Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-n4bck Total loading time: 0.401 Render date: 2022-08-14T10:20:19.865Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Whoopie Pies, Supersized Fries

“Just” Snacking? “Just” Des(s)erts?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

Extract

The annual cost of healthcare in the United States reached $2.5 trillion in 2009 (about 17.6% of GDP) with projections to 2019 of about $4.5 trillion (about 20% of likely GDP).

Type
Special Section: Open Forum
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Maine and Lancaster, Pennsylvania, both want to claim to be the originator of the whoopie pie. The Maine legislature is seeking to make it the state dessert, hardly an affirmative vote for a greater degree of personal responsibility for health. Zezima, K.Laying claim to a treat, and hearing, “not so fast.” New York Times 2011 Mar 12Google Scholar; available at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/us/03whoopie.html (last accessed 3 Mar 2011).

2. Truffer, CJ, Keehan, S, Smith, S, Cylus, J, Sisko, A, Poisal, JA, et al. . Health spending projections through 2019: The recession’s impact continues. Health Affairs 2010;29:522–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

3. Jemal, A, Bray, F, Center, MM, Ferlay, J, Ward, E, Forman, D. Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011;61Google ScholarPubMed; published online ahead of print and available at http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/full/caac.20108v1?papetoc (last accessed 6 Feb 2011).

4. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes statistics: Data from the 2011 National Diabetes Fact Sheet; available at http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics (last accessed 7 Feb 2011). Twenty-six million Americans have diabetes, and another 79 million Americans are prediabetic.

5. The egalitarians who are strong advocates of personal responsibility for health are luck egalitarians. Their essential claim is that responsibility must be an integral part of a morally defensible conception of healthcare justice. See Dworkin, R.Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2000Google Scholar, especially chapters 2 and 13.

6. Segall, S.Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2010.Google Scholar

7. Arneson, R.Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism. Ethics 2000;110:339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Stemplowska, S.Making justice sensitive to responsibility. Political Studies 2009;57:237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. See, for example Meulen, R.Increasing individual responsibility in Dutch health care: Is solidarity losing ground? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2008;33:262–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Schmidt, H.Personal responsibility for health developments under the German healthcare reform. European Journal of Health Law 2007;14:241–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. Bringedal, B, Feiring, E.On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: A cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics 2011;37:357–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12. Fojo, T, Grady, C.How much is life worth? Cetuximab, non-small cell lung cancer, and the $440 billion question. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009;101:1044–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

13. A recent story in the New York Times is perfectly illustrative of this point. See Alford, H.My unhealthy diet? It got me this far. New York Times 2011 Feb 28Google Scholar; available at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/02/dining/02Elder.html?hpw=&;pagewanted=print (accessed 3 Mar 2011).

14. McCarthy, M.Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;363:2339–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 2347.

15. Ibid., at 2346. McCarthy cites in support of this conclusion Speliotes, EK, Willer, CJ, Berndt, SI, Monda, KL, Thorleifsson, G, Jackson, AU, et al. . Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index. Nature Genetics 2010;42:949–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

16. Ibid. McCarthy writes, “As yet, there are insufficient genetic data to support management decisions for common forms of type 2 diabetes and obesity” (at 2348). The reader is referred to Pearson, ER.Pharmacogenetics in diabetes. Current Diabetes Reports 2009;9:172–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

17. See note 14, McCarthy 2010.

18. Kanaka-Gantenbein, C.Fetal origins of adult diabetes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010;1205:99–105, at 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

19. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care 2008;32:596–615.

20. Boyle, JP, Thompson, TJ, Gregg, EW, Barker, LE, Williamson, DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: Dynamic modelling of incidence, mortality, and pre-diabetes prevalence. Population Health Metrics 2010;8:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; available at http://www.populationhealthmetrics.com/content/8/1/29 (last accessed 3 Mar 2011).

21. Heidenreich, PA, Trogdon, JG, Khavjou, OA, Butler, J, Dracup, K, Ezekowitz, MD, et al. . Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:933–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

22. Kelley, M.Limits on patient responsibility. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2005;30:189–206, at 199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

23. I argue in the following text that the physician in this case is being expected to implement a policy that is prima facie unjustly discriminatory.

24. See Harris, J.Could we hold people responsible for their own adverse health? Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 1995;12:147–53, at 150.Google ScholarPubMed

25. Apparently individuals who do multiple marathons and ultramarathons over the course of many years are likely to do serious damage to their hearts. To avoid premature death, such individuals would need a left ventricular assist device at $200,000 or an artificial heart at $300,000. See Reynolds, G.When exercise is too much of a good thing. New York Times 2011 Mar 9Google Scholar, Well column.

26. This is what Rawls refers to as “rational autonomy,” that is, citizens think of themselves “as having the moral power to form, to revise, and rationally to pursue a conception of the good” (at 72). Rawls, J.Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.Google Scholar

27. I and two colleagues have argued against casually accusing some parents of children with various genetic disorders of being irresponsible. Andre, J, Fleck, LM, Tomlinson, T.On being genetically “irresponsible.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2000;10(2):129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. See Fleck, LM. Do future possible children have a just claim to a sufficiently healthy genome? In: Rhodes, R, Battin, M, Silvers, A, eds. Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:446–57.Google Scholar

29. On using coercive social policies to bring about greater responsibility for personal health in citizens see Wikler, D.Persuasion and coercion for health: Ethical issues in government efforts to change life-styles. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1978;56:303–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Likewise, Elizabeth Anderson is concerned that such government efforts would effectively obliterate the line between the public and the private to the detriment of individuals. See Anderson, E.What is the point of equality? Ethics 1999;109:287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar But I reject the views of libertarians who endorse some form of consumer-directed healthcare as an approach to healthcare cost containment and personal responsibility. For a critical assessment of those views, see Axtell-Thompson, LM.Consumer directed health care: Ethical limits to choice and responsibility. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2005;30:207–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

30. For a detailed defense of rational democratic deliberation in making fair and just rationing decisions, see Fleck, LM.Just Caring: Health Care Rationing and Democratic Deliberation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar See especially chapter 5.

31. See note 6, Segall 2010. See especially chapters 4 and 5.

32. Cappelen, AW, Norheim, OF.Responsibility, fairness and rationing in health care. Health Policy 2006;76:312–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

33. Schmidt makes a related point. “It is not implausible to assume that a sizable proportion of those who are eligible for bonuses would have behaved in the way that ‘earned’ them the bonus anyway, simply because they follow a healthy way of living.” Schmidt, H.Bonuses as incentives and rewards for health responsibility: A good thing? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2008;33:198–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34. Schmidt, H, Voight, K, Wikler, D.Carrots, sticks, and health care reform—problems with wellness incentives. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362:e3(1)–e3(3).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

35. Stock, S, Schmidt, H, Buscher, G, et al. . Financial incentives in the German Statutory Health Insurance: New questions, new findings. Health Policy 2010;96:51–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

36. Others are also critical of using co-payments as a mechanism to incentivize healthier behavior. Cappelen, AW, Norheim, OF, Tungodden, B.Genomics and equal opportunity ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34:361–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

37. Feiring, E.Lifestyle, responsibility, and justice. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34:33–6, at 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

5
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Whoopie Pies, Supersized Fries
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Whoopie Pies, Supersized Fries
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Whoopie Pies, Supersized Fries
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *