Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T04:04:22.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Other Shoe: Fragmentation in the Post-Medieval Home

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2016

Ceri Houlbrook*
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, University of Hertfordshire, De Havilland Campus, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9ABUK Email: c.houlbrook@herts.ac.uk

Abstract

Deposits are not always recovered whole; many are found broken and damaged. The obvious explanation is that such objects were accidentally broken; however, some have been interpreted as having been deliberately damaged by their depositors, a practice termed ‘fragmentation’. Objects are broken into parts and deposited incomplete, often in ways that make their missing parts starkly evident. Thus many fragmented deposits denote synecdoche. It is the position of this paper that the absent (part) is just as integral to an understanding of the whole as the present (part) is, and this notion is explored by focusing on the post-medieval concealed shoe: an item of footwear that was fragmented by being deposited within the fabric of a building without its counterpart, for reasons unbeknownst to us. Drawing on a sample of 100 examples, this paper questions why such shoes were deposited as singles (the present parts), what became of the ‘other shoe’ (the absent part), and how such consideration aids our understanding of this enigmatic custom.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)