Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    McGee, Ellen M. 2016. Forensic Science.

    Werber, Borut and Žnidaršič, Anja 2015. The use of subcutaneous RFID microchip in health care - a willingness to challenge. Health and Technology, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 57.

    Attiah, Mark A. and Farah, Martha J. 2014. Minds, motherboards, and money: futurism and realism in the neuroethics of BCI technologies. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, Vol. 8,

    Lipschutz, Ronnie D. and Hester, Rebecca J. 2014. Uberveillance and the Social Implications of Microchip Implants.

    McGee, Ellen M. 2014. Implantable Bioelectronics.

    McGee, Ellen M. 2014. Uberveillance and the Social Implications of Microchip Implants.

    Johansson, Veronica Garwicz, Martin Kanje, Martin Röcklinsberg, Helena Schouenborg, Jens Tingström, Anders and Görman, Ulf 2013. Beyond Blind Optimism and Unfounded Fears: Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression. Neuroethics, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 457.

    Pisapia, Jared M. Halpern, Casey H. Muller, Ulf J. Vinai, Piergiuseppe Wolf, John A. Whiting, Donald M. Wadden, Thomas A. Baltuch, Gordon H. and Caplan, Arthur L. 2013. Ethical Considerations in Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Addiction and Overeating Associated With Obesity. AJOB Neuroscience, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 35.

    Stephan, K. D. Michael, K. Michael, M. G. Jacob, L. and Anesta, E. P. 2012. Social Implications of Technology: The Past, the Present, and the Future. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 100, Issue. Special Centennial Issue, p. 1752.

    Gasson, Mark N. 2010. 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society. p. 61.

    McGee, Ellen M. 2010. Toward Regulating Human Enhancement Technologies. AJOB Neuroscience, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 49.

    Clausen, Jens 2008. Moving minds: Ethical aspects of neural motor prostheses. Biotechnology Journal, Vol. 3, Issue. 12, p. 1493.

  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Volume 16, Issue 3
  • July 2007, pp. 291-302

Becoming Borg to Become Immortal: Regulating Brain Implant Technologies

  • ELLEN M. McGEE (a1) and GERALD Q. MAGUIRE (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2007

Revolutions in semiconductor device miniaturization, bioelectronics, and applied neural control technologies are enabling scientists to create machine-assisted minds, science fiction's “cyborgs.” In a paper published in 1999, we sought to draw attention to the advances in prosthetic devices, to the myriad of artificial implants, and to the early developments of this technology in cochlear and retinal implants. Our concern, then and now, was to draw attention to the ethical issues arising from these innovations. Since that time, breakthroughs have occurred at a breathtaking pace. Scientists, researchers, and engineers using differing methodologies are pursuing the possibilities of direct interfaces between brains and machines. Technological innovations as such are neither good nor evil; it is the uses devised for them that create moral implications. As there can be ethical problems inherent in the proper human uses of technologies and because brain chips are a very likely future technology, it is prudent to formulate policies and regulations that will mitigate their ill effects before the technologies are widespread. Unlike genetic technologies, which have received widespread scrutiny within the scientific community, national governments, and international forums, brain–machine interfaces have received little social or ethical scrutiny. However, the potential of this technology to change and significantly affect humans is potentially far greater than that of genetic enhancements, because genetic enhancements are inherently limited by biology and the single location of an individual, whereas hybrids of human and machine are not so restricted. Today, intense interest is focused on the development of drugs to enhance memory; yet, these drugs merely promise an improvement of normal memory, not the encyclopedic recall of a computer-enhanced mind combined with the ability to share information at a distance. The potential of brain chips for transforming humanity are astounding. This paper describes advances in hybrid brain–machine interfaces, offers some likely hypotheses concerning future developments, reflects on the implications of combining cloning and transplanted brain chips, and suggests some potential methods of regulating these technologies.We are grateful to Prof. Michah D. Hester for helpful comments on this article.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *