Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

How Should Health Data Be Used?: Privacy, Secondary Use, and Big Data Sales

Abstract:
Abstract:

Electronic health records, data sharing, big data, data mining, and secondary use are enabling exciting opportunities for improving health and healthcare while also exacerbating privacy concerns. Two court cases about selling prescription data, the Sorrell case in the U.S. and the Source case in the U.K., raise questions of what constitutes “privacy” and “public interest”; they present an opportunity for ethical analysis of data privacy, commodifying data for sale and ownership, combining public and private data, data for research, and transparency and consent. These interwoven issues involve discussion of big data benefits and harms and touch on common dualities of the individual versus the aggregate or the public interest, research (or, more broadly, innovation) versus privacy, individual versus institutional power, identification versus identity and authentication, and virtual versus real individuals and contextualized information. Transparency, flexibility, and accountability are needed for assessing appropriate, judicious, and ethical data uses and users, as some are more compatible with societal norms and values than others.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

I Walden . Anonymising personal data. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2002;10(2):224–37.

DJ Solove . A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2006;154(3):477560.

MJ Taylor . Health research, data protection, and the public interest in notification. Medical Law Review 2011;19(2):267303.

D Beyleveld , E Histed . Betrayal of confidence in the Court of Appeal. Medical Law International 2000;4:277311.

BA Malin , K El Emam , CM O’Keefe . Biomedical data privacy: Problems, perspectives, and recent advances. JAMIA (Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association) 2013;20(1):26.

H Schers , H van den Hoogen , R Grol , W van den Bosch . Continuity of information in general practice: Patient views on confidentiality. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2003;21(1):21–6.

D McGraw . Building public trust in uses of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act de-identified data. JAMIA (Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association) 2013;20(1):2934.

GD Curfman , S Morrissey , JM Drazen . Prescriptions, privacy, and the First Amendment. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;364(21):2053–5.

K Benitez , B Malin . Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA Privacy Rule. JAMIA (Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association) 2010;17(2):169–77.

MA Hall , KA Schulman . Ownership of medical information. JAMA 2009;301(12):1282–4.

NA Christakis , JH Fowler . Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks. PLoS ONE 2010;5(9):e12948.

GJ Annas . Rules for research on human genetic variation—lessons from Iceland. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;342(24):1830–3.

JR Gulcher , K Stefánsson . The Icelandic Healthcare Database and informed consent. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;342(24):1827–9.

KW Goodman , E Berner , MA Dente , B Kaplan , R Koppel , D Rucker , et al. Challenges in ethics, safety, best practices, and oversight regarding HIT vendors, their customers, and patients: A report of an AMIA special task force. JAMIA (Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association) 2011;18(1):7781.

RA Miller , KF Schaffner , A Meisel . Ethical and legal issues related to the use of computer programs in clinical medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine 1985;102:529–36.

KW Goodman . Health information technology: Challenges in ethics, science and uncertainty. In: K Himma , H Tavani , eds. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2008:293309.

B Kaplan , S Litewka . Ethical challenges of telemedicine and telehealth. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2008;17(4):401–16.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • ISSN: 0963-1801
  • EISSN: 1469-2147
  • URL: /core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 33
Total number of PDF views: 254 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 906 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.