Skip to main content Accessibility help

Talk Ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation

  • Cameron Sabadoz (a1) and Abraham Singer (a2)

Deliberative democratic theory, commonly used to explore questions of “political” corporate social responsibility (PCSR), has become prominent in the literature. This theory has been challenged previously for being overly sanguine about firm profit imperatives, but left unexamined is whether corporate contexts are appropriate contexts for deliberative theory in the first place. We explore this question using the case of Starbucks’ “Race Together” campaign to show that significant challenges exist to corporate deliberation, even in cases featuring genuinely committed firms. We return to the underlying social theory to show that this is not an isolated case: for-profit firms are predictably hostile contexts for deliberation, and significant normative and strategic problems can be expected should deliberative theory be imported uncritically to corporate contexts. We close with recent advances in deliberative democratic theory that might help update the PCSR project, and accommodate the application of deliberation to the corporate context, albeit with significant alterations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Talk Ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Talk Ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Talk Ain’t Cheap: Political CSR and the Challenges of Corporate Deliberation
      Available formats
Hide All
Austin, R. 2000. “Bad for business”: Contextual analysis, race discrimination, and fast food. The John Marshall Law Review, 34: 207243.
Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Steiner, J. 2010. Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1): 3263.
Banerjee, S. B. 2010. Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2): 265274.
Baur, D., & Arenas, D. 2014. The value of unregulated business-NGO interaction: A deliberative perspective. Business and Society, 53(2): 157186.
Baur, D., & Palazzo, G. 2011. The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4): 579604.
Berkowitz, J. 2015. This is what happens when you walk into Starbucks and talk to the barista about race. Fast Company, March 18.
Bohman, J. 1998. The coming of age of deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4): 400425.
Carr, A. 2015. The inside story of Starbucks’s Race Together campaign, no foam. Fast Company, June 15.
Chambers, S. 2003. Democratic deliberative theory. Annual review of political science, 6: 307326. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Chambers, S. 2004a. The politics of critical theory. In Rush, F. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to critical theory: 219247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chambers, S. 2004b. Behind closed doors: Publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(4): 389410.
Chambers, S. 2009. Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy? Political Theory, 37(3): 323350.
Connor, J. 2015. MSNBC panel on race gets painfully uncomfortable: ‘I’m actually black.’ Huffington Post, March 18.
Cooke, M. 2006. Re-presenting the good society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Djelic, M. L., & Etchanchu, H. 2015. Contextualizing corporate political responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in historical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2879-7
Driver, C., & Thompson, G. 2002. Corporate governance and democracy: The stakeholder debate revisited. Journal of Management and Governance, 6: 111130.
Dryzek, J. 2002. Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edward, P., & Willmott, H. 2008. Corporate citizenship: Rise or demise of a myth? Academy of Management Review, 33(3): 771773.
Ehrnström-Fuentes, M. 2016. Delinking legitimacies: A pluriversal perspective on political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3): 433462.
Elster, J. 1986. The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In Elster, J. & Hyland, A. (Eds.), Foundations of social choice theory: 103132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. 2013. The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 489505.
Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. 2015. Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17: 483509.
Fung, A. 2005. Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33: 397419.
Goodin, R. E. 2005. Sequencing deliberative moments. Acta Politica, 40: 182196.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. 1984a. The theory of communicative action volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. 1984b. The theory of communicative action volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Rehg, W. (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. 2001. The post-national constellation. Pensky, M. (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansmann, H. 1996. The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. 2001. The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89(2): 439468.
HBO. 2015. John Oliver – Starbucks’ Race Together. YouTube, March 23.
Hielscher, S., Beckmann, M., & Pies, I. 2014. Participation versus consent: Should corporations be run according to democratic principles? Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(4): 533563.
Hirschmann, A. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hussain, W., & Moriarty, J. 2016. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3027-8.
Jensen, M. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235256.
Jutten, T. 2013. Habermas and markets. Constellations, 20(4): 587603.
Kinderman, D. 2012. ‘Free us up so we can be responsible!’ The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1): 2957.
Kleinberg, S. 2015. Starbucks #RaceTogether campaign brews up bitter social media reaction. Chicago Tribune, March 18.
Knight, J., & Johnson, J. 2011. The priority of democracy: Political consequences of pragmatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kobrin, J. 2009. Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3): 349374.
Kohn, M. 2002. Language, power, and persuasion: Towards a critique of deliberative democracy. Constellations, 7(3): 408429.
Kuhn, T., & Deetz, S. 2008. Critical theory and corporate social responsibility: Can/should we get beyond cynical reasoning? In Crane, A., Matten, D., McWilliams, A., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mäkinen, J., & Kasanen, E. 2016. Boundaries between business and politics: A study on the division of moral labor. Journal of Business Ethics, 134: 103116.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Manin, B., & Marti, J. L. 2010. The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1): 64100.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. 2013. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Parkinson, J. & Mansbridge, J. (Eds.), Deliberative Systems: 110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matten, D., & Crane, A. 2005. Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30: 166179.
Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. 2012. Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3): 527556.
Moog, S., Spicer, A., & Böhm, S. 2015. The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 128: 469493.
Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2005. Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 429453.
Mutz, D. 2008. Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 521538.
Néron, P. Y. 2013. Toward a political theory of the business firm? A comment on ‘political CSR.’ Business Ethics Journal Review, 1(3).
Newman, K. 2000. No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city. New York: Vintage.
Noland, J. & Phillips, R. 2010. Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 3949.
Öberg, P. 2003. Does administrative corporatism promote trust and deliberation? Governance, 15(4): 455475.
Oosterhout, J. 2008. Transcending the confines of economic and political organization? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1): 3542.
Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. 2006. Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66: 7188.
Pierce, J. L., Neeley, G., & Budziak, J. 2008. Can deliberative democracy work in hierarchical organizations? Journal of Public Deliberation, 4(1): Article 14.
Pincione, G., & Tesón, F. R. 2006. Rational choice and democratic deliberation: A theory of discourse failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rasche, A., & Esser, D. 2006. From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 65: 251267.
Reuters, . 2015. Starbucks expands college tuition benefit for workers. Fortune, April 6.
Roe, M. 2000. Political preconditions to separating ownership from corporate control. Stanford Law Review, 53(3): 539606.
Sanders, L. 1997. Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3): 347354.
Santoro, M. A. 2010. Post-Westphalia and its discontents. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2): 285297.
Scherer, A. G., Baumann-Pauly, D., & Schneider, A. 2012. Democratizing corporate governance: Compensating for the democratic deficit of corporate political activity and corporate citizenship. Business and Society, 52(3): 473514.
Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 10961120.
Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. 2011. The new political role of business in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4): 899931.
Scherer, A., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. 2006. Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4): 505532.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. 2013. Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2): 259284.
Seidman, D. 2015. Dismantling the low-wage economy. Jacobin, September 2.
Shulman, G. 2008. American prophecy: Race and redemption in American political culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Somaiya, R. 2015. Starbucks ends conversation starters on race. New York Times, March 22.
Stahl, T. 2013. Habermas and the project of immanent critique. Constellations, 20(4): 533552.
Starbucks . 2015a. Starbucks global responsibility report. March 23.
Starbucks, . 2015b. What ‘Race Together’ means for Starbucks partners and customers. March 16.
Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571610.
Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. 2004. The corporate social objective reconsidered. Organization Science, 15(3): 350363.
Tolentino, J. 2015. How to talk about race with your Starbucks barista: A guide. Jezebel, March 17.
Walters, J. 2015. In one busy coffee shop, Starbucks race conversation gets off to a stuttering start. The Guardian, March 17.
Whelan, G. 2012. The political conception of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4): 709737.
Willke, H., & Willke, G. 2008. Corporate moral legitimacy and the legitimacy of morals: A critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 81: 2738.
Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, I. M. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5): 670690.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed