We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2018
The issue of assisted suicide for those with a “fulfilled life” is being hotly debated in the Netherlands. A large number of Dutch people feel that elderly people (i.e., people who have reached the age of 70) with a “fulfilled life” should have access to assisted suicide. Citizens have therefore requested Parliament to expand the existing legislation that governs euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. The Dutch constitution does not permit national legislation to be incompatible with higher international (human rights) law. An analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights shows that a person’s right to decide on the time and manner of his or her death should be regarded as an aspect of the right to privacy. Although no positive obligation has been imposed on parties to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to facilitate suicide, they may do so, provided that certain conditions are met.
1. Drion, H. Het zelfgewilde levenseinde van oude mensen (‘The self-chosen death of elderly people’). NRC Handelsblad, October 19, 1991; available at http://retro.nrc.nl/W2/Tegenspraak/Drion/artikeldrion.html (last accessed 15 Jan 2018).Google Scholar
2. HR 24 December 2002, NJ 2003, 167 (ECLI:NL:HR:2002:AE8772).
3. KNMG. Op zoek naar normen voor het handelen van artsen bij vragen om hulp bij levensbeëindiging in geval van lijden aan het leven [In search of rules for physicians faced with requests for assisted suicide by those who suffer from life]. Utrecht; Royal Dutch Medical Association, 2004.
4. See the website of the Dutch Parliament. n.d. https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerleden/commissies/verz/burgerinitiatieven/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
5. See Uit Vrije Wil [Of One’s Own Free Will]. Burgerinitiatief voltooid leven [Citizens’ Initiative Fulfilled Life]. 2017; available at http://www.uitvrijewil.nu/index.php?id=1000/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
6. Kamerstukken II, Handelingen 2011–2, no. 61, item 10. [“Kamerstukken” is best translated as “Parliamentary Proceedings”; “Handelingen” best as “Acts”)
7. Kamerstukken II, 2011–2, 33 026, no. 5.
8. Kamerstukken II, 2012–3, 31 036, no. 7.
9. Kamerstukken II, 2013–4, 32 647, no. 26.
10. Adviescommissie voltooid leven [Advisory Committee Fulfilled Life]. Voltooid leven. Over hulp bij zelfdoding aan mensen die hun leven voltooid achten [Fulfilled Life. On assisted suicide for those who consider their lives fulfilled]. Den Haag: Adviescommissie voltooid leven. 2016.
11. See note 5, Uit Vrije Wil 2017.
12. See note 5, Uit Vrije Wil 2017.
13. See note 5, Uit Vrije Wil 2017.
14. Uit Vrije Wil. Burgerinitiatief voltooid leven, Sections 3, 4 and 13. 2017; available at http://www.uitvrijewil.nu/index.php?id=1006/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
15. Uit Vrije Wil. Burgerinitiatief voltooid leven, Preamble. 2017; available at http://www.uitvrijewil.nu/index.php?id=1006/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
16. Uit Vrije Wil. Burgerinitiatief voltooid leven, Section 2. 2017; available at http://www.uitvrijewil.nu/index.php?id=1006/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
17. Uit Vrije Wil. Burgerinitiatief voltooid leven, Section 11. 2017; available at http://www.uitvrijewil.nu/index.php?id=1006/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
18. Uit Vrije Wil. Burgerinitiatief voltooid leven, Section 7, para. 2. 2017; available at http://www.uitvrijewil.nu/index.php?id=1006/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
19. Euthanasia Act, Section 2, para 1.
20. See note 9, Kamerstukken II, 2013–4.
21. See note 9, Kamerstukken II, 2013–4.
22. See note 10, Adviescommissie voltooid leven 2016, at 34.
23. See Buijsen M. Rapport professor Buijsen [Report professor Buijsen]. Onderzoeksvragen Adviescommissie voltooid leven inzake de interpretatie van het EVRM [Research questions Advisory committee on the interpretation of the ECHR]. 2016; available at https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/levenseinde-eneuthanasie/documenten/rapporten/2016/02/04/rapport-professor-buijsen-onderzoeksvragenadviescommissie-voltooid-leven-inzake-de-interpretatie-van-het-evrm/ (last accessed 22 Aug 2016).
24. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, November 4, 1950 (ETS No. 005).
25. ECtHR April 24, 1978, appl. no 5856/72, Series A, 26 (Tyrer v. United Kingdom), § 31.
26. ECtHR April 29, 2002, appl. no. 2346/02 (Pretty v. United Kingdom).
27. See note 26, ECtHR 2002, at § 39.
28. See note 26, ECtHR 2002, at § 67.
29. ECtHR January 20, 2011, appl. no. 31322/07 (Haas v. Switzerland).
30. See note 29, ECtHR 2011, at § 53.
31. See note 29, ECtHR 2011, at § 51.
32. See note 29, ECtHR 2011, at § 60.
33. See note 26, ECtHR 2002, at § 76.
34. See note 29, ECtHR 2011, at § 58.
35. ECtHR May 14, 2013, appl. no. 67810/10 (Gross v. Switzerland).
36. See note 35, ECtHR 2013, at § 6–21.
37. See note 35, ECtHR 2013, at § 69.
38. ECtHR September 30, 2014, appl. no. 67810/10 (Gross v. Switzerland).
39. See note 29, ECtHR 2011, at § 55.
40. See note 10, Adviescommissie voltooid leven 2016, at 36.
41. See note 10, Adviescommissie voltooid leven 2016, at 231.
42. Kamerstukken II, 2016–7, 32 647, no. 55.
43. See Regeerakkoord 2017 [Coalition agreement 2017]. Vertrouwen in de toekomst [Confidence in the future]. p. 20.2017; available at: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/publicaties/2017/10/10/regeerakkoord-2017vertrouwen-in-de-toekomst (last accessed 15 Jan 2018).
