Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article

The Caduceus in court: Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in The Netherlands

  • Robert L. Schwartz (a1)
Extract

As ethics committees become involved in discussing the propriety of euthanasia and assisted suicide, and as healthcare providers begin to seriously consider whether they might ever have a role in hastening the dying process, many have looked to The Netherlands as the only real example of a nation that permits (or, at least, excuses) euthanasia in limited circumstances. Unfortunately, partisans in the Dutch debate have often written about the Dutch experience as advocates rather than as neutral observers. Some have argued that euthanasia, which, they claim, is rarely actually practiced, is universally accepted within The Netherlands; others have reported that the Dutch social fabric has been rended irreparably by what they claim, is a practice far more widespread than is generally understood. The debate in the United States has also been colored by a misunderstanding of the legal regulation of euthanasia in The Netherlands.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
Hide All

1. Dillmann, RJM, Legemaate, J. Euthanasia in The Netherlands: the state of the legal debate. European journal of Health Law 1994;1:81–7.

2. Leenen, HJJ. Dying with dignity; developments in the field of euthanasia in The Netherlands. Medicine and Law 1989;8:517–26.

3. Leenen, HJJ, Ciesielski-Carlucci, C. Force majeure (legal necessity): justification for active termination of life in the case of severely handicapped newborns after forgoing treatment. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1993;2:271–4 (especially note 1).

4. Pijnenborg, L, Van der Maas, PJ, Van Delden, JJM et al. , Life-terminating acts without explicit request of patient. The Lancet 1993;341:1196–9.

5. Van der Wal, G. Unrequested termination of life: is it permissible? Bioethics 1993;7:330–9.

6. See note 2. Leenen, . 1989;9:517–26.

7. Leenen, HJJ. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. In: Byrne, P, ed. Medicine, Medical Ethics and the Value of Life. Chicester/New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990:1–14.

8. See note 7. Leenen, . 1990.

9. See note 3. Leenen, , Ciesielski-Carlucci, . 1993;2:271–4.

10. Royal Dutch Medical Association. Vision on Euthanasia. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Medical Association, 1984.

11. Van der Wal, G, Dillmann, RJM. Euthanasia in The Netherlands. British Medical Journal 1994; 308:1346–9.

12. Van der Maas, PJ, Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L et al. , Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. The Lancet 1991;338:669–74.

13. Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L, Van der Maas, PJ. The Remmelink study: two years later. Hastings Center Report 1993;23:24–7.

14. See note 1. Dillmann, . 1994;1:81–7.

15. See note 12. Van der Maas, PJ et al. , 1991:669–74.

16. Ciesielski-Carlucci, C, Kimsma, G. The impact of reporting cases of euthanasia in Holland: a patient and family perspective. Bioethics 1994;8:151–8.

17. See note 2. Leenen, . 1989:517–26.

18. Bakker, DJ. Active euthanasia: is mercy killing the killing of mercy? In: Mishin, RI, ed. Euthanasia: The Good of the Patient, the Good of Society. Frederick, Maryland: 1992:83–94.

19. See note 12. Van der Maas, PJ et al. , 1991:669–74.

20. Van Delden, JJM, Pijnenborg, L, Van der Maas, PJ. Dances with data. Bioethics 1993;7:323–9.

21. See note 13. Van Delden, et al. , 1993;23:24–7.

22. See note 20. Van Delden, et al. , 1993;7:323–9.

23. Sheldon, T. Dutch prosecutors get tough on euthanasia. British Medical Journal 1994;308:1119–20.

24. See note 4. Pijnenborg, L et al. , 1993;341:1196–9.

25. See note 5. Van der Wal, G. 1993;7:330–9.

26. See note 3. Leenen, HJJ, Ciesielski-Carlucci, C. 1993;2:271–4.

27. See note 5. Van der Wal, G. 1993;7:330–9.

28. Gevers, JKM. Legislation on euthanasia: recent developments in The Netherlands. Journal of Medical Ethics 1992;18:138–41.

29. See note 11. Van der Wal, , Dillmann, . 1994;308:1346–9.

30. Ward, BJ, Tate, PA. Attitudes among NHS doctors to requests for euthanasia. British Medical Journal 1994;308:1332–4.

31. Kenis, Y. Physicians and active euthanasia: practice and opinions (original in French). Bulletin du Conseil National Ordre des Medians 1994;63:53–61.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 110 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×