Agle, B.R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R.E., Jensen, M.C., Mitchell, R.K., & Wood, D.J. 2008. Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 153–90.http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214 Asher, C.C., Mahoney, J.M., & Mahoney, J.T. 2005. Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9: 5–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10997-005-1570-2
Baron, J. 2007. Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clarkson, M.B.E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92–117.
Coff, R.W. 1999. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10(2): 119–33.http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.2.119
Davis, G., & Cobb, J. 2009. Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In C. Schoonhoven and F. Dobbin (Eds). Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 21–42. Bingley: Emerald.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T.W. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 252–84.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.
Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management. Boston: Pitman/Ballinger.
Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.
Habermas, J. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hendry, J. 2001. Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1): 159–76.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857875 Hilbert, M. 2012. Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: How noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2): 211–37.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025940
Jones, T., & Wicks, A. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 206–21.
Jones, T.M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 404–37.
Khurana, R., & Nohria, N. 2008. It’s time to make management a true profession. Harvard Business Review, 86(10): 70–77.
King, A., & Lenox, M. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556362
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24: 64–81.
Locke, R., & Romis, M. 2007. Improving work conditions in a global supply chain. Sloan Management Review, 48(2): 54–62.
MacGillivray, A., Begley, P. , & Zadek, S. 2007. The state of responsible competitiveness 2007, London: AccountAbility.
Magness, V. 2008. Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 177–92.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9610-2 Mattingly, J. 2004. Stakeholder salience, structural development, and firm performance: Structural and performance correlates of sociopolitical stakeholder management strategies. Business and Society, 43(1): 97–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650304263415
McCoy, M.A., & Salerno, J.A. 2010. Assessing the effects of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill on human health, Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.K. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–86.
Parmar, B., Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A.C., Purnell, L., & Colle, S., 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1): 403–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581
Pfeffer, J & Salancik, G.R. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
Phillips, R.A. 2003. Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Rasche, A. 2012. Global policies and local practice: Loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4): 679–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201222444 Scherer, A.G., & Palazzo, G. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1096–1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26585837
Scott, W.R. 2008. Institutions and organizations, (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sobczak, A. 2006. Are codes of conduct in global supply chains really voluntary? From soft law regulation of labour relations to consumer law. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16: 167–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200616219
Starik, M., & Rands, G. 1995. Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 908–35.
Suchman, M. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.
Swanson, D. 1999. Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 506–21.
Van Buren III, H.J. 2001. If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3: 481–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857850 Vilanova, L. 2007. Neither shareholder nor stakeholder management: What happens when firms are run for their short-term salient stakeholder? European Management Journal, 25(2: 146–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.01.002
Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economics institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.