” Annual Review of Psychology 52: 197221.

G. Harman 1998–99. “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99: 31531.

G. Harman 1999–2000. “The Nonexistence of Character Traits.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100: 2236.

A. M. Isen , and P. F. Levin 1972. “Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21: 3848.

M. Merritt 2000. “Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3: 36583.

G. A. Miller , and N. Cantor 1982. Review of Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. In Social Cognition 1: 8393.

R. Solomon 2003. “Victims of Circumstances? A Defense of Virtue Ethics in Business.” Business Ethics Quarterly 13(1): 4362.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *