Genetic Enhancement in Sports: The Role of Reason and Private Rationalities in the Public Arena
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2011
Reviews of philosophical books run the risk of being either excessively and unconstructively critical or superficially praiseworthy. To avoid both these risks, we test the approach outlined by Häyry in his book Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better? by applying it to an eighth genetic challenge, namely, a variation of the genetic enhancement challenge discussed by Häyry as it applies to sports. We assess whether genetic enhancement in sports should be conceived as an eighth wonder or an eighth cardinal sin that stems from the interaction between genetics and society, question whether Häyry’s nonconfrontational approach is really useful for dealing with these issues, and discuss how his method can be improved.
- Special Section: Methodology in Philosophical Bioethics
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
3. Harris, J.The challenge of nonconfrontational ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, this issue, 204–215.Google Scholar
9. For such a discussion, see also Savulescu J. Doping true to the spirit of sport. The Sydney Morning Herald 2007 Aug 8, available at http://www.doping.au.dk/fileadmin/INHDR/Savulescu__Doping_true_to_the_spirit_of_sport.pdf (last accessed 20 Aug 2010); Tamburrini C. Are doping sanctions justified? A moral relativistic view. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics 2006;9(2):199–211; available at http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/17430430500491264 (last accessed 22 Aug 2010).
10. For such an argument, see, for example, Miah, A. Why not dope? It’s still about the health. In: Genetically Modified Athletes: Biomedical Ethics, Gene Doping and Sport. London: Routledge; 2004:12–31.Google Scholar
11. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). World Anti-Doping Code 2009, available at http://www.wada-ama.org/en/World-Anti-Doping-Program/Sports-and-Anti-Doping-Organizations/The-Code/ (last accessed 20 Aug 2010).
12. For a discussion on the weakness of the treatment/enhancement distinction, see Harris, J.Enhancing Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
16. Kass, L, ed. Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. Washington, DC: The President’s Council on Bioethics; 2003.Google Scholar
17. For a review of possible gene enhancement methods, see Wells, DJ. Gene doping: The hype and the reality. British Journal of Pharmacology 2008;154:623–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Wells, DJ. Gene doping: Possibilities and practicalities. Medicine and Sport Science 2009;54:166–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. For a discussion of the criteria of reason acceptability, see note 29, Gutmann, Thompson 2004:Chap. V.