Aquino, K., Tripp, T.M., & Bies, R.J. 2006. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3): 653–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. 1992. Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baxter, L.G. 2011. Capture in financial regulation: Can we channel it toward the common good. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 21: 175–200.
Baxter, L.G. 2012. Understanding regulatory capture: An academic perspective from the United States. In Pagliari, S. (Ed.), The making of good financial regulation: Towards a policy response to regulatory capture: 53–69. Guildford: Guildford House Publishing Ltd.
Braithwaite, J. 1999. A future where punishment is marginalized: Realistic or utopian? UCLA Law Review, 46: 1727–43.
Braithwaite, J. 2002. Restorative justice & responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braithwaite, J. 2003. Restorative justice and corporate regulation. In Braithwaite, E.G.M. & Kerner, H.-J. (Eds.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
Braithwaite, J. 2011. The essence of responsive regulation. University of British Columbia Law Review, 44(3): 475–520.
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Dirks, K.T., Lewicki, R.J., & Zaheer, A. 2009. Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34(1): 68–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2009.35713285
Glaser, B.G. 1978. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. 1998. Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. 2005. The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Goodstein, J., & Butterfield, K.D. 2009. Extending the horizon of business ethics: Restorative justice and the aftermath of unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3): 453–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201020330
Goulding, C. 2002. Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Greve, H.R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J.-E. 2010. Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1): 53–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654186
Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. 1998. Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hess, D., & Ford, C.L. 2008. Corporate corruption and reform undertakings: A new approach to an old problem. Cornell International Law Journal, 41: 307–46.
Holton, J.A. 2007. The coding process and its challenges. In Bryant, A. & Charmaz, K. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. 265–89. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Hughes, E.L., & Reynolds, L.A. 2009. Creative sentencing and environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 19(2): 105–37.
Livermore, M.A., & Revesz, R.L. 2012. Regulatory review, capture, and agency inaction. Georgetown Law Journal, 101: 1337–1427.
Locke, K. 2001. Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Mills, R.W. 2010. The promise of collaborative partnerships: Lessons from the Federal Aviation Administration. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
Nehme, M. 2005. Enforceable undertakings in Australia and beyond. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 18: 66–87.
Nehme, M. 2007. Enforceable undertakings: A new form of settlement to resolve alleged breaches of the law. University of Western Sydney Law Review, 11: 104–23.
Nehme, M. 2009. Monitoring compliance with enforceable undertakings. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 23: 76–102.
Nehme, M. 2010. Enforceable undertaking: A restorative sanction. Monash University Law Review, 36(2): 108–35.
Parker, C. 2002. The open corporation: Effective self-regulation and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, C., & Nielsen, V.L. 2011. Deterrence and the impact of calculative thinking on business compliance with competition and consumer regulation. Antitrust Bulletin, 56(2).377–426.
Parker, C. 1984. Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Basic Books.
Powell, B.H. 2001. Let’s be a little more creative: Creative sentencing in Alberta. Environmental Law Centre News Brief, 16(2): 1–5.
Reiss, D.R. 2012. The benefits of capture. Wake Forest Law Review, 47(3): 569–610.
Rhee, M., & Valdez, M.E. 2009. Contextual factors surrounding reputation damage with potential implications for reputation repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1): 146–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2009.35713324
Richards, L. 2005. Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Schwarcz, D. 2013. Preventing capture through consumer empowerment programs: Some evidence from insurance regulation. In Carpenter, D. & Moss, D. (Eds.), Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it: 365–96. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565875.019
Thaw, D. 2014. Enlightened regulatory capture. Washington Law Review, 89(2): 329–77.
Vaughan, D. 1983. Controlling unlawful organizational behavior: Social structure and corporate misconduct. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vaughan, D. 1990. Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle Challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2): 225–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393390 Vaughan, D. 1997. The trickle-down effect: Policy decisions, risky work, and the Challenger tragedy. California Management Review, 39: 80–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165888