Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Understanding the Role of Moral Principles in Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective

  • Jeffery Smith and Wim Dubbink
Abstract:

Does effective moral judgment in business ethics rely upon the identification of a suitable set of moral principles? We address this question by examining a number of criticisms of the role that principles can play in moral judgment. Critics claim that reliance on principles requires moral agents to abstract themselves from actual circumstances, relationships and personal commitments in answering moral questions. This is said to enforce an artificial uniformity in moral judgment. We challenge these critics by developing an account of principle-based moral judgment that has been widely discussed by contemporary Kantian scholars. In so doing we respond to some basic problems raised by so-called “moral particularists” who voice theoretical objections to the role of principles as well as to contemporary business ethicists who have criticized principle-based moral judgment along similar lines. We conclude with some future areas of research.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Understanding the Role of Moral Principles in Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Understanding the Role of Moral Principles in Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Understanding the Role of Moral Principles in Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Audi, R. N., & Murphy, P. 2006. The many faces of integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 321.
Berenbeim, R. E., & Kaplan, J. A. 2007. The governance of principle- and rule-based ethics programs: An emerging global trend? Executive Report A-0231-07-EA, The Conference Board. Available at http://www.conference-board.org/publications/.
Blum, L. A. 1994. Moral perception and particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bovens, M. 1998. The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowie, N. E. 1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
Calkins, M. 2001. Casuistry and the business case method. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11: 23759.
Dancy, J. 1993. Moral reasons. Malden, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.
Dancy, J.. 2004. Ethics without principles. New York: Oxford University Press.
DesJardins, J. 1993. Virtues and business ethics. In Chryssides, G. & Kaler, J. (Eds.), An introduction to business ethics: 13642. London: Thomson.
Dworkin, R. 1978. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Goodpaster, K. E. 2002. Teaching and learning ethics by the case method. In Bowie, N.E. (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to business ethics: 11742. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
Goodpaster, K. E.. 2007. Conscience and corporate culture. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
Günther, K. 1993. The sense of appropriateness: Application discourses in morality and law, trans. Farrell, J.. Albany: SUNY Press.
Guyer, P. 2006. Kant. New York: Routledge.
Habermas, J. 1993. Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics, trans. Cronin, C.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Haney, M. 2008. On the need for theory in business ethics. In Smith, J. (Ed.), Normative theory and business ethics: 17394. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Herman, B. 1993. The practice of moral judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Herman, B.. 2008. Moral literacy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hill, T. E. 2000. Respect, pluralism and justice: Kantian perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hill, T. E.. 2002. Human welfare and moral worth: Kantian perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Holtman, S. W. 2002. Three strategies for theorizing about justice. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40: 7790.
Horvath, C. M. 1995. Excellence versus effectiveness: MacIntyre’s critique of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5: 499532.
Kant, I. 1929. Critique of pure reason, trans. Smith, N. K.. New York: St. Martin’s Press (original second edition published in 1787).
Kant, I.. 1964. Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals, trans. Paton, H. J.. New York: Harper & Row Publishers (originally published in 1785).
Kant, I.. 1991. Metaphysics of morals, trans. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (originally published in 1798).
Koehn, D. 1995. A role for virtue ethics in the analysis of business practice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5: 53339.
Koehn, D. 2005. Integrity as a business asset. Journal of Business Ethics, 58: 12536.
Korsgaard, C. M. 1996. The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, C. M.. 2009. Self constitution: Agency, identity and integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Little, M. O. 2000. Moral generalities revisited. In Hooker, B. and Little, M. O. (Eds.), Moral particularism: 276304. New York: Oxford University Press.
Little, M. O.. 2001a. On knowing the “why”: Particularism and moral theory. The Hastings Center Report, 31: 3240.
Little, M. O.. 2001b. Wittgensteinian lessons on particularism. In Elliot, C. (Ed.), Slow cures and bad philosophers: Essays on Wittgenstein, medicine, and bioethics: 16180. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.
Maclagen, P. 1998. Management and morality. London: SAGE Publications.
McDowell, J. 1979. Virtue and reason. The Monist, 62: 33150.
McDowell, J.. 1995. Two sorts of naturalism. In Altham, J. and Harrison, R. (Eds.), Virtues and reasons: Phillipa Foot and moral theory: 14979. New York: Oxford University Press.
McKeever, S., & Ridge, M. 2006. Principled ethics: Generalism as a regulative ideal. New York: Oxford University Press.
McNaughton, D. 1991. Moral vision. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
McNaughton, D. & Rawling, P. 2000. Unprincipled ethics. In Hooker, B. and Little, M. O. (Eds.), Moral particularism: 25675. New York: Oxford University Press.
Michael, M. L. 2006. Business ethics: The law of rules. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 475504.
Moore, G. 2008a. Re-imagining the morality of management: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18: 483511.
Moore, G.. 2008b. Virtue ethics and business organizations. In Smith, J. (Ed.), Normative theory and business ethics: 3560. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Why practice needs ethical theory. In Hooker, B. and Little, M. O. (Eds.), Moral particularism: 22755. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Neill, O. 1986. The power of example. Philosophy, 61(235): 529.
O’Neill, O.. 1996. Towards justice and virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Neill, O.. 2001. Practical principles and practical judgment. Hastings Center Report 31: 1523.
O’Neill, O.. 2002. Instituting principles: between duty and action. In Timmons, M. (Ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive essays: 33148. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paine, L. S. 2002. Value shift: Why companies must merge social and financial imperatives to achieve superior performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Painter-Morland, M. 2008. Business ethics as practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palazzo, G. 2007. Organizational integrity: Understanding the dimensions of ethical and unethical behavior in corporations. In Zimmerli, W. C.Richter, K. and Holzinger, M. (Eds), Corporate ethics and corporate governance: 11328. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J.. 2000. Lectures on the history of moral philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Reynolds, S. J., & Bowie, N. E. 2004. A Kantian perspective on the characteristics of ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14: 27592.
Richardson, H. S. 1990. Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19: 279310.
Rosenthal, S. B., & Buchholz, R. A. 1999. Rethinking business ethics: A pragmatic approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schneewind, J. B. 1970. Moral knowledge and moral principles. In Vesey, G. N. A. (Ed.), Knowledge and Necessity: 24962. London: Macmillan Publishers.
Smith, J. 2002. Do particular moral judgments follow a rule? Southern Journal of Philosophy, 40(2): 26994.
Solomon, R. 1992. Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. New York: Oxford University Press.
Soule, E. 2002. Managerial moral strategies: In search of a few good principles. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 11424.
Soule, E., Hedahl, M., & Dienhart, J. 2009. Principles of managerial moral responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 52952.
Stansbury, J. 2009. Reasoned moral agreement: Applying discourse ethics within organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 3356.
Sullivan, R. J. 1989. Immanuel Kant’s moral theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. 1981. The tyranny of principles. The Hastings Center Report, 11: 3139.
Ulrich, P. 2008. Integrative economic ethics: Foundations of a civilized market economy, trans. Fearnes, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. 1999. Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990s: An empirical study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(3): 28394.
Werhane, P. H. 1999. Imagination and management decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wiggins, D. 1987. Needs, values, truth. New York: Blackwell.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Business Ethics Quarterly
  • ISSN: 1052-150X
  • EISSN: 2153-3326
  • URL: /core/journals/business-ethics-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed